The B-21 Bomber will officially rollout to the public the first week of December: USAF

[patero]

The B-21 will be the first ELO (extremely low observable) class aircraft ever produced to date.

Do you think they will use the new ceramic based RAM? The guy who runs the sandbox youtube channel had been talking about it a bit lately, but mainly in reference to NGAD.

 

[Goritoes]

According to my source in Area 52, the delays came from test flight over China. We needed a few tweaks.

According to my Sources in Area 53.5, there was due to Queen's death

 

[khansaheeb]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1572260415211700225

So excited!

Looks like something out of a batman movie.

 

[S10]

That would be in the billions.

Low double digits at best

 

[FOOLS_NIGHTMARE]

 

[jhungary]

B21 is only a mid term modification of B2, not an upgrade. Its biggest advantage is that it is only 30% of the cost of B2 ($651 million: $2.1 billion).


If you have different opinions, please explain the reasons carefully and show the data source.

I found that you have a perpent of asking people to proof their point when you yourself did not do the same.

Proof to me how B21 only advantage is 30% cheaper than B2, and I will proof to you why it is not. Deal or GTFO.

 

[MH.Yang]

I found that you have a perpent of asking people to proof their point when you yourself did not do the same.

Proof to me how B21 only advantage is 30% cheaper than B2, and I will proof to you why it is not. Deal or GTFO.

The OP said that B21 is the 6G aircraft.

Who claims and who provides evidence?

Shouldn't the OP first prove that it is a 6G aircraft?

 

[gambit]

Low double digits at best

Considering the intent of 'stealth' and precision weapons is to deliver the minimum to achieve results that disproportionately outsize the efforts, that would be analogous to how little intellectual efforts does it take me to debunk Chinese claims. I do not need more than a few brain cells, and have done such little, to show the readers how the PDF Chinese cohort consistently misled and lied to the readers.

 

[jhungary]

The OP said that B21 is the 6G aircraft.

Who claims and who provides evidence?

Shouldn't the OP first prove that it is a 6G aircraft?

Wow, how do you lie thru your teeth when there is a record of EVERY POST in this forum?

OP did not claim this is a 6G bomber until you made a comment on it is only the cheap version of B2.

Tell me which post is first? Your's or his?

6G was not mentioned until you said "There is no money left, let's build a cheap version of B2"

So, Liar, YOU need to proof B21 is a cheaper version of B2 first. Not the other way around.

 

[gambit]

The OP said that B21 is the 6G aircraft.

Who claims and who provides evidence?

Shouldn't the OP first prove that it is a 6G aircraft?

Fine. The B-21 is nothing more than the first experimental flying wing designs back in the 1920s.

 

[MH.Yang]

Wow, how do you lie thru your teeth when there is a record of EVERY POST in this forum?

OP did not claim this is a 6G bomber until you made a comment on it is only the cheap version of B2.

Tell me which post is first? Your's or his?

View attachment 881465

6G was not mentioned until you said "There is no money left, let's build a cheap version of B2"

So, Liar, YOU need to proof B21 is a cheaper version of B2 first. Not the other way around.

I can proved it. 30% of the cost of B2, which can prove cheap. The United States has repeatedly postponed its military spending plan, which can prove that it has no money. As for the relationship between B21 and B2, this is your opinion. Do you think B21 has nothing to do with B2?

 

[jhungary]

I can proved it. 30% of the cost of B2, which can prove cheap. The United States has repeatedly postponed its military spending plan, which can prove that it has no money. As for the relationship between B21 and B2, this is your opinion. Do you think B21 has nothing to do with B2?

Pothead, You need to prove they are JUST 30% cheaper than B2 AND NOTHING ELSE.

Not whether or not you can proof it is 30% cheaper.

Let me give you a hint in case you are too stupid to understand, unless you worked for Lockheed Martin Shunkworks, YOU CAN NEVER PROVE IT because it has not release in detail yet. Which mean you can't basically prove this is 30% cheaper than B2.

So did you work for Lockheed Martin?

 

[MH.Yang]

Pothead, You need to prove they are JUST 30% cheaper than B2 AND NOTHING ELSE.

Not whether or not you can proof it is 30% cheaper.

B21 costs US $651 million, and B2 costs US $2.1 billion. B21 is 30% of the cost of B2, isn't it obvious?

Now it's your turn to prove that B21 is a 6G fighter and its capability is much better than B2.

 

[gambit]

Now it's your turn to prove that B21 is a 6G fighter and its capability is much better than B2.

For starter, the B-21's shaping is cleaner than the B-2 just by visual assessment which implies that the B-21's RCS will be even lower than the B-2's.

 

[jhungary]

B21 costs US $651 million, and B2 costs US $2.1 billion. B21 is 30% of the cost of B2, isn't it obvious?

Now it's your turn to prove that B21 is a 6G fighter and its capability is much better than B2.

Oh now you work for US Department of Defence? How do you know how much B21 Cost to be exact?

B2 were projected to cost 737 million per in 1989, when they were in project state, which is the same state as B21 now, so either you can see into the future, or have insider knowledge as to how much B21 is going to cost the DoD to buy, you have proven shit bro.