What's new

The JF-17 is a truly remarkable plane

The SC

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
32,233
Reaction score
21
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
According to the JF-17's engineers at Chengdu, the JF-17 has the world's second combat aircraft to have DSI intakes. These intakes reduce weight, costs and complexity while improving performance. The intake reduces one of the three major forward scatters of an aircraft that typically represents between 30%-35% of the RCS of an aircraft. While the JF-17 began with a similar wing design concept to the F-16, The JF-17 has incorporated a leading-edge root extension that is similar in concept to the F/A-18. The leading-edge root extension (LERX) covers an area of about 9% of the Wing area. This has led to an improved Center of Gravity (CG) and better harmonization of its multirole capability by taking advantage of the pitch digital fly-by-wire Flight Control Systems (FCS) and the variations possible with the LERX.

The result of this is to improve control of the aircraft and to lower supersonic drag. Given the low margins on this class of combat aircraft, such improvement represent a significant feat.

The JF-17's Man Machine Interface (MMI), with full Hands On Throttle-And-Stick (HOTAS) and glass cockpit represent a truly 4+ generation in combat aircraft. The aircraft has the capability to perform air defense, interdiction, airfield strike, precision strike, and escort missions. While deep penetrations into Indian airspace may not be in the order of the day, given the close proximity of many Indian airfields and military installations, the JF-17 can play a significant role for the PAF, even in strike, a role sometimes overlooked by analysts. With the latest modifications and the newer version of the RD-93 (or WS-13), the JF-17 will be able to perform at a large radius of action.

In terms of meeting PAF's specifications, the JF-17 has the distinction of exceeding the PAF Air Staff requirements, including (surprisingly), for the attack role.

The Russian RD-93, despite "engineered" controversy by the Indian media, is slated to power at least the initial batches of the JF-17. The RD-93 is to be equiped with advanced crystal blade technology and a Digital Electronic Engine Control (DEEC). Other than improving the engine performance, the DEEC results in carefree handling under a wide range of conditions and at virtually all relevant altitudes.

The JF-17 has been designed from day one for ease of operations and maintainability. One such feature is that of a single point pressure refueling system. This significantly reduces the turn around time, meaning more sorties can be generated, while maintenance intensive Indian aircraft remain grounded. This is furthered by the modular maintenance design of the aircraft. The level of the serviceability and ease of general maintenance is further illustrated by how panels and components are installed at man's height and a full computer-controlled fault diagnosis and analysis system can be relied upon.

The JF-17 is a truly remarkable plane. Starting from the basic designs that Chengdu and the PAF were tinkering with, the Super-7 with basically a MiG-21 with side intakes, it has evolved into a completely different beast. The Internet Military Aviation community was taken by complete surprise, almost shock when the JF-17 came out with a modern cockpit, DSI intakes and previously unseen quality of build.

Yet, when even the most ardent followers of the program had thought that the JF-17 had fully evolved, it has once again surprised all of us in its next evolution. It is likely that this evolution is going to take shape after the second batch. Changes are comprehensive and across the board and include greater range, lower RCS, AESA radar and a new engine with greater TWR (thrust to weight ratio).

The lower RCS is to be reached using new materials, including advanced composites. A new RAM paint is also rumored that is said to be similar to that being used on the F-35. The nose will see comprehensive redesign and is rumored to incorporate a new AESA radar set of Chinese origin. One proposition is that the single tail is replaced with twin-tails similar to the F-35. A new DSI is also projected that will further lower RCS.

The TWR of the engine is projected to increase with the WS-13, which are likely to go into the second batch. The iteration of the WS-13, possibly the "WS-13A" is likely to go into the stealthier JF-17. Another painted scenario is of a further iteration of the RD-93. This will marginally increase the TWR further, which itself will increase the TWR marginally.

However, this increase in the TWR of the engine will be moderated by the increase in the wing size, greater internal fuel and the twin tails, amongst other weight increases. On the other hand, newer materials and over all weight decreasing projects in turn will moderate these weight increases.

The stealthier JF-17 will incorporate a larger wing, improving higher altitude maneuverability. This is a crucial aspect that is increasingly becoming important in BVR combat, where the higher and faster jets can in some form take pot shots at slower and lower BVR platforms. Another aspect of the larger wing will be increased internal fuel carrying capacity. This is addresses one of the areas that the JF-17 is weaker in - range and the ability to stay on station longer.

The nose, vital areas of the cockpit as well as a whole host of other technical areas will be addressed. the nose will in fact be fully redesigned around a new AESA radar and be formated to lower RCS. The DSI design is also being redesigned to better accommodate and optimize higher altitudes and higher speeds. A second generation of the onboard information collection, dissemination and display will be incorporated.

