GURU DUTT
BANNED
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/General.jpg)
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2011
- Messages
- 14,363
- Reaction score
- -75
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think that.........having lesser depth, smaller area, makes PAF's operational requirements and tactics similar to israel and sweden. Smaller depth asks for preparing to be over run, as mentioned above. This requires for an ever-ready and proactive airforce. And so there has to be very good air surveillance beyond borders to allow for greater response time. In addition to multi-role aircrafts, PAF's greatest priority would be a very strong surveillance infrastructure. Addition of airborne radars was a very effective step. Further development and modernisation of local defence industry, on the lines of turkish model, would allow for local development of radars: static, mobile, and airborne, and prove to be the most effective factor for a robust air-defence.
But the problem is my friend you ain't Israel or Sweden and your so called enemy is unfortunately not like Egypt, Jordan or Syria. So may be its a good idea to think out of the box and keep focusing on good relations and economy.
i dont get the reason behind this thread can someone explain that in plain english![]()
But the problem is my friend you ain't Israel or Sweden and your so called enemy is unfortunately not like Egypt, Jordan or Syria. So may be its a good idea to think out of the box and keep focusing on good relations and economy.
Less to care for is perhaps not as important as much as having little to fall back on.
Sweden planned to be overrun.. but sweden was full of forest cover. All we have is desert.