What's new

The Benazir Bhutto, I knew was no hero!

A.Rahman

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
4,727
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
Published : January 08, 2008 | Author : David Warren
Total Visits: 101 Print | Email to friend
0 reviews | Write a review


Like Benazir Bhutto, England’s "Good Queen Bess" did not rise to the throne in 1558 on a wave of democracy and feminism. She rose as the daughter of the (murderous) Henry VIII. It is the failure to grasp such simple facts that makes so much western journalism ridiculous.

By DAVID WARREN

The Ottawa Citizen

OTTAWA, Canada—The queen is dead, long live the king. This is the message from Pakistan's "People's Party," founded 40 years ago by Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto as the machine to advance his own political career.

At his death by judicial murder, the machine was inherited by his daughter – with competition from his sons until both had died mysteriously.

And at Benazir Bhutto's death, it is now inherited by her 19-year-old son, Bilawal, under the guardianship of his corrupt father.


The many prize idiots in the western media who presented Ms. Bhutto as a beacon of democracy are now perhaps beginning to grasp what path she was lighting.


The creed of the PPP – "Islam is our faith, democracy is our politics, socialism is our economy, all power to the people" – consists of three calculated lies followed by a howler.


A more honest creed might be, "Government of the Bhutto, by the Bhutto, and for the Bhutto."


By the accident of holiday schedules, I was relieved of the burden of writing about the assassination for the next day. Happily (a relative term), because, as we say in Latin, De mortuis, nihil nisi bonum. Of the dead, speak nothing but good. But now, a few days have passed.

Those who thought Ms. Bhutto the agent of democracy and progress, because she was young and a woman and told them in fluent English exactly what they wanted to hear, should know that she, like every other woman who has risen to power in the region, including a prime minister of India, two in Bangladesh, and now two in Sri Lanka -- inherited dynasties founded by powerful men.

The (murderous) "Good Queen Bess" did not rise to the throne in 1558 on a wave of democracy and feminism in late mediaeval England. She rose as the daughter of the (murderous) Henry VIII. It is the failure to grasp such simple facts that makes so much western journalism ridiculous.

I have been reading much rubbish in celebration of Ms. Bhutto's life. A number of my fellow pundits have further provided personal memoirs: it seems dozens of them were her next door neighbor when she was studying at Harvard or Oxford or both.

She was my exact contemporary, and I met her as a child in Pakistan, so let me jump on this bandwagon. I remember her at age eight, arriving in a Mercedes-Benz with daddy's driver, and whisking me off for a ride in the private airplane of then-president Ayub Khan (Bhutto père was the rising star in his cabinet). This girl was the most spoiled brat I ever met.

I met her again in London, when she was studying at Oxford. She was the same, only now the 22-year-old version, and too gorgeous for anybody's good. One of my memories is a glimpse inside a two-door fridge: one door entirely filled with packages of chocolate rum balls from Harrod's.

Benazir was crashing, in West Kensington, with another girl I knew in passing -- the daughter of a former prime minister of Iraq. They were having a party. It would be hard to imagine two girls, of any cultural background, so glibly hedonistic.

After her father's "martyrdom" Bhutto became, from all reports, much more serious. But I think, also, twisted -- and easily twisted, as the spoiled too easily become when they are confronted with tragedy.

She became pure politician. Think of it: she submitted to an arranged marriage, because she needed a husband to campaign for office. Stood by him in power only because there was no other political option when he proved even greedier than she was.

Twisted, in a nearly schizoid way. For she was entirely westernized, but also Pakistani.

She thought in English, her Urdu was awkward, her "native" Sindhi inadequate even for giving directions to servants. Part of her political trick, in Pakistan itself, was that she sounded uneducated in Urdu. This is as close as she got to being "a woman of the people."

Brave, unquestionably brave. Which I would qualify by adding it was one facet of a wilfulness not otherwise attractive.

She was irresponsible to make her assassin's job so easy, by campaigning in plain-air after what had happened in Karachi; wrong to lure so many to their own deaths around her.

Faced with the actual problems of Pakistan, she twice made a disastrous prime minister.

Her death obviates a third term. But the legacy creates as large a mess. She tutored her supporters to blame President Pervez Musharraf for any harm that might come to her, so that when al-Qaeda pulled off the murder, they scored twice.

In addition to killing a hated symbol of westernization, they set the mobs not against themselves, but against Mr. Musharraf. As I have argued before in these columns, for all his visible faults, Mr. Musharraf has been dealing to the limit of his abilities and opportunities with the actual problems of Pakistan.

David Warren's column appears Sunday, Wednesday and Saturday in the Ottawa Citizen.


© The Ottawa Citizen 2008
 
Finally, one western reporter wakes up.

The many prize idiots in the western media who presented Ms. Bhutto as a beacon of democracy are now perhaps beginning to grasp what path she was lighting.

Western media should not be influencing Pakistani politics. It's interference. Musharraf should remain firm and forget Pakistan's image in the West. Whatever he does, he will be portrayed as villainous. Funny the way he's going to win a significant portion of the votes though.
 
