What's new

The Folly of The German Air Force

We are not a Blue Water Navy
We are not a Air Superiority Airforce
We refuse to make our own Engines for Tanks
We go against Terrorist on Western frontier , on foot instead of 150+ Helicopter fleet
Strategic Bombers , are not needed as it would hurt feelings of other nations
Our Space sattelite can just be sent on someone else's Rocket
Engines , hell we will just order some why bother to make one


hmmm sums it up

Any thing that starts with the terminology "Strategic ------" our planners worry less about buying and more about finding excuses to shelf that idea
 
Last edited:
We are not a Blue Water Navy
Not needed:disagree:
We are not a Air Superiority Airforce
Who said you thato_O:what:
We go against Terrorist on Western frontier , on foot instead of 150+ Helicopter fleet
hellis are also in ued:agree:
Strategic Bombers , are not needed as it would hurt feelings of other nations
Waste of resourse we need a dedicated strike jet like F-111, F-15E, JH-7A-B, Su-34 rather useless strategic bombers:disagree:
Engines , hell we will just order some why bother to make one
we are on the way sir, maybe after 2020:pakistan:
 
Hi,

The only reason this video is being posted in this section is obvious---Paf has no heavy strike aircraft---.

Germany did not have one either

Enjoy the video



sir ,heavies bring "nothing" to the TABLE :lol: :p:

Not needed:disagree:

Who said you thato_O:what:

hellis are also in ued:agree:

Waste of resourse we need a dedicated strike jet like F-111, F-15E, JH-7A-B, Su-34 rather useless strategic bombers:disagree:

we are on the way sir, maybe after 2020:pakistan:

sarcasm :hitwall: :P
 
Hi,

The only reason this video is being posted in this section is obvious---Paf has no heavy strike aircraft---.

Germany did not have one either

Enjoy the video



Sorry to contradict you Sir but Germany did had alot of Bomber Aircraft in service during WW2. The only problem they had was they kept losing bombers with whole Crews mostly. How else were they able to keep bombing Britain during the War.

Capture.JPG
 
Sorry to contradict you Sir but Germany did had alot of Bomber Aircraft in service during WW2. The only problem they had was they kept losing bombers with whole Crews mostly. How else were they able to keep bombing Britain during the War.

View attachment 394692


Hi,

Please reply in reference to the video---which has in detail, discussed the issue:---

Here are a few interesting links---if you read them up---you will find that most were developed too late in the war to make a difference.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dornier_Do_19

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:World_War_II_heavy_bombers_of_Germany

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dornier_Do_217

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinkel_He_177
 
Pakistan Forces need a Mandate that is Universally accepted by all Military Forces world wide which is a solid balance in all Areas
 
Need Truck Bomber , to take Truck load of goods
Escorted by 2 Thunders


We are stuck in the WW1 trench warefare mentality as can be seen at our Afghan border
 
Last edited:
During WW2 Luftwaffe was operated tactically to gain conventional air-superiority in the skies through face to face dogfights.
Which meant strategic bombing wasn't the first priority as in case of allied powers at the time against Germany.
This is also influenced due to the gains made by blitzkreig and the initial thrusts (Before BoB)

Same holds true fo PAF ,It is operated to hold back and provide cover to groud force against a 3x larger enemy.
The only reason is economics and the budget is being stretched from Government spending to defense needs ,Perhaps if the sleeping nation wakes up to ask the Government where is the 30 % black economy going? and why the Government is zip about it.
 
Back
Top Bottom