AfrazulMandal
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2018
- Messages
- 3,289
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
I am a teacher of history. I find it funny when someone uses Ram Puniyani as a historian. He quotes Eaton.Agree with me or not, you just have to realize how retarded you are for throwing around fake numbers and fairy tales.
Every religion on Earth has had it's holy places destroyed or desecrated at one point or another. Monkey worshipers are not special.
The only difference is that you people think that it was done in the name of religion and it was done systematically. In reality it was done due to politics and only selectively. The only religious group in the modern world who destroy holy places are Hindus, destroying Mosques and Churches.
Honestly, watch this video. One of the few sane Indians in the world and he is an actual Dr.
Unlike most hindutva scum who don't even know how to use a toilet.
That is 1, waiting for the next 39,999 picture of proof.
I beg you - please read Eaton yourself. He clearly says 80 major instances of temple destruction not 80 temples destroyed.
The primary motive by this argument - Muslims destroyed temples - is to put Muslims on the backfoot.
My answer to this is simple. Yes, our forefathers destroyed temples as they were capitals of ignorance and superstition and this is the path of the Prophet pbuh. We should never be ashamed about this tradition. We should celebrate our valor and our capability instead of hiding and lying.
The only reason there is no dispute over Mecca is that ALL Arab pagans accepted Islam.Hindus also claim Makkah and especially the Kaaba is a hindu temple. Thats how deluded these people are.
If Hinduism was present in the Arabian peninsula it would be documented. Early Muslims would have most likely interacted with Hindus but such a thing has never happened as the Early Muslims interacted with Arab Pagans or Semitic Polythiests, Jews, Christians and Zoroastians.
The Muslim rulers of India must share this responsibility. For them ayashi was more important than spreading the faith. We would never have had this conflict.
Umm. The firmans exist that allowed this demolition to happen.What if that temple was private,when owner changed his religion he altered place of worship also?
What if someone has private temple and he becomes Muslims?
That's their religion,it's better not to insult it,since insult usually would be paid back by insult and Allah Almighty has clearly directed;
Surah Al-An'am
And do not insult those they invoke other than Allah, lest they insult Allah in enmity without knowledge. Thus We have made pleasing to every community their deeds. Then to their Lord is their return, and He will inform them about what they used to do.[6:108]
no.Hindus claim this site is important to them as Mecca is to Muslims then Indian Muslims out of goodwill should stop challenging the decision and withdraw their complaint and help Hindus rebuild one of their holiest sites.
Whether its really the birth place of Ram is irrelevant because Ram may or may not have existed but its part of Hindu mythology. Now you could make fun of Hindu mythology but that opens ridicule to every religion and trust me everyone know people would be ready to kill or be killed if their mythology are challenged.