What's new

The photos Saudi Arabia doesn't want seen –

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cheetah786

PDF VETERAN
Joined
Aug 23, 2006
Messages
9,002
Reaction score
-3
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
proof Islam's most holy relics are being demolished in Mecca



The authorities in Saudi Arabia have begun dismantling some of the oldest sections of Islam’s most important mosque as part of a highly controversial multi-billion pound expansion.

Photographs obtained by The Independent reveal how workers with drills and mechanical diggers have started demolishing some Ottoman and Abbasid sections on the eastern side of the Masjid al-Haram in Mecca.

The building, which is also known as the Grand Mosque, is the holiest site in Islam because it contains the Kaaba – the point to which all Muslims face when praying. The columns are the last remaining sections of the mosque which date back more than a few hundred years and form the inner perimeter on the outskirts of the white marble floor surrounding the Kaaba.

The new photos, taken over the last few weeks, have caused alarm among archaeologists and come as Prince Charles – a long-term supporter of preserving architectural heritage – flew into Saudi Arabia yesterday for a visit with the Duchess of Cornwall. The timing of his tour has been criticised by human rights campaigners after the Saudis shot seven men in public earlier this week despite major concerns about their trial and the fact that some of the men were juveniles at the time of their alleged crimes.

Many of the Ottoman and Abbasid columns in Mecca were inscribed with intricate Arabic calligraphy marking the names of the Prophet Muhammad’s companions and key moments in his life. One column which is believed to have been ripped down is supposed to mark the spot where Muslims believe Muhammad began his heavenly journey on a winged horse, which took him to Jerusalem and heaven in a single night.

To accommodate the ever increasing number of pilgrims heading to the twin holy cities of Mecca and Medina each year the Saudi authorities have embarked upon a massive expansion project. Billions of pounds have been poured in to increase the capacity of the Masjid al-Haram and the Masjid an-Nabawi in Medina which marks where Muhammad is buried. King Abdullah has put the prominent Wahabi cleric and imam of the Grand Mosque, Abdul Rahman al-Sudais, in charge of the expansion while the Saudi Binladin Group – one of the country’s largest firms – has won the construction contract.

While there is little disagreement over the need to expand, critics have accused the Saudi regime of wantonly disregarding the archaeological, historical and cultural heritage of Islam’s two holiest cities. In the last decade Mecca has been transformed from a dusty desert pilgrimage town into a gleaming metropolis of skyscrapers that tower over the Masjid al-Haram and are filled with a myriad of shopping malls, luxury apartments and five star hotels.

But such a transformation has come at a cost. The Washington-based Gulf Institute estimates that 95 per cent of Mecca's millennium-old buildings have been demolished in the past two decades alone. Dozens of key historical sites dating back to the birth of Islam have already been lost and there is a scramble among archaeologists and academics to try and encourage the authorities to preserve what little remains.

Many senior Wahabis are vehemently against the preservation of historical Islamic sites that are linked to the prophet because they believe it encourages shirq – the sin of idol worshipping.

But Dr Irfan al-Alawi, executive director of the Islamic Heritage Research Foundation which obtained the new photographs from inside the Grand Mosque, says the removal of the Ottoman and Abbasid columns will leave future generations of Muslims ignorant of their significance.

“It matters because many of these columns signified certain areas of the mosque where the Prophet sat and prayed,” he said. “The historical record is being deleted. A new Muslim would never have a clue because there’s nothing marking these locations now. There are ways you could expand Mecca and Medina while protecting the historical heritage of the mosque itself and the surrounding sites.”

There are signs that King Abdullah has listened to concerns about the historical destruction of Mecca and Medina. Last October The Independent revealed how new plans for the masjid an-Nabawi in Medina would result in the destruction of three of the world’s oldest mosques on the west hand side of the main complex. However new plans approved by King Abdullah last week appear to show a change of heart with the bulk of the expansion now slated to take place to the north of the Masjid an-Nabawi.