However, thrust vectoring will not be incorporated, neither will be internal carriage of weapons. This planned version may or may not go into production. However, all, most or many of the changes may be incorporated into the third batch of 50 being ordered by Pakistan. My personal opinion is that this prototype is more of a technology demonstrator. Major changes would not be appropriate unless a major export customer is found. I would think however that all the minor changes, as well as a few crucial major ones will be incorporated. This is likely to include the new engine, as well as the larger wings. Stealth features should also be incorporated but major redesign is likely to be avoided for the 3rd batch production models (such as twin tails and new nose). This version will be targeted for export and will not be part of the Chinese arsenal.

A Light Sabre for the Third World: The FC-1 / JF-17 Thunder (II)

10112012160.jpg





 
. .
I like the middle pic. Are they planning on making a JF-17 like that too?
 
.
I like the middle pic. Are they planning on making a JF-17 like that too?
Yes but after batch 3, apparently.

if memory serves me rite...This is a very old article.
Old but still relevant it speaks about the future of the JF-17, Batch 2 and beyond, batch 2 is in its early production. So the article is still timely and goes beyond the present time. It is like a guideline for anyone who wants to know about the JF-17 project development.
 
Last edited:
.
Yes but after batch 3, apparently.


Old but still relevant it speaks about the future of the JF-17, Batch 2 and beyond, batch 2 is in its early production. So the article is still timely and goes beyond the present time. It is like a guideline for anyone who wants to know about the JF-17 project development.
---
can you ut 5 things whihc make it REMARKABLE..?
 
. . . . . . .
price.
multi-role - AD/CAS/Maritime-strike.
bvr capable.
easier maintenance/easy supply chain.
easy to fly.
And above all, within a decade, it's in production and operational in squadron service. !!

Why should I be? It's just a JF-17, not a F-22. :)

Now stick to the topic please, yes its a low cost solution for a cash-starved country wanting to replace its old 3rd gen fighters with something more capable, and JF-17 fits the bill. It is not a world-beater, neither you can afford a world-beater. :)
So tell us, is Tejas in line to be a world beater, ever wondered why despite being several decades late, why India is still pursuing this project...... apart from replacing the older fleet in PAF, JF-17 also is ideal to counter any threat from across the border......and despite the ignorance, the Block-52s are the best platforms in the region.
 
Last edited:
. .
And above all, within a decade, it's in production and operational in squadron service. !!


So tell us, is Tejas in line to be a world beater, ever wondered why despite being several decades late, why India is still pursuing this project...... apart from replacing the older fleet in PAF, JF-17 also is ideal to counter any threat from across the border......and despite the ignorance, the Block-52s are the best platforms in the region.


Its not result of a decade.. Its result of work of many decade of deciphering of MiGs... I remember an article whr it mention


--China was trying to make a small size aircraft, They tested every component . But later they found Lavi and Su27 so they scrapped that project. Later when they saw pakistan market they revive the project and in 10 years they produced FC1...

So FC1 is not made in 10 years, Every component was tested , chinese just integrate it and produced it. None of the component was tested on FC1.. All components were tested on predecessor aircraft..

And above all, within a decade, it's in production and operational in squadron service. !!


So tell us, is Tejas in line to be a world beater, ever wondered why despite being several decades late, why India is still pursuing this project...... apart from replacing the older fleet in PAF, JF-17 also is ideal to counter any threat from across the border......and despite the ignorance, the Block-52s are the best platforms in the region.


Its not result of a decade.. Its result of work of many decade of deciphering of MiGs... I remember an article whr it mention


--China was trying to make a small size aircraft, They tested every component . But later they found Lavi and Su27 so they scrapped that project. Later when they saw pakistan market they revive the project and in 10 years they produced FC1...

So FC1 is not made in 10 years, Every component was tested , chinese just integrate it and produced it. None of the component was tested on FC1.. All components were tested on predecessor aircraft..

10 year was just for integration.. You can't say 10 year of development.

No country on earth can develop a new platform in 10 years..

Even if you see history of F16, before integration it was tested by LM for decades..
 
.
So tell us, is Tejas in line to be a world beater, ever wondered why despite being several decades late, why India is still pursuing this project...... apart from replacing the older fleet in PAF, JF-17 also is ideal to counter any threat from across the border......and despite the ignorance, the Block-52s are the best platforms in the region.

Let's stick to the topic here, we are not discussing Tejas or Block-52s here, both are a class-apart from JF-17, but save that discussion for another thread. I have already agreed that JF-17 is better than your old ROSE-III and F-7s, and can be a match for our Bisons, so it certainly increases your capabilities. But here we are only discussing JF-17, don't flame it by dragging in other planes.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom