Awesome
RETIRED MOD
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2006
- Messages
- 22,023
- Reaction score
- 5
I dont need to.. Its between UN and Pakistan.. As per a binding resolution of UNSC, Hafiz Saeed is a terrorist and JuD a terror outfit, unless proven other wise..
Since the UN has not done anything it must be okay with it, with us pursuing the Mumbai attackers across borders and trying them in court. The case is still going on, and will conclude if India would let it.
Officially India has acknowledged that the state was not involved. Officially India has demanded trials in Pakistan. Officially India has even complained that we have not done enough. Why that drama then?India still does not believe that the Mumbai incident was purely driven by non state actors and there is a fair bit of confidence in Pakistan state machinery's complicity in the whole episode. Hence it does not make any sense to allow anyone from that machinery to communicate with Kasab
Pick one side and stick to it. Or is my first assertion true that India is milking points out of the deaths of 170 people?
What kind of evedince didyou get from the Americans to support the WOT? Or did they give you any for the OBL raid?
Obviously thats why everyone criticized the American attack, it was against the norms of justice practiced all over the world. The details that have come out was that OBL did not resist arrest and yet they shot him. If Hafiz Saeed had not turned himself in, and would have resisted arrest, Pakistan would have shot him too.
There is no question pakistan is complicit and protects terrorists. Even when they pretend to ban them under international pressure, they are just allowed to operate just by changing nameplate, or even allowed to do fundraising through ads in mainstream newspapers. The pakistani state, judiciary and lots of common people keep full sympathy for these terrorists. Otherwise what kind of non parriah state asks for evidence of foreign countries on terrorists who live, organise, operate, plan, train, raise funds within own borders???
Did you try colonel Purohit or did you hang him in town square? You even tried the insidious Modi and found him not guilty, why didn't you just put a bullet through his head?
Btw, India started the exchange of evidence with the dossier, only it was not good enough, so now we are asking for more. This concept has precedence laid by India - and trial investigations can run between borders - aren't you trying to bring Dawood Ibrahim to justice?
You personal opinions aside, our actions have been by the book - but you have suddenly started to pretend to be too illiterate to follow the book.