However key sites are still at risk. The Independent has obtained a presentation used by the Saudis to illustrate how the expansion of Mecca’s main mosque will look. In one of the slides it is clear that the Bayt al-Mawlid, an area which is believed to be the house where Muhammad was born in, will have to be removed unless plans change.

The Independent asked the Saudi Embassy in London a number of questions about the expansion plans and why more was not being done to preserve key historical sites. They replied: “Thank you for calling, but no comment.”

 
It's interesting that all these pieces following the creiticism of the Wahabi fanaticism with praise for Abdullah -- read any piece about some critique about Saudi Arabia and it will include somethig to the effect that Abdullah understand and has acted or is acting to ,,,,
 
Stupid Logic-
Atleast they are not corroupting the place by raising shines-

The new mosque design is very beautiful- and it will help accommodate more people- thus reducing the conjestion created in Umrah and Haj season-

Remember this- The Kabaa is important not some structures built by different people-

And they are not doing the reconstruction in dark- its open for every one to see-

Photographs obtained by The Independent reveal how workers with drills and mechanical diggers have started demolishing some Ottoman and Abbasid sections on the eastern side of the Masjid al-Haram in Mecca.

Some one ask the stupid author how a expansion or reconstruction is done in this modern technological world following the established international standards and procedures-
Certainly not by a hammer and a nail- Ridiculous People-
 
Obviously OP never visited Makkah during Hajj, or he will know how much it get crowded there, the new expansion of Haram will make it much easier for pilgrimage to do their Hajj.

HolyMasjidKingAbdullahExpansion.jpg


Makkah_1.gif


i didn't know the newspaper The INdependant was shia. good to know :hitwall:

I guess they don't have Muslim and Shia journalist working in that newspaper then.
 
I don't think there is any importance for Historic places in Islam.

As is evident from Saudi's demolition of Prophet Mohammed(PUBH) historic sites in his life time.
 
Obviously OP never visited Makkah during Hajj, or he will know how much it get crowded there, the new expansion of Haram will make it much easier for pilgrimage to do their Hajj.

HolyMasjidKingAbdullahExpansion.jpg


Makkah_1.gif




I guess they don't have Muslim and Shia journalist working in that newspaper then.
What do you make believe he is a shia writing the article ?
the writer is Jerome Taylor and he is clearly not shia if you check a bit about him and his articles

you have an obsession towards shias and that's painful. get some tolerance point towards "other" religion. myself i didn't make difference between branches of Islam.

i never heard any Iranians around my family or friends saying KSA wants to destroy holy place by the way. anyway.

Obviously such people have more hollier places in Iraq and Iran that they prefer to visit- :whistle:-
if you get some knowledge before speaking it is better: a lot of Iranians go to KSA every year. I would say i am sure there are even more than Pakistanis compared to the population. thanks.

I don't think there is any importance for Historic places in Islam.

As is evident from Saudi's demolition of Prophet Mohammed(PUBH) historic sites in his life time.

the article is archeological purpose.
 
Obviously such people have more hollier places in Iraq and Iran that they prefer to visit- :whistle:-

First and Most important house of Saud is part owner of the newspaper second what does the destruction thats part of Wahhabi ideology has any thing to do with shias.

Shias arent the ones doing the destruction under the disguise of ''Expansion'' Wahhabi s are,shias arent the ones printing it in newspaper westerners are.

So instead of blaming shias concentrates on the Topic and as far as your comments about shia holy sites is concerned we had lots of Wahhabi help in destroying those too.

Stupid Logic-
At least they are not corrupting the place by raising shines-

Off course not they are destroying the historic places to build mega malls and hotels i guess that will be called progress.
 
Mod Edit

so who else going to get upset when we destroy them ?
i see .. you are full of hatred . you have no sense of respect for us.
by the way if you were a little open minded you'd get why we act like this. if you didn't have any respect for the family of the prophet this is your business, this is your choice and i respect it. but at least respect our beliefs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom