karan.1970
BANNED
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/General.jpg)
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2010
- Messages
- 14,781
- Reaction score
- -20
- Country
- Location
No it doesn't apply. Jinnah did something truly reasonable to bring Kashmir into fold of Pakistan and to save it from a ruthless illegitimate occupation of India. It was a true service of Pakistan. Don't know what Modi was liberating when those infamous riots of Gujrat happened. Don't know who those riots were a service of India unless you guys think killing Indian muslims is service to India.
No.. He did not. He did what Taliban did in Afghanistan. And we all know what they are called .. Dont we? And Jinnah was the ruler of a country and had an army and still went down the path of cross border terrorism. and admitted to it
Modi has not been found guilty of any rubbish that Pakistani members (and some Indians I admit) routinely blame him for . Who do you think I would rather believe.. A bunch of fanboys or the judicial system.
Since you were showing sympathy for Pakistani shais and Ahmadis. I don't know how many shias and ahmadis were killed by common masses on the charges of blasphemy. I think you are trying to mix two different issues here.
Shias, ahmadiyas, Hindus, Christians are all fair game in Pakistan
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/10/w...through-mosque-in-peshawar-pakistan.html?_r=0
Christians in Pakistan sentenced to death over a text - Telegraph
You are being redirected...
Pak: Mob attacks temple, sets dharamshala ablaze - Hindustan Times