What's new

The CCP Didn’t Fight Imperial Japan; the KMT Did

Joseph Stilwell, a four star US general and the American commander of the Chinese theatre in WWII stated that he would rather work with CCP's army to fight the Japanese than KMT. In fact, it is this willingness that got him recalled.

Joseph Stilwell - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The rest of the article isn't really worth a reply. If someone in this day and age still believes these cold war propaganda pieces, they seriously need to get their head checked.
 
.
Dude, @Viet was saying the truth. CCP guerrila army were mostly peasants, and were poorly equipped. VN had a better start in the war with US. The early period of VN-France war was similary to CCP-Japan war: abandoning the cities, retreat to mountains, playing hide and seeks.
Truth, what's truth? CCP poorly equiped peasant army can't fight against Japan army?

If know nothing, suggest you shut you mouth up, and, don't always talk about "truth", you don't know more than others, except for deluding yourself, nothing else
 
Last edited:
.
There are so many official documents(Japan Defense Agency Version)that could show CCP played the most important role in the North China during 1938-1944.In fact,CCP contained at least 1/3 of [中国派遣军]Japanese china expeditionary forces(in a long term).Their efforts should be respected.
 
.
Hu Jintao: 中国国民党和中国共产党领导的抗日军队,分别担负着抗日战争中正面战场和敌后战场的作战任务"

谁是主角谁杀的日寇多,还不够明白?

Hu Jintao sucks ball, because a weakling like him allowed those KMT thugs to distort the history of CPC.

KMT is the enemy of the Chinese people, no question about that.
 
.
Why is Lux banned? Because he posted an article from the Diplomat? Gee, cannot we have different voices?

I think history can only be made clear after the CCP is no longer the dominating party in mainland, maybe in a century. It's pointless to argue now since most of us have been influenced by ideology and government sponsored education. Plus, the CCP has treated history as part of politics.

Sometimes, I lament that China has lost its long tradition of “信史” under which historians' only guiding principle is truth. That's why our Grand Historian can write about how Liu Bang, the founder of Han Dynasty, was a scoundrel and kicked his wife and kids off the cart when they were fleeing because they were too heavy! lol. Liu Bang also used devious schemes to escape his capture, etc, etc. Which historian in modern China dare write about Mao's personal life negatively? Or even dare write about the CCP in general negatively? I guess people here will just retort that Mao and the CCP are saints reborn. They are all uptight and cannot even be joked, lol. In this regard, I really respect our historians and emperors 2000 years ago.
 
.
Why is Lux banned? Because he posted an article from the Diplomat? Gee, cannot we have different voices?

I think history can only be made clear after the CCP is no longer the dominating party in mainland, maybe in a century. It's pointless to argue now since most of us have been influenced by ideology and government sponsored education. Plus, the CCP has treated history as part of politics.

Sometimes, I lament that China has lost its long tradition of “信史” under which historians' only guiding principle is truth. That's why our Grand Historian can write about how Liu Bang, the founder of Han Dynasty, was a scoundrel and kicked his wife and kids off the cart when they were fleeing because they were too heavy! lol. Liu Bang also used devious schemes to escape his capture, etc, etc. Which historian in modern China dare write about Mao's personal life negatively? Or even dare write about the CCP in general negatively? I guess people here will just retort that Mao and the CCP are saints reborn. They are all uptight and cannot even be joked, lol. In this regard, I really respect our historians and emperors 2000 years ago.

Dear, remember the old adage, "To the victor goes the spoils..." In regards to China's political mandate, the victor is the CPC. Its only natural for the current regime to identify the inefficiencies and failures of the past regime (KMT).
 
.
Why is Lux banned? Because he posted an article from the Diplomat? Gee, cannot we have different voices?

I think history can only be made clear after the CCP is no longer the dominating party in mainland, maybe in a century. It's pointless to argue now since most of us have been influenced by ideology and government sponsored education. Plus, the CCP has treated history as part of politics.

Sometimes, I lament that China has lost its long tradition of “信史” under which historians' only guiding principle is truth. That's why our Grand Historian can write about how Liu Bang, the founder of Han Dynasty, was a scoundrel and kicked his wife and kids off the cart when they were fleeing because they were too heavy! lol. Liu Bang also used devious schemes to escape his capture, etc, etc. Which historian in modern China dare write about Mao's personal life negatively? Or even dare write about the CCP in general negatively? I guess people here will just retort that Mao and the CCP are saints reborn. They are all uptight and cannot even be joked, lol. In this regard, I really respect our historians and emperors 2000 years ago.

Only in your dream KMT fanboy.

Your KMT will rot in the hell in for the eternity just like your beloved 常公公.

I generally despise DPP, but this is the only right thing they have done so far.

lWIc0AS.jpg
 
.
Only in your dream KMT fanboy.

Your KMT will rot in the hell in for the eternity just like your beloved 常公公.

I generally despise DPP, but this is the only right thing they have done so far.

lWIc0AS.jpg


Correct me if I'm wrong, but @ChineseTiger1986 , didn't you say your grandparents were KMT ? Shouldn't you have at least some respect for their sacrifice during their contributions in the war? Irrespective of ideological difference. Afterall, it was the KMT that bore the brunt of Imperial Japan's military offensives and strikes.
 
