The Fight against PKK Terrorism
- Thread starter Neptune
- Start date
Hamzza
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2016
- Messages
- 540
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Islamic faith&Secularism
BANNED
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2013
- Messages
- 4,224
- Reaction score
- -9
- Country
- Location
the so called ''flag'' of PKK terrorism host is waving in the international airport of Atatürk for the first time.
A reminder: the main ''camps'' of PKK terrorists are in northern Iraq, which is safe heaven for PKK terrorists in their lethal attacks to Turkey for decades.
xenon54 out
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2013
- Messages
- 17,568
- Reaction score
- 20
- Country
- Location
Which airport is this?
AnatolianEagle
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2016
- Messages
- 374
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
ANKARA Esenboga
xenon54 out
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2013
- Messages
- 17,568
- Reaction score
- 20
- Country
- Location
Well seems like it was a state visit from Barzani, if we are working together with him then its normal to hoist his countries flag.
AnatolianEagle
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2016
- Messages
- 374
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Working together? His country? lol
xenon54 out
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2013
- Messages
- 17,568
- Reaction score
- 20
- Country
- Location
It is at it is, we are working with Barzani and KRG is de facto independent, what use does it have to hide from reality?
AnatolianEagle
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2016
- Messages
- 374
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Is that why you use Ataturk on youre profile.
funny you agree with Erdogans politics this time how?
xenon54 out
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2013
- Messages
- 17,568
- Reaction score
- 20
- Country
- Location
Wait am i just becoming a traitor for telling the truth?Is that why you use Ataturk on youre profile.
Besides, no i dont agree though i gotta say better work with Barzani which is hated by pkk than let him fall because if this happens then talabani will take over who is more friendly towards pkk so you decide.
Its Realpolitik nothing else, dont get angry at me for telling the facts.
SouI
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2015
- Messages
- 1,831
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Well I am a Kemalist and I support this move too. They are our puppet and there is no reason why we shouldn't have puppets and use them.Is that why you use Ataturk on youre profile.
Everyone else is doing it so..
And an independent Kurdistan in the north of Iraq would only be in our benefit. We can even mass-deport PKK sympathizers there and do it LEGALLY too!
And them along with a Sunni Iraq would cut Iran off of this geography completely.
xenon54 out
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2013
- Messages
- 17,568
- Reaction score
- 20
- Country
- Location
I dont think its that easy.
Islamic faith&Secularism
BANNED
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2013
- Messages
- 4,224
- Reaction score
- -9
- Country
- Location
It is a fact that PKK terrorists get influence over norhtern Iraq from Mount Qandil to Kirkuk, Makhmour, Sinjar, and Rabia, they have even been given salary for that. However, that so called leader Barzani has taken no action against the PKK terrorists but some words to make happy Erdoğan. Even 1 or 2 months ago Iraqi PM Ibadi said they would not fight against the PKK terrorists in Iraq, just like Barzani said they would never fight with Kurds including PKK terrorists. Therefore, The pkk terrorists are so free that they walk in the streets of Kirkuk which is historically Turkmen and Arab city.
It is a fact that that so called Barzani took ''officially'' control of northern Iraq with help of Erdoğan.
It is fact that PYD took control of northern Syria with help of Erdoğan.
It is fact that HDP took control of South eastern Turkey with help of Erdoğan.
Any one is free to raise objection, then i am ready to prove those facts.
It is a fact that that so called Barzani took ''officially'' control of northern Iraq with help of Erdoğan.
It is fact that PYD took control of northern Syria with help of Erdoğan.
It is fact that HDP took control of South eastern Turkey with help of Erdoğan.
Any one is free to raise objection, then i am ready to prove those facts.
Last edited:
SouI
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2015
- Messages
- 1,831
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Why is that? They want Kurdistan, there is Kurdistan, a mutual agreement among states for exchange of citizenry, aand done!
Everyone is happy!
Zulkarneyn
BANNED
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2010
- Messages
- 2,633
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
I don't get you guys. Many of you supported deposing Erdogan, but when it comes to things you support most of his policies, including death penalty, supporting Peshmerge in Iraq or invasion in Syria. In other words Erdogan is the perfect "fascist" you wish (the only thing that bothers many is his islamic background)
Do you honestly think CHP would have taken the same road as AKP if they had beeen in power. AKP=expansionism CHP=pacifism. CHP (TODAY) basically stands for a weak Turkish Republic who act like servants to the West.
And you all need to think about the ramifications if another party other than AKP had been in power today. The Iraq invasion of 2003 still would have happened= thus chaos in Iraq (birth of ISIS).
Syria would still be in turmoil --> which lead to strenghtening of other factions like YPG/PKK and ISIS in Syria etc.
This would have meant Turkey would either need to remain calm and passive as Kilicdaroglu suggested or do the same as the current government --> carve North Syria to protect our borders. I don't think kilicdaroglu's CHP coul ever dare to touch North Syria. In fact i think he would say "Assad we respect your sovereigntny" while PKK/PYD would carve a nice area for themselves in Syria
Do you honestly think CHP would have taken the same road as AKP if they had beeen in power. AKP=expansionism CHP=pacifism. CHP (TODAY) basically stands for a weak Turkish Republic who act like servants to the West.
And you all need to think about the ramifications if another party other than AKP had been in power today. The Iraq invasion of 2003 still would have happened= thus chaos in Iraq (birth of ISIS).
Syria would still be in turmoil --> which lead to strenghtening of other factions like YPG/PKK and ISIS in Syria etc.
This would have meant Turkey would either need to remain calm and passive as Kilicdaroglu suggested or do the same as the current government --> carve North Syria to protect our borders. I don't think kilicdaroglu's CHP coul ever dare to touch North Syria. In fact i think he would say "Assad we respect your sovereigntny" while PKK/PYD would carve a nice area for themselves in Syria
Similar threads
