Global Rejection of Donald Trump’s Gaza Relocation Proposal

Global Rejection of Donald Trump’s Gaza Relocation Proposal

Donald Trump's recent proposal regarding the relocation of Palestinians and a U.S. "takeover" of Gaza has sparked widespread condemnation from leaders and nations across the globe. Many view the proposal as a blatant violation of international law and a threat to regional stability.

Key Responses from Around the World

Palestinian Leadership
- President Mahmoud Abbas: Denounced the plan as a "serious violation of international law" and called for the United Nations to step in to protect Palestinian rights.

- Hamas: Criticized the proposal as a "recipe for chaos and tension," warning of further destabilization in the region.

Arab Nations
- Egypt: Rejected any suggestion to relocate Palestinians to its territory, advocating for rebuilding efforts in Gaza without displacing its residents.

- Jordan: King Abdullah firmly opposed land annexation and displacement, emphasizing the need for regional integrity.

- Saudi Arabia: Reiterated its commitment to an independent Palestinian state, calling the proposal a violation of its long-standing position on Palestinian sovereignty.

- United Arab Emirates and Qatar: Joined other Arab nations in rejecting relocation plans, aligning with regional opposition to forced displacement.

- Syrian leader Ahmed Al-Sharaa : Pressure should be put on Israel and a return to the 1967 borders should be ensured.

International Organizations
- Arab League: Declared Trump’s proposal a scenario of displacement that breaches international law, calling for global opposition to such plans.

- Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC): Condemned the statements as consolidating occupation and settlement practices, violating international law principles.

Western Nations
- Germany: Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock reaffirmed that a two-state solution is the only path to peace, condemning forced population transfers.

- France: Stated that Gaza must remain part of a future Palestinian state and that forced relocation violates international law.

- Britain, Ireland, and Spain: All voiced opposition to the proposal and reiterated support for a two-state solution.

Other Global Powers
- China: Supported a two-state solution as the foundation for peace in the region.

- Russia: Backed a two-state solution, rejecting any moves undermining Palestinian sovereignty.

- Australia: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed Australia’s support for a two-state solution, emphasizing Palestinian rights.

- Netherlands: Foreign Affairs Minister Caspar Veldkamp stated that "Gaza belongs to the Palestinians," rejecting the displacement plan.

Conclusion
The overwhelming international response demonstrates a unified stance against Trump’s Gaza proposal. Leaders and nations from every corner of the world have reaffirmed their commitment to a two-state solution as the only viable path to lasting peace and stability in the region. The rejection underscores the global consensus that forced displacement and occupation policies are unacceptable under international law.

 

[MegynKelly]

Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu Supports Trump’s Gaza Plan

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has voiced strong support for former U.S. President Donald Trump's controversial proposal for the Gaza Strip. Speaking on the matter, Netanyahu stated:
"This is the first good idea that I have heard; it's a remarkable idea, and I think it should be really pursued, examined, and done!"

Context of Trump's Proposal
Trump’s plan reportedly includes:
- Relocation of Palestinians: Suggesting the movement of Palestinian populations out of Gaza.
-U.S. "Takeover" of Gaza: Introducing American involvement in administering the region.

The proposal has sparked widespread criticism from both regional and international actors, who view it as a violation of international law and a threat to Palestinian sovereignty.

Netanyahu’s Backing
Netanyahu’s endorsement aligns with his longstanding stance on:
- Strengthening Israel’s security.
- Reducing Hamas’s influence in the Gaza Strip.
- Seeking solutions that challenge the traditional frameworks of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Global Reactions

While Netanyahu has praised the plan, it has been met with rejection by numerous global leaders and organizations, citing concerns over:
- Human rights violations: Forced displacement of Palestinians.
- Regional stability: Potential for increased tensions and conflict.

Opposition Highlights
- The Arab League and Organization of Islamic Cooperation have condemned the plan as unlawful.
- European nations, including Germany and France, reaffirm their support for a two-state solution.
- Palestinian leaders view the plan as a direct attack on their rights and sovereignty.

Conclusion
Netanyahu’s approval of Trump’s Gaza proposal marks a significant endorsement of a highly divisive plan. While it resonates with some Israeli political circles, it faces strong opposition on the global stage. The controversy underscores the ongoing complexity and sensitivity of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with no clear resolution in sight.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1887472522939003346

 

[MegynKelly]

North Korea Condemns U.S. Proposal on Gaza Calls It "Ludicrous"

North Korean state media on Wednesday criticized U.S. President Donald Trump's proposal to take over Gaza and relocate Palestinians calling it "ludicrous" and accusing Washington of extortion. The remarks were published in a commentary by the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) though Trump was not directly named.

According to KCNA, the proposal is diminishing the already slim hopes of Palestinians for safety and peace. The state-run agency claimed that the international community is reacting strongly to the U.S. announcement. "The world is now boiling like a porridge pot over the US bombshell declaration" the report stated.

Trump's plan reportedly includes removing Gaza's residents and transforming the territory into what he described as a "Riviera of the Middle East." The KCNA commentary criticized the proposal, calling it an infringement on Palestinian sovereignty and accusing the U.S. of disregarding international norms.

"The U.S. should wake up from its anachronistic delusion and immediately stop violating the dignity and sovereignty of other countries and peoples," the report added, labeling the U.S. an "extortionist."

North Korea has frequently expressed opposition to U.S. foreign policy and has been vocal about the situation in Gaza. The country has repeatedly blamed Israel for the ongoing conflict and referred to the United States as an "accomplice" to the violence.

