The one state solution to all Arab-Jewish problems.

[eliyaas]

Yes yu are right.Jew thought that this is their private property.But they are wrong it is our land....a land of muslims

 

[BudZilla]

So do the arabs plan to convert to Jews too or just want to be ruled by Jews since they cant rule themselves?

 

[somebozo]

it is nt ballistine bt palestine:

Palestine in a Roman word, there is no P in Arabic so it is Falasteen

Yes yu are right.Jew thought that this is their private property.But they are wrong it is our land....a land of muslims

Much of the land ownership in Palestine during the Ottoman era were absentee land-lordship. The actual land owners lived at far off places and it is even dubious how they acquired the land. Many of them earned by participation in wars or acts of loyalty towards the ruling governor / elite but many others use nepotism and corruption. Peasants were shipped from Syria, Jordan and Egypt to inhabitiate and cultivate this land for the benefit of their landlords. As such these peasants were nothing but slaves of their landlords - much like how it is in Pakistan. Had they been natives of the lands, their physche would not be so dominated by neighboring Arab rulers into abandoning their ancestral homes and possession on the march of advancing Arab army. Rather they would have felt connection to the land of their ancestors and would have held amicable ground against the advancing opposition. Because both the belligerent groups - Jews and Arabs were non-native to the land at large, a fight for limited resources ensued and eventually the victor got to keep the chunk of it. This dark chapter in Arab-Palestinian history is one of the major reason why Arab countries collectively resist naturalizing Palestinians. They want to carve a nation out of a myth. Almost no Palestinean can trace ancestory to the land of Palestine beyond their grand father and will easily reveal which part of the Arab world they came from to settle into Palestine.

These absentee landlords - largely beneficiaries of Ottoman empire and left in no certainity with the rise of Arab revolt against Ottomans - were the largest benefactors of Jewish immigration selling land at lucrative prices without the knowledge of the peasants they have encourage to settle on these lands. Over nights these peasants found the land slipping under their feet. Not wanting to be ashamed, the Arab leader creating the myth of land grab and Palestinian nationhood.

Essentially there was systematic corruption too - many peasants sold their landlord properties illegally through falsified deeds and with ottoman empire left in shambles after WW1 there wasn't much law and order enforcement or checks and balances into ex-ottoman land titles either.

Jewish land purchase in Palestine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[T-123456]

In pure logic he has got a point to stand on!

And what point might that be?
He is talking about Arabs and Jews,where are the turks and iranians?

 

[United]

So do the arabs plan to convert to Jews too or just want to be ruled by Jews since they cant rule themselves?

arabs aka muslims ruled india 600yrs why coz hindus could not rule themselves?......what stupid comparison.

 

[Black Widow]

arabs aka muslims ruled India 600yrs why coz Hindus could not rule themselves?......what stupid comparison.

Who told you this?? 'Nishan-e-Babur' 'Zaid Zaman Hamid'??

ill-informed kid.....

 

[United]

Who told you this?? 'Nishan-e-Babur' 'Zaid Zaman Hamid'??

ill-informed kid.....

Uncle ji google this "muslims rule over india" guess i was wrong some doc claim 1000 yrs.....

btwn i came across this quote

"Dear Brother Bisvas,

I can't believe in your statements because Muslims ruled 1,000 (Turks, Mughals, Afghans, Iranians etc.) and still Muslims are in minority in India? Some Europeans ruled in American, Asian and African continents for 150-250 years and they converted 100% people to Roman Catholic? So, either RC is the best religion or they used force? If they used force again …it's wrong (as per some people in India that Muslim converted by force) because why people did not converted 100% in India? "

tou widow ji app ka wichar kya hai?

PS: please dont give stupid reply.

 

[Tunisian Marine Corps]

Uncle ji google this "muslims rule over india" guess i was wrong some doc claim 1000 yrs.....

btwn i came across this quote

"Dear Brother Bisvas,

I can't believe in your statements because Muslims ruled 1,000 (Turks, Mughals, Afghans, Iranians etc.) and still Muslims are in minority in India? Some Europeans ruled in American, Asian and African continents for 150-250 years and they converted 100% people to Roman Catholic? So, either RC is the best religion or they used force? If they used force again …it's wrong (as per some people in India that Muslim converted by force) because why people did not converted 100% in India? "

tou widow ji app ka wichar kya hai?

PS: please dont give stupid reply.

1st Africans didn't have a solid culture they don't fight the Europeans culture , and they see the Europeans better then them


why they didn't convert Arab Muslims just they forced less then 1 % ( in Tunisia and other nations )

why Muslims don't convert all India because we don't force them like what the RC do in africa and asia

 

[Rig Vedic]

Umm ... what kind of joke is this? How would a 1-state middle east still be Jewish?