*Awan*
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2009
- Messages
- 718
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
can you write on that particular plot.or at least pm me.thanks in advance.2 things
a.) we don't need to threaten israel or even think about them....i dont know why some people on this forum feel the need to want to pick fights with a country that is geographically far away; a country which today does not represent an existential threat to Pakistan. We foiled a nefarious plot of theirs some years ago, but since we went nuclear they haven't overtly been a threat to Pakistan. The fact that the indians feel cozy and want to cuddle with them should raise some eyebrows, but nothing to get paranoid about.
i don't understand why some of my country men have love for Israel?look at weapons India is getting from them.although it is understandable that they most sophisticated weapons in the world and Indians have money but there is upper limit of every thing.Americans are there for global policing.for example what is the need of introducing AWACS in this region,their input in indian air defense systems and many more.Also their presence in Kashmir,where indians are raising anti terrorist units with their help.
do you really think that Indians are capable of making their place on its own on world stage?
and what do you say about zionism?do you have any idea of it?do you really think that establishment of greater Israel is their ultimate goal?your say...
they were their to milk money from yanks,later that money was used in building Israeli military complex.what Israel has to do with Soviets?On soviet eradication from Afghanistan --an Islamic country -- the Mossad was actually on our side, ironically.
you have half information.why were they here at the very first place?We quietly allowed them to operate in FATA, under some watchful eye. This is confirmed.
actually few of them crossed the red line.we put bullets in their heads.and no one knows except 3-4 people where their bodies are buried.
does not hadith of Rasoolallah is enough on this topic?b.) Wahhabism is a 20th Century phenomenon. The Britishers --who were experts at the time at colonizing and screwing much of the developing world - needed Wahhabi movement to pick up pace so as to use them as a Bulwark against the Ottoman Khilafat --which, unfortunately, succeeded. The Brits used emotional and mental games -- promising to give them ''independence'' and an ''end to slavery'' in exchange for their resistance against the ''Osmanlilar''
actually things are not as simple as they are seem.in breaking of khilafat their was home work of 50 years.Ataturk was very smart, and picked up on this early -- as it is, the Ottomans were on their last legs.
jews penetrated upper ranks of powers.
we have results in shape of 'young turk" movement.
Though i dont agree with many policies of the General, and while i DO agree that many of the negative after-effects are being felt today --- I stand by General's decision to support the jihad against the soviets.
Not only did the soviets represent an existential threat to Pakistan --in her backyard; the soviets were instrumental in arming the indians. Pakistan was hungry for revenge, and Alhamdolillah, it was attained satisfactorily when the bear-huggers scurried home and the aggressive empire collapsed.
100% agreed.
i wonder why enemy of ZIa forget Soviet role in 71.no doubt revenge was due.