Tejas, a poor performer?

[Chhatrapati]

You mean 6 whole squadrons?
How many aircraft per squadron?

No, just one squadron with 6 planes.

 

[rcrmj]

first you need to be a performer, and then, based on your skills, that can be put in groups of good and bad`````LCA is a joke in modern aviation industry, it is a total farce and hoax as simple as that, no matter how those funny, denial and ignorant Indian trying to pull those ludicrous excuses

 

[Rashid Mahmood]

No, just one squadron with 6 planes.

Ok Thanks.

 

[seesonic]

Here comes a racist bigot. What this has to do with him being black or white?


I think it was 6 including a prototype.

Take your ₹50 and get yourself another pair

 

[Chhatrapati]

Take your ₹50 and get yourself another pair

Keep crying.

 

[seesonic]

Keep crying.

Another ₹50 for a pack of tissue

 

[SQ8]

Nothing wrong as such with the design which was supposed to mimic the m2k but poor project management has left it closer to a Mirage-III.

Sadly, Indian fanboys will do whatever loghorrea to twist physics and mathematics to prove that the Delta which even Dassault and Four much much more experienced European Aircraft design bureaus with the Eurofighter were unable to make that responsive without giving it a combination of Canard and Medium range aspect ratios..
Still the design has hope if not for the utter bungling that has left it nothing more than a technology demonstrator which its original client doesn’t want and its makers sick of it.

 

[randomradio]

Look at that. Someone's expecting LCA to have Rafale/Typhoon performance when IAF is only expecting it to have F-16/M-2000 level performance.

 

[Dungeness]

Nothing wrong as such with the design which was supposed to mimic the m2k but poor project management has left it closer to a Mirage-III.

Sadly, Indian fanboys will do whatever loghorrea to twist physics and mathematics to prove that the Delta which even Dassault and Four much much more experienced European Aircraft design bureaus with the Eurofighter were unable to make that responsive without giving it a combination of Canard and Medium range aspect ratios..
Still the design has hope if not for the utter bungling that has left it nothing more than a technology demonstrator which its original client doesn’t want and its makers sick of it.

Proud Indian keyboard warriors would rather doubt their military's integrity than believe IAF has legitimate reasons not wanting LCA. Interesting indeed.

 

[ADIL SHERDIL]

There must be something that's why Indians are still trying hard on Tejas otherwise it's been more than 30 years since its conception.
On paper realistically which plane is better Tejas mk3(assumption ) or thunder 2.
Expert opinion required with expert points thanks

 

[KapitaanAli]

There must be something that's why Indians are still trying hard on Tejas otherwise it's been more than 30 years since its conception.
On paper realistically which plane is better Tejas mk3(assumption ) or thunder 2.
Expert opinion required with expert points thanks

Mk1A capability similar to Block3.
Not considering materials used.

 

[CrusherChamp]

And each squadron has a squadron leader.. who drives the truck that carries Tejas..

Hahhahaha i cant stop man.........hahahha

No... the above plane is not assembled.. I am talking about this..

You see... full loaded.. ready to drop the water tanks to perform hit and run maneuver

Stop it yr. Bs kar da bhai. Hahhahah ....... hhaHHh oooo.man

 

[Mav3rick]

I personally think that IAF deliberately wants LCA to fail and so spreads rumors about performance issues with LCA. It could either be because LCA does actually have severe handicaps and cannot be expected to fight against PAF/PLAAF or that there are kickbacks involved with purchase of foreign Jets......the later is probably a more logical conclusion.

If IAF had the will, it would have ensured development of an extremely capable fighter Jet considering the financial power at their disposal. They can still pour a few USD Billion into LCA and see it outperform Gripen.

 

[KapitaanAli]

I personally think that IAF deliberately wants LCA to fail and so spreads rumors about performance issues with LCA. It could either be because LCA does actually have severe handicaps and cannot be expected to fight against PAF/PLAAF or that there are kickbacks involved with purchase of foreign Jets......the later is probably a more logical conclusion.

If IAF had the will, it would have ensured development of an extremely capable fighter Jet considering the financial power at their disposal. They can still pour a few USD Billion into LCA and see it outperform Gripen.

The truth lies somewhere in between.
Air Force has never missed their payment.
It's not in their power to define project costs.
But they'd certainly like foreign maal or exotic crafts made in India, which isn't possible now. This is why the only complaint you've heard from IAF recently is that LCA alone isn't enough.

They'll take as many LCA there's available to fill the numbers. If you observe these reports carefully, you'll see that IAF has never badmouthed the recent iterations. It's always some old quote or some anonymous source or a comparison to F16, which even IAF detest.

I personally think that IAF deliberately wants LCA to fail and so spreads rumors about performance issues with LCA. It could either be because LCA does actually have severe handicaps and cannot be expected to fight against PAF/PLAAF or that there are kickbacks involved with purchase of foreign Jets......the later is probably a more logical conclusion.

If IAF had the will, it would have ensured development of an extremely capable fighter Jet considering the financial power at their disposal. They can still pour a few USD Billion into LCA and see it outperform Gripen.

The truth lies somewhere in between.
Air Force has never missed their payment.
It's not in their power to define project costs.
But they'd certainly like foreign maal or exotic crafts made in India, which isn't possible now. This is why the only complaint you've heard from IAF recently is that LCA alone isn't enough.

They'll take as many LCA there's available to fill the numbers. If you observe these reports carefully, you'll see that IAF has never badmouthed the recent iterations. It's always some old quote or some anonymous source or a comparison to F16, which even IAF detest.

 

[CrusherChamp]

Mk1A capability similar to Block3.
Not considering materials used.

Only because of composit material u think mk1 is equal to jf 3 wowww. Now thats what i call a sensible comparrison. Keep dreaming.