.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but @ChineseTiger1986 , didn't you say your grandparents were KMT ?

My great grandparents once worked for KMT, but I have no any attachment with that wrecked party.

KMT was the worst nightmare that ever happened to China, but of course you guys like them, because they made China weak and submissive in front of you.

CPC represents the strong China, of course you hate them.
 
Last edited:
. .
My great grandparents once worked for KMT, but I have no any attachment with that wrecking party.

KMT was the worst nightmare that ever happened to China, but of course you guys like them, because they made China weak and submissive in front of you.

CPC represents the strong China, of course you hate them.

I have no particular preference in either KMT or CPC, because that is not my call to prefer either since I am not Chinese. All I'm saying is that there should be some kind of respect, at least, by CPC supporters for KMT in their contribution in collectively fighting the war against Japan.

In regards to CPC, I am awed at their ability to lift over 700 million Chinese out of poverty, had the vision (thanks to Deng Xiaoping) to open to the capital market and allowed for the realization of China's industrial and manufacturing capabilities. In regards to that, and the CPC's fairly successful policies in harnessing the Chinese market, Chinese human capital -- I applaud that. As you know in my posts here, I may be opposed to Chinese military's intrusion into sensitive territories because I see it as destabilizing in the region. Besides that, however, I am fairly awed, amazed at the CPC's successful economic policies. Now there might be some issues I have qualms with, as in the case of Intellectual Property Rights violations, but I am optimistic that with enough foresight, CPC will eventually be considerate of its Western & Japanese partners.

My great grandparents once worked for KMT, but I have no any attachment with that wrecking party.

KMT was the worst nightmare that ever happened to China, but of course you guys like them, because they made China weak and submissive in front of you.

CPC represents the strong China, of course you hate them.

An example of how a victor shows respect to its vanquished opponent would be the United States Federal Government, which was victorious against the Confederate States Government after the Peace Treaty at Appomattox in 1865, after a bloody 4 year civil war. To this day, Americans still honor the rights of those Confederates who fought and died for their cause. Its an honor system.

I'm sure some CPC supporters honor the KMT dead who died for what they believed in.
 
.
Dear, remember the old adage, "To the victor goes the spoils..." In regards to China's political mandate, the victor is the CPC. Its only natural for the current regime to identify the inefficiencies and failures of the past regime (KMT).

The problem is that our tradition of history recording has never been like that. Our historians would record anything, good or bad, the ruling emperors' families or the last dynasties. That's why we can relatively be assured that our history books written by those historians can be trusted.

That's why I said the CCP has treated history as part of politics.
 
.
I have no particular preference in either KMT or CPC, because that is not my call to prefer either since I am not Chinese. All I'm saying is that there should be some kind of respect, at least, by CPC supporters for KMT in their contribution in collectively fighting the war against Japan.

KMT itself also had many different factions during the WWII, not all those KMT martyrs would be considered loyal to Chiang Kai Shek.

While Chiang could very likely persecute them as he considered many of the other factions as the CPC sympathizers.
 
.
I have no particular preference in either KMT or CPC, because that is not my call to prefer either since I am not Chinese. All I'm saying is that there should be some kind of respect, at least, by CPC supporters for KMT in their contribution in collectively fighting the war against Japan.

In regards to CPC, I am awed at their ability to lift over 700 million Chinese out of poverty, had the vision (thanks to Deng Xiaoping) to open to the capital market and allowed for the realization of China's industrial and manufacturing capabilities. In regards to that, and the CPC's fairly successful policies in harnessing the Chinese market, Chinese human capital -- I applaud that. As you know in my posts here, I may be opposed to Chinese military's intrusion into sensitive territories because I see it as destabilizing in the region. Besides that, however, I am fairly awed, amazed at the CPC's successful economic policies. Now there might be some issues I have qualms with, as in the case of Intellectual Property Rights violations, but I am optimistic that with enough foresight, CPC will eventually be considerate of its Western & Japanese partners.



An example of how a victor shows respect to its vanquished opponent would be the United States Federal Government, which was victorious against the Confederate States Government after the Peace Treaty at Appomattox in 1865, after a bloody 4 year civil war. To this day, Americans still honor the rights of those Confederates who fought and died for their cause. Its an honor system.

I'm sure some CPC supporters honor the KMT dead who died for what they believed in.

People like him are tiny minority in China. If you go to Chinese forums, most, if not overwhelming majority, recognized that KMT army are also Chinese that sacrificed their lives for the country. I am really suspicious of his true identity and have long ignored him.
 
.
People like him are tiny minority in China. If you go to Chinese forums, most, of not overwhelming majority, recognized that KMT army are also Chinese that sacrificed their lives for the country. I am really suspicious of his true identity and have long ignored him.

Don't lie, go to Tianya/Baidu/Tiexue, you will see who is the true minority there, you delusional KMT fanboy.

Only 果粉 are considered as the retarded minorities in China.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom