What's new

The Nation: Pakistan bids to make OIC a ‘mini-UN’

Yep Pakistan pushing the whole OIC forward whilst countries within the OIC have already put the knife into Pakistan at the FATF meeting...It's enough to make you cry in despair. What unity is this?
But anyway, I guess Pakistan should do it for itself.
 
Veto power is vital for UN security council. If America wants UNSC do something against Russian benefits, and Russia don't agree. That will bring in a nuclear war.

UNSC is for those superpowers to discuss something before they start a third world war. That is the reality. Assume OIC want to punish Turkey, who is going to execute that order? In the end, you just gave an empty order, and everyone is laughing at OIC.

A court is nothing without policemen. When Russia and America provide the major police force to UNSC, you simply can't get police force punish them.
Or what about rotating the veto powers amongst the members on a two year basis, as opposed to having five permanent Veto powers? Would that not be fairer for the world?
 
We need to invest in OIC and Military aspect of this organization so that any rouge entities can be controlled and also there is a larger framework of Business promotion between countries

Pakistan - Turkey - Iran are key
Saudia (Gulf States) offer a Good additional important Role
Indonesia/Malaysia have a important role in Eastern Asia
Egypt - Algeria - Tunis - Morroco of course being important African states

However , Palestine requires acknowledgement and Embassies need to be setup now
 
Last edited:
Veto makes UN the most undemocratic organization on the planet. Veto is the reason nothing is done for Palestine. Veto is the reason nothing is done for any Muslim country. In is the collective reason for picking on small weak countries by bullies like America

The idea is good but the Arabs won't allow it
Dude, there is no pure democracy.

Guess what will happen US can't veto UNSC decision? They just deploy US troops possibly thermonuclear bombs to Isreal. And who is going to execute that UNSC decision? Russian will not fight for Palestine when it will threaten their benefits. China will not intervene in another country except they have been invaded. France and UK will do what the US told them to do.

The veto is not the key point which hurts Muslim countries, the Global reality does. UNSC once decided to fight the Korean war, and China didn't agree. The corpse of UN troops make PRC have the veto power. The truth is ugly, but you have to admit that.

Or what about rotating the veto powers amongst the members on a two year basis, as opposed to having five permanent Veto powers? Would that not be fairer for the world?
It comes back to the original question. What will happen when UNSC have a decision against the US or Russia?

It have a way to make decisions to help Palestine: the UN general assembly of the united nations. But again who will carry out your order?
 
Dude, there is no pure democracy.

Guess what will happen US can't veto UNSC decision? They just deploy US troops possibly thermonuclear bombs to Isreal. And who is going to execute that UNSC decision? Russian will not fight for Palestine when it will threaten their benefits. China will not intervene in another country except they have been invaded. France and UK will do what the US told them to do.

The veto is not the key point which hurts Muslim countries, the Global reality does. UNSC once decided to fight the Korean war, and China didn't agree. The corpse of UN troops make PRC have the veto power. The truth is ugly, but you have to admit that.


It comes back to the original question. What will happen when UNSC have a decision against the US or Russia?

It have a way to make decisions to help Palestine: the UN general assembly of the united nations. But again who will carry out your order?
They do it anyways. When does the USA listen the UN
 
EXTRAORDINARY SUMMIT CALLED UP by Honorable 'Erdogan'

1180301-265671159.jpg


https://nation.com.pk/07-May-2018/pakistan-bids-to-make-oic-a-mini-un

ISLAMABAD - Pakistan is making efforts to make the Organization of Islamic Cooperation a ‘mini-United Nations’, transforming it into a more effective organization that can help resolve the issues facing Muslim-majority countries, officials said.

Senior officials at the foreign ministry told The Nation that the OIC had the potential to be transformed into a stronger organization as it represented a good percentage of humanity.

One official said: “For decades, the OIC has been condemning excesses against the Muslims or recommending certain actions which are never accepted by the countries concerned. This should end now. The OIC should be like a mini-UN which can exert pressure.”
03-11.jpg

He said: “There are several countries in the OIC like Pakistan that are powerful and have their say in the international affairs. The OIC needs to be respected by the world. Its decisions can be implemented if we (the OIC members) stand together.”

Another official said that Islamabad believed a powerful OIC could help resolve the Kashmir issue. “The time for condemnations is long over. We have to go for Kashmir solution through practical steps. If the OIC members stand united, we can put pressure on India to resolve the Kashmir issue,” he said.

