What's new

The Reason Why Pakistan Fears India's Nuclear Stockpile Despite Owning More Missile Warheads

Let me be generous enough to call what u r a stupid so it take 21 pak nukes to destroy one Indian city and 10 nukes to destroy whole Pak which is 1/3 the size of India

BTW a


@waz just explained the the power of pak nukes read that and reduce your ignorance :)[/QUOTE
FYI another USA scientist has modeled that detonating nukes in cities which unlike desert tests filled with inflammable stuff would unleash massive fires spreading 1000s of km

Those nukes tested by Pakistan n 1998 were all Uranium based . None of them were plutonium based weapons .

If what u saying is true , then they must be new and untested weapons .
And pak officially send u the documents ;)
Post that official doc not your Twitter expert guess work the reference was @waz is giving of guy who is expert of applied physics from globally recognized institution :)
 
. .
Wiki is now official site of pak
It more of guesses

Plutonium program of pak was started along with uran

Wiki is now official site of pak
It more of guesses

Plutonium program of pak was started along with uran
Uranium and every one knows u can produce note plutonium from natural uranium then extracting u235

Wiki is now official site of pak
It more of guesses

Plutonium program of pak was started along with uran


Uranium and every one knows u can produce note plutonium from natural uranium then extracting u235
 
.
The Reason Why Pakistan Fears India's Nuclear Stockpile Despite Owning More Missile Warheads
Wednesday, June 20, 2018
By: MensXP

Source Link: CLICK HERE

  • 5_img120618093802.jpg
  • 5_img120618093802.jpg
  • 5_img120618093802.jpg


India has a healthy stockpile of nuclear weapons and despite Pakistan's rapid pace of developing new nuclear warheads, India is fairly confident of its war capabilities. Currently, India owns 130-140 nuclear warheads as compared to Pakistan's 140-150, according to the latest assessment of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

"India and Pakistan are both expanding their nuclear weapon stockpiles as well as developing new land, sea and air-based missile delivery systems. China continues to modernize its nuclear weapon delivery systems and is slowly increasing the size of its nuclear arsenal," said the latest SIPRI report.

While the twin threat of China and Pakistan cannot be taken lightly, India has built a credible nuclear deterrent which is capable of inflicting heavy damage in a war-like situation.

"The number of warheads does not really matter. With a declared no-first use (NFU) nuclear policy, India is keen to ensure survivability and credibility of our assets and NC3 (nuclear command, control, and communication) systems for assured second-strike capabilities…We have achieved this to a large extent," a source told TOI.

"For India, nuclear weapons are not war-fighting weapons, but credible minimum deterrence, with the certainty of massive retaliation against adversaries," the source further explained.

Pakistan has a handful of cities and for that India does not really need more than 10 to 15 Nuclear Weapons. Islamabad, Lahore and Karachi are Pakistan's only economic hubs. If you take them out there will be no Pakistan left. India on the other hand has more than 4,000 cities and towns with a distributed population. This is the main reason why Pakistan even with a fewer nukes on the Indian side fears a retaliation with guaranteed extermination.

India recently started the process of inducting the country's first intercontinental ballistic missile (Agni-V) with a range of over 5,000 km almost reaching every nook and corner of China.

While there has been a concerted effort from both India and China to grow economically and settle the differences through talks, India's nuclear capabilities do have a key role to play when it comes to foiling China's expansionist plans.
http://www.defencenews.in/article/T...e-Despite-Owning-More-Missile-Warheads-558952


Anshul Gand-hi is the hindu writer.

The mindset with which he is toying about nuclear weapons usage is some thing Stalin and Hitler would shake fearful of.
 
.
Wiki is now official site of pak
It more of guesses

Plutonium program of pak was started along with uran


Uranium and every one knows u can produce note plutonium from natural uranium then extracting u235
BTW if u wanna use wiki it also has Indian page attributing statement of your ex scientists of that time that your hbomb fizzled u just tested first stage not whole hbomb u claimed it gave around 50 KT but in actuality it gave even less then half not enough to induce fusion in secondary ;)
Boosted fission design is more reliable and according to wiki can be scaled to several hundred KT weapon as that Western expert assessed

BTW if u wanna use wiki it also has Indian page attributing statement of your ex scientists of that time that your hbomb fizzled u just tested first stage not whole hbomb u claimed it gave around 50 KT but in actuality it gave even less then half not enough to induce fusion in secondary ;)
Boosted fission design is more reliable and according to wiki can be scaled to several hundred KT weapon as that Western expert assessed
And there was also a chaghi 2
 
.
Wiki is now official site of pak
It more of guesses

Plutonium program of pak was started along with uran


Uranium and every one knows u can produce note plutonium from natural uranium then extracting u235

Man, read any other sources including internationals. you will get some idea... what other countries think about PAK nuclear bomb.
Every reports show..Pakistan tested only uranium based bombs..


