The New Chinese Missile Looks Very Familiar to Iskander.

[Doctor09]

when china achieve something that other can not then why they say its a copy of this and that...........if someone cant appreciate or have a problem of digesting something then please dont degrade others...............they have skills thats y they do such things if u dont have then try to get that skills so that u have no fear of others success..............if china gets this technology im not saying they get but if then wats bad in it knowledge and skills are something that can be learned from any one......no one can learn even these skills without efforts

 

[Hafizzz]

Wow. Instead of discussing the merits or demerits of the article, the "Bots", as usual, have resorted to attacking the member/OP. Idiots!
Well, nothing new about this behavior, guess its the norm, aint it fellas?

Look who is talking when Indian users often drag Pakistan and China into every thread when the topic is about India.....now Indian users such as yourself is accusing non-Indians for doing the same !!!

 

[rcrmj]

when that indian guy found this article he must be very excited``coz again there is something 'claimed' china 'copy' stuff so they can take their inferior complexity out this to the chinese``haha`!

well the fact is still there which india cant even assemble bought foreign equipments successfully``

so my advice to those indian friends think it for a second when u start to troll on chinese threads, coz u only making fool of urself`

 

[scuthan]

Old Soviet Tech? China don´t need no stinking old tech...

that's a very classy russian way to flatter themselves.

 

[scuthan]

dont steal french tech, Indian.

Dude, you should apologize for blaming Indians' plagiarism. They did not copy it. LCA's airframe was designed and made possible by french Dassault. besides it boasts Lockheed Martin's flight control, GE's enginee, Israel Radar, Israel, Russian, French missiles, a long list goes on.

 

[tanlixiang28776]

Thats enough. I think they get it.

And its also a bit annoying.

 

[Vassnti]

A lot of irrelevant infos. Just by the pictures, the missile and launcher platform have various visible differences.

Yup for a start the Chinese version is a lot smaller

 

[BigTree.CN]

The thread starter.

Lol, that is a good one! Simply brilliant.

 

[tanlixiang28776]

Yup for a start the Chinese version is a lot smaller

Not as small as the Indian version is.

 

[gubbi]

Look who is talking when Indian users often drag Pakistan and China into every thread when the topic is about India.....now Indian users such as yourself is accusing non-Indians for doing the same !!!

Of course, there are some idiots who do that. But generally, Indians are the first to acknowledge that there are problems in India and that the Indian govt is working to solve them. Even many Pakistani members here do that - accept problems prevalent in Pakistan, which is quite appreciated!

However, on the contrary, whenever any article critical of Chinese policies is posted, many "bots" come together, not to discuss the article, but to attack whoever has posted it. Search the threads and you will see a pattern! Evidently, they dont have a concept of discussing merits/demerits. How can you blame them?

 

[tanlixiang28776]

Gubbi.

We don't mind discussing something critical about China as long as the thread is posted by a Chinese member, or respected non Chinese members like Joe Shearer.

Unfortunately SR 71 is not in the two categories.

 

[gubbi]

Gubbi.

We don't mind discussing something critical about China as long as the thread is posted by a Chinese member, or respected non Chinese members like Joe Shearer.

Unfortunately SR 71 is not in the two categories.

Thats judging, right there. Just discuss the article, so what if an Indian posted it. Seriously what difference does it make if its posted by a TT or a newbie? This "bot" behavior spoils the whole thread. Why do that?

If you think the OP has ulterior sinister motives, just dont respond. Saves a lot of trouble, really.

Anyway, the OP didnt make any comment nor post his views, so whats the beef?

 

[tanlixiang28776]

Thats judging, right there. Just discuss the article, so what if an Indian posted it. Seriously what difference does it make if its posted by a TT or a newbie? This "bot" behavior spoils the whole thread. Why do that?

If you think the OP has ulterior sinister motives, just dont respond. Saves a lot of trouble, really.

Anyway, the OP didnt make any comment nor post his views, so whats the beef?

http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...bulence-ahead-fighter-jet-tejas-analysts.html

nuff said

 

[Luftwaffe]

This is not an appropriate thread but for indians a good news is Jane.s Defense is reporting india will have GE F414 engine with 90/100kN thrust in LCA MK II, now i am wondering where is kavri engine going to end up.

 

[IndianArmy]

This is not an appropriate thread but for indians a good news is Jane.s Defense is reporting india will have GE F414 engine with 90/100kN thrust in LCA MK II, now i am wondering where is kavri engine going to end up.

R&D is an Important aspect of Modernizing the Technical Values but Its certainly does not compel the application of the technology as Learning is more important that applying as long as its not a hurdle for the development of the machine where its supposed to be in.. Developing GTRE Kaveri has helped India to develop KMGT..

And also there is a New Engine under development replacing the Current Kabini core