The official said countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran need to play an active role as they had good ties with India. “The OIC represents around 20 percent of the humanity. We are itself a mini-UN,” he said.
41769413_303.jpg

On Sunday, the OIC stressed the need for resolving lingering disputes and conflicts through negotiations and by the use of other peaceful means. The call was made in the declaration issued after a two-day 45th session of the Council of Foreign Ministers of the OIC meeting held in Dhaka, said a foreign ministry statement. The theme of the meeting was: ‘Islamic values for sustainable peace, solidarity and development’.

The member states agreed that the OIC peace and security architecture and the good offices of the secretary-general need to be activated for the purpose.

The declaration said the OIC countries reaffirmed their principled support for the right of the Palestinian people to regain their inalienable rights, including the right to self-determination, and to the independence and sovereignty of the State of Palestine on the pre-1967 borders with Al-Quds Al-Sharif as its capital.

In this context, they rejected the recent US recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and condemned its decision to move its embassy to the city on May 14.

The OIC member states invited all members of the international community to remain committed to the status of Al-Quds al-Sharif and all related UN resolutions.

They also reaffirmed firm solidarity with the people of occupied Kashmir, who have been struggling for their right to self-determination.

The OIC member countries expressed deep concern over the recent systematic brutal acts perpetrated by security forces against the Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar.

They reiterated support for the settlement of the Afghan conflict through an inclusive Afghan-led process of national reconciliation.

Earlier, Pakistan reiterated commitment to continue its efforts for creating an environment that fosters cooperation and development in the region and beyond.

In her statement at the OIC FMs’ meeting, Foreign Secretary Tehmina Janjua said development was closely linked with peace and security and “our efforts towards sustainable development must be synchronized with efforts for lasting peace”.

Janjua said without resolving disputes, the dreams of economic growth, the realization of the full economic potential of our countries, development as well as stability would remain unfulfilled.

She emphasized that OIC fraternity must redouble its efforts to coordinate more closely and reach out to important constituencies in the Western world to halt the negative developments that are aimed at “defaming our religion.”
OH I SEE
 
Dude, there is no pure democracy.

Guess what will happen US can't veto UNSC decision? They just deploy US troops possibly thermonuclear bombs to Isreal. And who is going to execute that UNSC decision? Russian will not fight for Palestine when it will threaten their benefits. China will not intervene in another country except they have been invaded. France and UK will do what the US told them to do.

The veto is not the key point which hurts Muslim countries, the Global reality does. UNSC once decided to fight the Korean war, and China didn't agree. The corpse of UN troops make PRC have the veto power. The truth is ugly, but you have to admit that.


It comes back to the original question. What will happen when UNSC have a decision against the US or Russia?

It have a way to make decisions to help Palestine: the UN general assembly of the united nations. But again who will carry out your order?
I understand ... basically this is aimed at people who think the UN is fair system; just a fraud covered with a fig leaf of "fairness"
 
Not now , not in near future ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, But in real future OIC will be great . It is very important for us to keep it alive and upgrade it.
 
Why the **** do all of you not understand the fact that Pakistan historically cozied up only to those Muslim countries and regimes which had the Western stamp of approval? Matlab ajeeb log ho har ghaddar aur pithoo se dosti kar ke baith jatay ho then you express disappointment over their lack of integrity. Wth?
 
There isn't a single organization of this sort (Arab League, OIC) which aren't either staffed by governments who are traitors to their people or passive puppet regimes to the West.
 
Veto power is vital for UN security council. If America wants UNSC do something against Russian benefits, and Russia don't agree. That will bring in a nuclear war.

UNSC is for those superpowers to discuss something before they start a third world war. That is the reality. Assume OIC want to punish Turkey, who is going to execute that order? In the end, you just gave an empty order, and everyone is laughing at OIC.

A court is nothing without policemen. When Russia and America provide the major police force to UNSC, you simply can't get police force punish them.

Very true, without Veto the whole idea of UNSC perishes. For this reason there shouldn't be anymore new members. Either UNSC remains what it is now or there will be no more UNSC if new entrants are allowed.
 
OIC ... forget it !!! it is nothing more than a vehicle for empty promises and holding meetings in plush five-star hotels.
 
OIC should be abandoned as a useless and time wasting plattform..such antics remind me of Bhutto islamic socialism..which instead gave us theological fascism..
kicking out arabs and iran will make OIc more effective.
 
Back
Top Bottom