India's 1998 test was of a hydrogen bomb, which is many times more powerful than a weapon that Pakistan could produce with its technology.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wo...n-developing-advanced-nuclear-technology.html

https://fas.org/nuke/guide/pakistan/nuke/

Many links are available.... need to just gogle it
 
.
Man, read any other sources including internationals. you will get some idea... what other countries think about PAK nuclear bomb.
Every reports show..Pakistan tested only uranium based bombs..


India's 1998 test was of a hydrogen bomb, which is many times more powerful than a weapon that Pakistan could produce with its technology.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wo...n-developing-advanced-nuclear-technology.html

https://fas.org/nuke/guide/pakistan/nuke/

Many links are available.... need to just gogle it
Your own nuclear scientist has said on record your hbomb fizzled aka failed :)
 
.
All right we are full with fear ,,,,,,,, see I said it ,,,, now if this can give Indians good night sleep , LMAO
And for jumping Indians and Jews on this thread.
There are 10 major cities in India by all means , If we agree with Indians that our bombs are low level even then if we drop 3 bombs on each city (total 30) and we surely have that capability that will be enough for those cities and India as India, , Those 3 small bombs will do enough damage and they will left those 10 cities full with radiation for 10+ years in short 10 major cities of Inida will be grave yards .
Now on Jews , go and pickup poor Arabs , we have nothing to do with you .
 
.
Man, read any other sources including internationals. you will get some idea... what other countries think about PAK nuclear bomb.
Every reports show..Pakistan tested only uranium based bombs..


India's 1998 test was of a hydrogen bomb, which is many times more powerful than a weapon that Pakistan could produce with its technology.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wo...n-developing-advanced-nuclear-technology.html

https://fas.org/nuke/guide/pakistan/nuke/

Many links are available.... need to just gogle it
Btw read before u post to reduce your ignorance the fas site says USA Los Alamos found plutonium traces in samples smuggled form test site soil :)
 
. .
Btw read before u post to reduce your ignorance the fas site says USA Los Alamos found plutonium traces in samples smuggled form test site soil :)
U.S. Labs at Odds on Whether Pakistani Blast Used Plutonium," by Dana Priest Washington Post Sunday, January 17, 1999; Page A02. This article discusses the controversy over the preliminary analysis carried out by Los Alamos National Laboratory, which found that plutonium traces had been released into the atomosphere during Pakistan's May 30th underground nuclear test. Scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Labs contested the accuracy of this finding and alleged that Los Alamos had contaminated and then lost the air sample. At the time, Los Alamos' findings were highly controversial because they implied that Pakistan had obtained plutonium either though imports or indigenous production, and there was uncertainty about Pakistan's plutonium production capabilities. It is now public knowledge that Pakistan can produce and isolate plutonium at its Khusbab reactor and at the New Labs and Chasma
 
.
Man, read any other sources including internationals. you will get some idea... what other countries think about PAK nuclear bomb.
Every reports show..Pakistan tested only uranium based bombs..


India's 1998 test was of a hydrogen bomb, which is many times more powerful than a weapon that Pakistan could produce with its technology.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wo...n-developing-advanced-nuclear-technology.html

https://fas.org/nuke/guide/pakistan/nuke/

Many links are available.... need to just gogle it

There is one facility working since 1990s producing weapons grade plutonium
that facility had one unit, now it has more units in operations
and yet more are under construction.

Do you think that plutonium will be for mother india's dildo ?

Look at the missiles very closely. Especially the MIRV and cruise.
Do they look like Uranium warhead carriers ?

Use common sense.
 
.
Ohh man, you are quoting a scientist.... There are many scientist who are telling It was successful...

Don't you want to listen them?
Which one all of em have said they only tested primary one test the biggest issue of Teller allum design is to properly transfer heat and pressure from primary to secondary to induce fusion
before bomb assembly disintegrates India could not show or prove that capability and one of scientist one of those who did test at great personal risk acknowledged that even the primary failed :d
 
.
Attention grabbing thread headline. Both countries fear a nuclear holocaust; at least I hope the leadership does. As if killing a few million more or less is going to make it less tragic.
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom