What's new

Terrorist takes Australian cafe customers hostage:

Terrorist Mulla put to the fires of hell:

B45vJZ-IIAAhBve.jpg:large
 
.
You don't know him from the other two Arab forums. I do however. He even declared me a Kafir Murtad in one of them by the way. And he always posts pro-ISIS propaganda there. I know him, you don't. Now you get back trying to prove Arab racial supremacy for some mysterious reason and let me go back to hating all religious scumbags and we can all do our thing.

No, I don't. Did I say that I did? I base my interaction with people here on what they write on PDF. I have no idea if people I respect are pedophiles in their free time for instance. How can I? That's sad if true and I hope that he learns from his mistakes.

What "Arab racial supremacy". I am not even fully Arab and I don't understand that part of your reply. I just gave examples of what I consider genuine struggles and not terrorism. Palestine being one of such struggles. I believe that I can be allowed to criticize certain Western policies without being labeled alongside ISIS for instance. I also believe that I can point out that the coalition bombings have killed innocents and that I also condemn.

Anyway let's leave that. We are off-topic.
 
.
He converted Wahabism? So that's it. The cat is finally out of the bag. 99.9% of international terrorist incidents have been tracked back to paradise desperate wahabis. Can we ban Wahabism now? Will the Americans now stop supporting regimes that export wahabism through the petro-dollars? I doubt it...

What proof do you have that he "converted to Wahhabism" because he did something violent? And what is Wahhabism? There is no such thing, there never was and never will be such a thing. Sectarian A-holes like you are no different than terrorists and their supporters.
 
. . .
What proof do you have that he "converted to Wahhabism" because he did something violent? And what is Wahhabism? There is no such thing, there never was and never will be such a thing. Sectarian A-holes like you are no different than terrorists and their supporters.

The funny thing with that guy is that he spends his entire time on PDF crying about sectarianism (being an Ahmadi you probably live in a constant cycle of Stockholm Syndrome) yet he is sectarian as hell to the core when it comes down to it from what I have seen. Especially against Arabs. Pretty ironic I would say. Expect a reply of epic proportions now involving several seizures and tantrums that would make a 3 year old proud.
 
.
Very simple to see how wrong that mentality is.

How is every Australian is a legitimate target? And you never fail to disappoint me as the Baghdadi cook sucker we all know you to be. There is a thing called Civilians and unarmed people you know, but terrorists and their supporters are indeed the scum of the earth and do not know that. So depending on that logic even Aussie kids right? What about Kangaroos? Should we start installing body guards to Kangaroos as well?

I'm here putting myself in ISIS shoes, why hasn't ISIS attacked let's say Sweden? Austria? Switzerland? Poland? Finland? and other Western/European nations that were not involved in the coalition against them? only the countries that decided to bomb them with the US are under threat, don't want to be under threat of attacks on your soil? then stop sticking your nose in their business, Also i don't agree with ISIS in attacking their civilians but from an ISIS point of view they're absolutely legitimate, also let's not forget that many civilians in ISIS controlled areas were killed due to the coalition bombings.


Saudi Arabia has been bombing ISIS targets. Are Saudis a legitimate target in your book?

My book? :crazy:

From an ISIS point of view yes Saudis are a legitimate target,
 
.
Is Australia involved in the coalition against ISIS? then every Australian is a legitimate target for them, very simple.
that disgusting psychopath just pissed these guys off, those animals in Iraq/Syria can expect a few more care packages now :agree:

special delivery from Straya
Australia.gif

1653698_808102789248088_8313984847541580845_n-jpg.157636

10635984_808102775914756_7985159622828459087_n-jpg.157642
 
.
What proof do you have that he "converted to Wahhabism" because he did something violent? And what is Wahhabism? There is no such thing, there never was and never will be such a thing. Sectarian A-holes like you are no different than terrorists and their supporters.

He says so on his websites. And the correlation between a wahabi and violent incidents is quite high. Wahabism is extremist ideology followed by 99% of all international extremist groups. I am not a sectarian, Wahabism is an extremist political fascist ideology, I am an anti fascist not a sectarian.

You want to know the difference between me and terrorists? I have never supported, excused, condoned a terrorist attack. Now stop defending fascist wahabis.
 
.
.
What proof do you have that he "converted to Wahhabism" because he did something violent? And what is Wahhabism? There is no such thing, there never was and never will be such a thing. Sectarian A-holes like you are no different than terrorists and their supporters.

Only deluded individuals think there is nothing such as wahabbism

Wahhabism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
.
He says so on his websites. And the correlation between a wahabi and violent incidents is quite high. Wahabism is extremist ideology followed by 99% of all international extremist groups. I am not a sectarian, Wahabism is an extremist political fascist ideology, I am an anti fascist not a sectarian.

You want to know the difference between me and terrorists? I have never supported, excused, condoned a terrorist attack. Now stop defending fascist wahabis.

Define Wahhabism to me? And who are the ones who call themselves Wahhabis? Bring me the sub-set of group that openly declares themselves Wahahbis? I will be waiting. Oh and Wikipedia article is not a valid source and if you bring it I already discredit it a thousand times already.
 
.
What proof do you have that he "converted to Wahhabism" because he did something violent? And what is Wahhabism? There is no such thing, there never was and never will be such a thing. Sectarian A-holes like you are no different than terrorists and their supporters.
this is what he said in his FB account :

In December 2014 Haron announced that he used to be a Rafidi [shia] but he had converted to Islam [added by me : probably he means wahhabism], he announced it both on his website and his Facebook Page
 
.
I'm here putting myself in ISIS shoes, why hasn't ISIS attacked let's say Sweden? Austria? Switzerland? Poland? Finland? and other Western/European nations that were not involved in the coalition against them? only the countries that decided to bomb them with the US are under threat, don't want to be under threat of attacks on your soil? then stop sticking your nose in their business, Also i don't agree with ISIS in attacking their civilians but from an ISIS point of view they're absolutely legitimate, also let's not forget that many civilians in ISIS controlled areas were killed due to the coalition bombings.




My book? :crazy:

From an ISIS point of view yes Saudis are a legitimate target,

My book is a saying not meant to be offensive or was I implying I was talking about the Quran or any religious book me being a Muslim and all would be rather odd thing for me to say LOL. Like I said to al-hasani if I have misread you then that’s my mistake and I take it back.
 
.
This Religious Nutjob called Haron Monis was already accused in many vicious crimes including murder; and then he was let out on bail! To do this Hostage-taking!
Australia and all the Western countries will do well to seek out, search out and round up all these Religious Morons; or else they will have to face up to more re-plays of such incidents.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom