The Mathematics of Military Balance

[SR 71 Blackbird]

And after that, total nuclear annihilation if the US does not stop its racial wars of genocide.

China going to annihilate US.
PRC-250 nukes.
US-5000+nukes.

 

[below_freezing]

China going to annihilate US.
PRC-250 nukes.
US-5000+nukes.

1.) if China gets nuked, Russia will also get nuked because the US will not tolerate Russia being an actual nuclear power.
2.) Yeah this is as accurate as Israel "having no nukes". No one knows how many nukes China has. In 1980 they said we had 100 nukes, you think in 30 years we build 5 nukes per year only when we can build 20+ rockets?

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

China going to annihilate US.
PRC-250 nukes.
US-5000+nukes.

You cannot rely on Western source, and they even claim that China's nuke is 294 times more powerful than India's.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

1.) if China gets nuked, Russia will also get nuked because the US will not tolerate Russia being an actual nuclear power.
2.) Yeah this is as accurate as Israel "having no nukes". No one knows how many nukes China has. In 1980 they said we had 100 nukes, you think in 30 years we build 5 nukes per year only when we can build 20+ rockets?

We had about 500-1000 nukes in the late 1980s.

 

[conworldus]

China going to annihilate US.
PRC-250 nukes.
US-5000+nukes.

To annihilate the U.S, around 100 nukes will do. 5000 nukes will destroy the whole planet many times over, but what's the point?

 

[below_freezing]

To annihilate the U.S, around 100 nukes will do. 5000 nukes will destroy the whole planet many times over, but what's the point?

That is a common misconception by anti-nuclear radicals. 5000 nukes will not do sh*t to the planet. The asteroid that killed the dinosaurs had the power of 10^9 nukes and the world keeps spinning.

Tsar Bomba - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Blast yield 50 megatons of TNT (210 PJ)

210 petajoules = 2.1* 10^17 joules

This is the biggest nuke ever made. Normal nukes are around 0.5 MT, so this is like 10 nukes in 1.

Joule - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Exajoule

The exajoule (EJ) is equal to 10^18 joules. The 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami in Japan had 1.41 EJ of energy according to its 9.0 on the Richter magnitude scale.

5000 nukes isn't worth sh*t

Yottajoule

The yottajoule (YJ) is equal to 1024 joules. This is approximately the amount of energy required to heat the entire volume of water on Earth by 1˚Celsius.

100 nukes will not even scratch the US, because the Wall Street regime would be hidden in underground bunkers. As long as the Wall Street regime and anti-Chinese radicals are not dead, the US will still be a threat even if 99% of the population and 99% of the industry is gone.

 

[HongWu]

100 nukes will not even scratch the US, because the Wall Street regime would be hidden in underground bunkers. As long as the Wall Street regime and anti-Chinese radicals are not dead, the US will still be a threat even if 99% of the population and 99% of the industry is gone.

Exactly! You need biological weapons that target specific kinds of DNA. Jews are too diverse I think for this but Japanese seem pretty homogeneous, but with Japanese you gotta worry about collateral damage since they are East Asians (though they would never admit it!).

Or else old fashioned boots on the ground in enemy territory and drag out rebellious menfolk to the ditches.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

That is a common misconception by anti-nuclear radicals. 5000 nukes will not do sh*t to the planet. The asteroid that killed the dinosaurs had the power of 10^9 nukes and the world keeps spinning.

Tsar Bomba - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Blast yield 50 megatons of TNT (210 PJ)

210 petajoules = 2.1* 10^17 joules

This is the biggest nuke ever made. Normal nukes are around 0.5 MT, so this is like 10 nukes in 1.

Joule - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Exajoule

The exajoule (EJ) is equal to 10^18 joules. The 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami in Japan had 1.41 EJ of energy according to its 9.0 on the Richter magnitude scale.

5000 nukes isn't worth sh*t

Yottajoule

The yottajoule (YJ) is equal to 1024 joules. This is approximately the amount of energy required to heat the entire volume of water on Earth by 1˚Celsius.

100 nukes will not even scratch the US, because the Wall Street regime would be hidden in underground bunkers. As long as the Wall Street regime and anti-Chinese radicals are not dead, the US will still be a threat even if 99% of the population and 99% of the industry is gone.

True, China needs to have 10,000 nukes in order to be comparable with US.

 

[Burnz]

Exactly! You need biological weapons that target specific kinds of DNA. Jews are too diverse I think for this but Japanese seem pretty homogeneous, but with Japanese you gotta worry about collateral damage since they are East Asians (though they would never admit it!).

Or else old fashioned boots on the ground in enemy territory and drag out rebellious menfolk to the ditches.

So will China name it Unit 731?

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

So will China name it Unit 731?

You are disgusting.

 

[casual]

Hmmm...Not surprised that you are wrong...

First, the US defense budget is barely %5 of GDP, so that is hardly 'unsustainable'. Second, an 'arms race' is so only if there is a contestant, which in this case are China and Russia, manufacturers of indigenous weaponry to either consume or sell. Those who purchase their defense cannot be a contestant in said 'arms race' unless they are in contest against neighbors, not against sellers.

So for a defense budget that barely scratches %5 of GDP, that mean the US defense budget is about more about maintenance and low to moderate levels of improvement of current systems, not of an all-out 'race' like when the Soviet Union was alive and was such a contestant. But since China is undergoing overall modernization, no longer maintenance since the Soviet Union no longer exist to supply China with arms, it is China who is triggering an 'arms race'. Still, the US is at least 10yrs ahead of China in every aspect of military affairs at %5 of GDP and the US is implementing new systems that mean the US will remain ahead of China at very sustainable rate.

the US government spending is unsustainable.

 

[Obambam]

Hmmm...Not surprised that you are wrong...

First, the US defense budget is barely %5 of GDP, so that is hardly 'unsustainable'. Second, an 'arms race' is so only if there is a contestant, which in this case are China and Russia, manufacturers of indigenous weaponry to either consume or sell. Those who purchase their defense cannot be a contestant in said 'arms race' unless they are in contest against neighbors, not against sellers.

So for a defense budget that barely scratches %5 of GDP, that mean the US defense budget is about more about maintenance and low to moderate levels of improvement of current systems, not of an all-out 'race' like when the Soviet Union was alive and was such a contestant. But since China is undergoing overall modernization, no longer maintenance since the Soviet Union no longer exist to supply China with arms, it is China who is triggering an 'arms race'. Still, the US is at least 10yrs ahead of China in every aspect of military affairs at %5 of GDP and the US is implementing new systems that mean the US will remain ahead of China at very sustainable rate.

I am surprised that the plate is 'Always' full and everyone gets even share over there. I guess it is another one of those 'Only in America' thing.
I am glad the declining economy, sluggish growth rate, rising unemployment rate, ever so huge debt and inflation has no impact on the country that you are living in.

I know this video is old, but it gives a good indication as to the things your country could have done with all that money spent on defense.

China is growing and it is modrernizing 'FAST' unlike America which is in decline. So to say US will remain ahead of China at very sustainable rate is nothing but a fallacy. Not to mention that cost of production in China is also ahead of the US.

 

[Brotherhood]

So will China name it Unit 731?

No, we will name it 1962 pigs slaughtering party instead. What do you think?

 

[below_freezing]

No, we will name it 1962 pigs slaughtering party instead. What do you think?

Lets not sink to the level of racists. Otherwise what separates us from those subhuman scum that come to China, bash China and Chinese, and spit in our faces even as they take their salary?