Finally, one western reporter wakes up.



Western media should not be influencing Pakistani politics. It's interference. Musharraf should remain firm and forget Pakistan's image in the West. Whatever he does, he will be portrayed as villainous. Funny the way he's going to win a significant portion of the votes though.

Well said.
 
Can anyone list both positive and negative records of BB please?

such as...

Efforts on:
education
health care
social welfare
elevating the position of women
civil liberties
freedom of the press
privatization

Yet hated by
overruling proposal of elevating the position of immigrants
making her corrupt husband Minister of investment
serious corruptions
 
Can anyone list both positive and negative records of BB please?

such as...

Efforts on:
education
health care
social welfare
elevating the position of women
civil liberties
freedom of the press
privatization

Yet hated by
overruling proposal of elevating the position of immigrants
making her corrupt husband Minister of investment
serious corruptions

Good points. Let's see what Benazir did..

Elevating the position of women
  • Hudood Law remained in place throughout both her terms.
  • Provided support to the Taliban

Privatization
  • Everything was privatized to the tune of 10%

Economy

The only thing that may have improved under Benazir was education, but since every single Pakistani government has improved education standards, this is no big thing. Taking the country to default, reducing product production, investment and slicing off 10% of all things Pakistan as well as not holding any promises on improving women's rights were perhaps her main achievements.
 
Good Points hmmm.

The JF-17 project,
K8 Project,
NO load shedding during her era lots of Power station deployed for development stopped by Zia elements,
Missile development program,
Space Program (launching of Pakistan's first satellite),
Mass Transit system installed in Karachi,
Anti Zia,
Attacking MQM terrorist.
And many many more positives,

And so on
 
Good Points hmmm.

The JF-17 project,

Not according to Pakistan Times

"The project was conceived during the then prime minister Nawaz Sharif’s first regime in the early 90s. The first test flight of the supersonic jet was successfully conducted in September 2003 in China."
Pakistan Times | Top Story: JF-17 jets to be inducted by Pakistan Air Force next year

K8 Project,

Not sure who dreamt up this. I'm pretty sure it wasn't Benazir Bhutto though.

NO load shedding during her era lots of Power station deployed for development stopped by Zia elements,

Oh pulease. Bhutto's stint in power was not an electrical miracle. No need to overinflate things by lying outright.

Missile development program,
Space Program (launching of Pakistan's first satellite),
Mass Transit system installed in Karachi,
Anti Zia,
Attacking MQM terrorist.
And many many more positives,

And so on

How do all these "positives" (if she really did any of them), outweight or justify stealing 10% of everything and taking the country to default when it could not even get loans?
 
JF-17 negotiation happened during her tenure its on records and it may as well be that that project started in Nawaz term but it was setup by her.

Same goes for K8 it was during her term like it or not, infact Pakistans defence was created by the Bhutto tenure. Building of Wah oridinance, Nuclear program and missle program.
Something that a drunk general wouldn't know.
 
JF-17 negotiation happened during her tenure its on records and it may as well be that that project started in Nawaz term but it was setup by her.

Same goes for K8 it was during her term like it or not, infact Pakistans defence was created by the Bhutto tenure. Building of Wah oridinance, Nuclear program and missle program.
Something that a drunk general wouldn't know.

suggest u defend your claims by facts & figures instead of just mere conjecture and rhetoric (PPP jiyalas are famous for it)
 
Published : January 08, 2008 | Author : David Warren
Total Visits: 101 Print | Email to friend
0 reviews | Write a review


Like Benazir Bhutto, England’s "Good Queen Bess" did not rise to the throne in 1558 on a wave of democracy and feminism. She rose as the daughter of the (murderous) Henry VIII. It is the failure to grasp such simple facts that makes so much western journalism ridiculous.

By DAVID WARREN

The Ottawa Citizen

OTTAWA, Canada—The queen is dead, long live the king. This is the message from Pakistan's "People's Party," founded 40 years ago by Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto as the machine to advance his own political career.

At his death by judicial murder, the machine was inherited by his daughter – with competition from his sons until both had died mysteriously.

And at Benazir Bhutto's death, it is now inherited by her 19-year-old son, Bilawal, under the guardianship of his corrupt father.


The many prize idiots in the western media who presented Ms. Bhutto as a beacon of democracy are now perhaps beginning to grasp what path she was lighting.


The creed of the PPP – "Islam is our faith, democracy is our politics, socialism is our economy, all power to the people" – consists of three calculated lies followed by a howler.


A more honest creed might be, "Government of the Bhutto, by the Bhutto, and for the Bhutto."


By the accident of holiday schedules, I was relieved of the burden of writing about the assassination for the next day. Happily (a relative term), because, as we say in Latin, De mortuis, nihil nisi bonum. Of the dead, speak nothing but good. But now, a few days have passed.