Despite past diplomatic engagements between Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, North Korea's state media has largely refrained from commenting on Trump's second term. However, it continues to criticize U.S. policies, citing Washington and its allies as a major security threat

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

What will Arabs do if Trump forces Egypt to take Gazans?

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

This is the actual Saudi, Emirati, Moroccan, Bahraini, Egyptian and Jordanian position.

"We are working for Israeli and American national interest."

 

[gambit]

What will Arabs do if Trump forces Egypt to take Gazans?

Not a damned thing.

No, the US will not 'force' any neighboring countries to take in the Palestinians. But what the US can do is somehow make it attractive for them to do so. What? We do not know for now. But the reality is that if enough Palestinians CHOOSE to leave Gaza for greener pastures, and if those countries accept them, there is nothing the rest of the Arab countries and the world can do. What are they going to do? Send troops to keep the Palestinians from leaving Gaza? Who and how much? Shoot to kill? Build walls?

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

Not a damned thing.

No, the US will not 'force' any neighboring countries to take in the Palestinians. But what the US can do is somehow make it attractive for them to do so. What? We do not know for now. But the reality is that if enough Palestinians CHOOSE to leave Gaza for greener pastures, and if those countries accept them, there is nothing the rest of the Arab countries and the world can do. What are they going to do? Send troops to keep the Palestinians from leaving Gaza? Who and how much? Shoot to kill? Build walls?

Palestinians are native people who will not disappear from the consciousness of the middle east. Old Testament mentions Palestinians in Prophet Abraham's time who migrated to that land from Iraq, then his descendants from Sara moved to Egypt for many centuries. Palestinians are mentioned in Egyptian hieroglyphs as well.

Palestinians abroad are regarded as refugees by international law and they consider themselves refugees with intent to return, even those who are third or fourth generation. Palestinians in Arab countries are classified as refugees by the Arab states.

Jews lived on that land over a thousand years while Palestinians were there continously for millenia going back to the Ice Age. The problem here is Zionist apartheid which disregards Palestinian identity and rights. Inside Israel they call Palestinians, Arabs. That should tell you who does not recognize who.

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

This guy used to be Zionist.

 

[gambit]

Palestinians are native people who will not disappear from the consciousness of the middle east. Old Testament mentions Palestinians in Prophet Abraham's time who migrated to that land from Iraq, then his descendants from Sara moved to Egypt for many centuries. Palestinians are mentioned in Egyptian hieroglyphs as well.

Palestinians abroad are regarded as refugees by international law and they consider themselves refugees with intent to return, even those who are third or fourth generation. Palestinians in Arab countries are classified as refugees by the Arab states.

Jews lived on that land over a thousand years while Palestinians were there continously for millenia going back to the Ice Age. The problem here is Zionist apartheid which disregards Palestinian identity and rights. Inside Israel they call Palestinians, Arabs. That should tell you who does not recognize who.

Nothing you said address the issue on what the Arabs can do if enough Palestinians CHOOSE to exit Gaza. All it takes is merely %10 for the rest of the general population to begin thinking of their own affairs, as in the cost-benefits analysis of staying or leaving. Screaming 'Zionists...Zionists...' will do nothing as, if allowed, people packs up their sh!t and beat their feet.

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

Nothing you said address the issue on what the Arabs can do if enough Palestinians CHOOSE to exit Gaza. All it takes is merely %10 for the rest of the general population to begin thinking of their own affairs, as in the cost-benefits analysis of staying or leaving. Screaming 'Zionists...Zionists...' will do nothing as, if allowed, people packs up their sh!t and beat their feet.

You are unfamiliar with the ideology of Zionism or ignoring it. Half a million Palestinians chose to return to destroyed Northern Gaza because there is no guarantee of returning to their land if they leave. Why would you spend billions on building houses outside of Gaza, like Trump said. Does not make sense. Damn anyone who creates genocidal inhumane conditions to begin with, then pretends righteousness.

 

[gambit]

You are unfamiliar with the ideology of Zionism or ignoring it. Half a million Palestinians chose to return to destroyed Northern Gaza because there is no guarantee of returning to their land if they leave. Why would you spend billions on building houses outside of Gaza, like Trump said. Does not make sense. Damn anyone who creates genocidal inhumane conditions to begin with, then pretends righteousness.

Egypt and Jordan prevents Palestinians from entering their lands. If only %10 of the Palestinians are allowed to leave Gaza, Hamas is done.

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

Egypt and Jordan prevents Palestinians from entering their lands. If only %10 of the Palestinians are allowed to leave Gaza, Hamas is done.

Where did you get that 10% figure from.

Almost half of Jordan is Palestinian refugee. Egypt has about 70,000. There are Palestinians in many Arab countries. Even if they have the passport of their host Arab country, it probably indicates somewhere they are Palestinian. They want it that way because they intend to return and this sentiment is very strong. Many may have only residency and travel document issued by their host Arab country identifying them as Palestinian.

They belong in their ancestral land. Why should Palestinians move away from their ancestral homeland which is in Palestine and in today's Israel? Why should other countries be obliged to host them? They are not Jordanian, Egyptian, Syrian or any other Arab nationality. The problem is Zionism.

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

It is easy to identify different Arabs by their different Arabic accents. Palestinian accent is probably closest to Jordanian.

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

Can we ask Scotts to move to Ireland because, hey, they both speak English.

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

My question is why don't Arabs put up the points I made. I don't want to be making these points. They have cuck leaders though they are blessed with physical strength and natural resources. My interest is that injustice, racism, fascism, apartheid, discrimination, theft, oppression, ethnic cleansing, mass murder, and genocide, the hallmarks of Zionism, should not be normalized.