The Perils Of The Manmohan Singh-Bush Alliance

[BanglaBhoot]

Still 7 Indians are no intellectual match for me. Resorting to nonsensical one liners only highlights your impotence.

The issue here is the article by Prakash Karat. He raises many pertinent points. Discuss those.

 

[Goodperson]

Still 7 Indians are no intellectual match for me. Resorting to nonsensical one liners only highlights your impotence.

The issue here is the article by Prakash Karat. He raises many pertinent points. Discuss those.

Prakash is a commie other Indians may or may not like him.

But do you remember AbdurRahim Azad ?

 

[Humanoid]

Still 7 Indians are no intellectual match for me. Resorting to nonsensical one liners only highlights your impotence.

The issue here is the article by Prakash Karat. He raises many pertinent points. Discuss those.

Sir ..you are absolutely a gem.. keep us entertained.. an author of distinguished background and participants of so many web forums .. would engage in counting beans .. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7...is exactly not the kind of responses anyone would expect from a barrister who is 40+ mebbe...but if that gives you pleasure you are most welcomed ..

did I make it 8 Indians?

 

[BanglaBhoot]

Sir ..you are absolutely a gem.. keep us entertained.. an author of distinguished background and participants of so many web forums .. would engage in counting beans .. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7...is exactly not the kind of responses anyone would expect from a barrister who is 40+ mebbe...but if that gives you pleasure you are most welcomed ..

did I make it 8 Indians?

So the Indians on this forum are beans. Well put. Thanks for the input.

Actually I am 36.

But I think we digress again from the subject of the thread.

 

[Neo]

Guys cut the cheap sarcasm, it degrades the level of debate we're enjoing sofar.
The Barrister has made a few good points, counter it intellectualy if you want or leave the debate.

Thanks,
Neo

 

[BanglaBhoot]

In light of Neo's intervention I think we can now get back to the issues.

 

[Goodperson]

Guys cut the cheap sarcasm, it degrades the level of debate we're enjoing sofar.
The Barrister has made a few good points, counter it intellectualy if you want or ignore it.

Thanks,
Neo

There is no need to counter Munshi, He started here posting Article from Prakash Karat that is the only good point he thinks, But after that he has sticked to India bashing and made very amusing comments.

So he gets response in his own language.

 

[Spring Onion]

had this same nuclear deal been offered by china, the commies would go on their knees and beg to have it signed.

Indeed they would have gone for such a deal beacuse the problem is not the deal but US.

And as compare to US, having deal with China would have been a better choice. Despite disputes, China is far less dangerouse even for India as compare to US.


Guys kindly come back to the topic.Discuss it as when we resort to personal attacks it means we have no point to support our view. Thanks.

 

[su-47]

Indeed they would have gone for such a deal beacuse the problem is not the deal but US.

And as compare to US, having deal with China would have been a better choice. Despite disputes, China is far less dangerouse even for India as compare to US.


Guys kindly come back to the topic.Discuss it as when we resort to personal attacks it means we have no point to support our view. Thanks.

but Jana, the question is will they offer it? probably not.

 

[Goodperson]

but Jana, the question is will they offer it? probably not.

But the point is would they have supported India in NSG ? Now with all approvals India would always go for better technology from competing nations Its open to China too