Those who thought Ms. Bhutto the agent of democracy and progress, because she was young and a woman and told them in fluent English exactly what they wanted to hear, should know that she, like every other woman who has risen to power in the region, including a prime minister of India, two in Bangladesh, and now two in Sri Lanka -- inherited dynasties founded by powerful men.

The (murderous) "Good Queen Bess" did not rise to the throne in 1558 on a wave of democracy and feminism in late mediaeval England. She rose as the daughter of the (murderous) Henry VIII. It is the failure to grasp such simple facts that makes so much western journalism ridiculous.

I have been reading much rubbish in celebration of Ms. Bhutto's life. A number of my fellow pundits have further provided personal memoirs: it seems dozens of them were her next door neighbor when she was studying at Harvard or Oxford or both.

She was my exact contemporary, and I met her as a child in Pakistan, so let me jump on this bandwagon. I remember her at age eight, arriving in a Mercedes-Benz with daddy's driver, and whisking me off for a ride in the private airplane of then-president Ayub Khan (Bhutto père was the rising star in his cabinet). This girl was the most spoiled brat I ever met.

I met her again in London, when she was studying at Oxford. She was the same, only now the 22-year-old version, and too gorgeous for anybody's good. One of my memories is a glimpse inside a two-door fridge: one door entirely filled with packages of chocolate rum balls from Harrod's.

Benazir was crashing, in West Kensington, with another girl I knew in passing -- the daughter of a former prime minister of Iraq. They were having a party. It would be hard to imagine two girls, of any cultural background, so glibly hedonistic.

After her father's "martyrdom" Bhutto became, from all reports, much more serious. But I think, also, twisted -- and easily twisted, as the spoiled too easily become when they are confronted with tragedy.

She became pure politician. Think of it: she submitted to an arranged marriage, because she needed a husband to campaign for office. Stood by him in power only because there was no other political option when he proved even greedier than she was.

Twisted, in a nearly schizoid way. For she was entirely westernized, but also Pakistani.

She thought in English, her Urdu was awkward, her "native" Sindhi inadequate even for giving directions to servants. Part of her political trick, in Pakistan itself, was that she sounded uneducated in Urdu. This is as close as she got to being "a woman of the people."

Brave, unquestionably brave. Which I would qualify by adding it was one facet of a wilfulness not otherwise attractive.

She was irresponsible to make her assassin's job so easy, by campaigning in plain-air after what had happened in Karachi; wrong to lure so many to their own deaths around her.

Faced with the actual problems of Pakistan, she twice made a disastrous prime minister.

Her death obviates a third term. But the legacy creates as large a mess. She tutored her supporters to blame President Pervez Musharraf for any harm that might come to her, so that when al-Qaeda pulled off the murder, they scored twice.

In addition to killing a hated symbol of westernization, they set the mobs not against themselves, but against Mr. Musharraf. As I have argued before in these columns, for all his visible faults, Mr. Musharraf has been dealing to the limit of his abilities and opportunities with the actual problems of Pakistan.

David Warren's column appears Sunday, Wednesday and Saturday in the Ottawa Citizen.


© The Ottawa Citizen 2008

hear! hear!
 
I have said this before, but I'll just repeat myself here:

I think that those who say that Bhutto was corrupt are missing the point.

Corrupt or not, she was a popular leader, capable of standing up to the Taliban ideology.

Lets face it: Mushy, though effective, is not popular.
 
Popular he is not Musharraf effective he is not only for those who are benefiting from him. The country is in shambles and he only wants to stay longer.

People on this forum support him because he is Part of the MQM and Q-league establishment which are two cheeks of the same arse.
 
I have said this before, but I'll just repeat myself here:

I think that those who say that Bhutto was corrupt are missing the point.

Corrupt or not, she was a popular leader, capable of standing up to the Taliban ideology.

Lets face it: Mushy, though effective, is not popular.

This post just oozes dumbness. She was "capable of standing up to the Taliban ideology", which she helped foster.

"Missing the point on corruption" when someone nearly bankrupts the economy by slicing off 10% of all investment, driving away FDI, stealing the reserves, and mismanaging the economy, is definitely not the point :cheesy:. Let's overlook "minor points" to her politicial career and focus on the major points, such as attacking MQM (her political rivals for Sindh of course).

As for Musharraf not being popular. He is one of the most popular leaders in Punjab, and that has half the voters. Balochistan would vote in quite a high percentage for Musharraf also.
 
Popular he is not Musharraf effective he is not only for those who are benefiting from him. The country is in shambles and he only wants to stay longer.

People on this forum support him because he is Part of the MQM and Q-league establishment which are two cheeks of the same arse.

first i'm anti muhajir, now i'm pro muhajir. make your minds up! I'm pretty neutral in this. I see Musharraf as Pakistan's best hope for a better future. Not these corrupt, feudal political parties.
 
first i'm anti muhajir, now i'm pro muhajir. make your minds up! I'm pretty neutral in this. I see Musharraf as Pakistan's best hope for a better future. Not these corrupt, feudal political parties.

Correcto ............ :cheers:
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom