The Myth of Pashtuns never been ruled and reality check for Afghans

[Lord ZeN]

Alexander conquered Afghanistan but he was defeated in Pakistan. About until 100 years ago no one had any interest in Afghanistan, armies conquered afghanistan or bribed afghan tribes to come to India, thats where the wealth was. why would anyone spend energies on Afghanistan, to collect stones?

There was no Pakistan at that time.

 

[Samandri]

Alexander conquered Afghanistan but he was defeated in Pakistan. About until 100 years ago no one had any interest in Afghanistan, armies conquered afghanistan or bribed afghan tribes to come to India, thats where the wealth was. why would anyone spend energies on Afghanistan, to collect stones?

Most of the invaders who invaded india for wealth and loot, emerged from these same stones and mountains of Afghanistan whether they were turks, tajiks or Pashtuns or ancient nations like kushans, scythians etc

 

[xyxmt]

There was no Pakistan at that time.

Pakistan was there even before India was, Pakistan is a state of mind

 

[mujhaidind]

It were sikhs, not punjabi muslaman, who were waging guerrilla war against Afghan rulers of punjab. Punjabi musalman were not even in position to challenge either sikhs or afghans, they were powerless and weak spectators. I would place not place sikhs on the same level and category as punjabi-muslims, rulers and ruled can not be on same level.

Racial hatred and superiority complex will stay in this part of the world.

On topic Sikhs did persecute Muslims in Jammu and Kashmir. I am not sure about Punjab tho.

 

[Rana4pak]

Their a house in side of town.when ever any one gain power from town he went to tht house kick the door beat the owner and rape her girl and again rape her n other famaly members .than beat the owner again .when he is tired he decided to rest but house is very ugly n dirty so he decided to move out .when owner see he's mmoving out he stand up n says Why are you running .I will see you .house .girl n owner are Afghanistan's .the powe guys r Russians.America's.NATO.Mongols .Turks Persians .rajputs Sikhs n circle goes on

 

[Lord ZeN]

Pakistan was there even before India was, Pakistan is a state of mind

So Pakistan should not claim any particular landmass as it's own.
Pakistan was created for Muslims of Sub continent . So you should not claim the history of Non-Muslims.

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

The Sikh's conquest of certain parts in Afghanistan, particularly, the Pashtun territories, was backed, armed, and financed by the British empire while Pashtun Afghans had no one to back them. Even in such a disadvantage position, Sunni Pashtuns has viciously fought back and drove the invaders out. Additionally, history proves that Pashtuns have alsways defeated every empire that came along while others clapped their butt-cheeks for those same empires. Indeed Afghanistan is where empire go and die. Truth needs to be told!

Watch Sheikh Imran Hosein in Youtube:

Black Flags Army | Khurasan Afghanistan from Hadiths || Sheikh Imran Hosein

watch?v=REsIbkfOSDs

 

[B+ Dracula]

Watch Sheikh Imran Hosein in Youtube:

Sheikh Hussain speaks bad about my country (as we are part of Nato against Al-qaida)....i wont watch him...even if he explains wonderful

 

[EL LOBO]

it aint a myth... even karzai is afraid that we will capture afghan

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

Sheikh Hussain speaks bad about my country (as we are part of Nato against Al-qaida)....i wont watch him...even if he explains wonderful

NATO? Which country is that?

 

[Umair Nawaz]

Farty, Ranjeet singh didnt establish rule over Afghan-pashtuns of today but on your pakistani pathans of peshawer, kohat, bannu and Di Khan.....make up your mind, you want to bash Afghan-pashtuns or pak-pathanis aka khochas?

That being said, Sikhs couldnt enforce their laws on pakhtukhwa e.g banning azaan, ban on slaughtering cows etc......on the other hand, they ruled over their punjabi musalman kinsmen to their heart content..... i was reading in "history of punjab" by lateef (punjabi muslim author), that food of punjabi muslims became vegetarian due to sikh rule.....

Arnt u also a pakistani pathan yourself?

 

[Kabira]

Every nation goes through rise and fall. In 18th century Pashtuns emerged as powerful players but 19th century was period of their fall and failures, while Sikhs emerged as new power who challenged the predations of Pashtuns into Punjab, then farangis appeared and taught lessons to every one. The thread starter, @Zarrar Alvi (the one copy pasting from wiki) should study history more deeply, It was Sikh empire vs Durrani empire. Sikhs didnt share power and authority with their punjabi muslaman subjects, Afghans did the same when they were masters of punjab. It were sikhs, not punjabi muslaman, who were waging guerrilla war against Afghan rulers of punjab. Punjabi musalman were not even in position to challenge either sikhs or afghans, they were powerless and weak spectators. I would place not place sikhs on the same level and category as punjabi-muslims, rulers and ruled can not be on same level.

Lol Afghanis were not rulers of greater punjab in time frame you are talking about. Unless few afghani chief in south punjab/seraiki is meant for all of greater punjab. It was between muslim chiefs and sikh chiefs. Sikhs united for religious reasons at right time while muslim chiefs were still in to tribal mindset so lost one by one against united enemy. Otherwise sikhs are not superhuman either. Also i remember how you claimed seraiki tribe langah were afghan warriors lololol

This is troll thread anyway lol, i posted new interesting article in history section.