ThunderCat
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2009
- Messages
- 3,532
- Reaction score
- -2
Exactly:And food supply always rises to meet population demand.....end of story.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly:And food supply always rises to meet population demand.....end of story.
Yet, we are still centuries away before we really hit any genuine limit on agricultural output even with today's mainstream agricultural practices.Yeah they still will- to make way for more people. The Earth is not infinite. Also increasing food increases the carrying capacity; therefor creating more mouths.
Industry is only sustainable in small numbers. This is really a suicidal idea for humanity and the rest of the planet.Yet, we are still centuries away before we really hit any genuine limit on agricultural output even with today's mainstream agricultural practices.
Half of the food in the world is wasted, with most of it in the West. As I said before, even without having everybody subsisting on a diet of seaweed, the earth can house close to one trillion people in a relative comfort.
And by the time we will hit that, we will have many times more productive agriculture, and industry, and be probably already making city sized space stations, thus obviating the scarcity of land as such.
Exactly:
No but he did explain it. David Pimentel is an insect ecologist and made contributions to other ecology.Again, you're posting old videos with senile old men in them...
You need to update your research.
Btw, Daniel Quinn is a author......a writer....what does he know about overpopulation??
Is he a scientist, an engineer, a manager at a farm?? Nope...
Yet, we are still centuries away before we really hit any genuine limit on agricultural output even with today's mainstream agricultural practices.
Half of the food in the world is wasted, with most of it in the West. As I said before, even without having everybody subsisting on a diet of seaweed, the earth can house close to one trillion people in a relative comfort.
And by the time we will hit that, we will have many times more productive agriculture, and industry, and be probably already making city sized space stations, thus obviating the scarcity of land as such.
A big country needs a lot of people. More people = more power. Pakistan need to increase its population to match Indian troop numbers in case of mobilisation.Just because you can grow food on a piece of land it doesn't mean you do. We are already in the midst of the sixth extinction. The consequences of that extinction and CO2 buildup is unknown at this time. The prudent thing to do is to limit the global population growth. China has done its part of limiting its population growth.
I doubt the earth can support 15 billion people. Look at all the wars that break out in countries with high fertility rates.
The reduction in fertility is not an automatic reduction in the population growth. There are countries with skyrocketing populations, and relatively low fertility. There are even countries where the two were inversely proportional.