Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Kyoon Nahi..?? Just because PAF has an old version of the same plane?
i always liked f-16...a true multi role fighter. I dont think PAF having f-16\'s will deter IAF from going for it. We\'ll be having a much advanced version & more numbers. Our second line fighter will be much more capable than enemy\'s frontline fighter . IAF would be then using python 5, R-77, AIM and NIRBHAY!!
Remember Israel also advised us to go for f-16..maybe there will be ease of inter-operability between IsAF and InAF!!!
i always liked f-16...a true multi role fighter. I dont think PAF having f-16\'s will deter IAF from going for it. We\'ll be having a much advanced version & more numbers. Our second line fighter will be much more capable than enemy\'s frontline fighter . IAF would be then using python 5, R-77, AIM and NIRBHAY!!
Remember Israel also advised us to go for f-16..maybe there will be ease of inter-operability between IsAF and InAF!!!
the problem is not with f 16 .no doubt that it is a excellent war plane with a good record...the problem is usa,its tot and source codes.and it being a pain in the *** after the sales of weapon.
Yes ToT would be a problem but im not a big fan of this ToT. If we are getting what we want then why dont we go for it? Regarding sales,if need demands cant we go for third party sources?
TOT is a problem for uncle Sam. It\'s just assumed.Is ToT a problem for LM or Boeing? Has this been verified or just assumed?
I dont think ToT is allowed under FMS.
Is ToT a problem for LM or Boeing? Has this been verified or just assumed?