Talks with BJP-led India not possible, says PM Imran

[HAIDER]

Talks with BJP-led India not possible, says PM Imran
Baqir Sajjad SyedPublished December 10, 2021 - Updated about 2 hours ago
Facebook Count
Twitter Share

8

Prime Minister Imran Khan addresses the inaugural plenary of the ‘Islamabad Conclave-2021’ on Thursday. — PID
ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Imran Khan on Thursday said that Kashmir dispute could only be resolved through dialogue, but meaningful engagement with the current government in India was not possible because of its religious nationalism.
Speaking at the Institute of Strategic Studies Islamabad’s (ISSI) ‘Islamabad Conclave-2021’, PM Khan recalled that South Asia had been held back by political differences and conflicts and listed the Kashmir dispute as the “biggest problem” holding the region back.
He said progress in relations between Pakistan and India had been halted because his government had to deal with RSS’s extremist ideology currently dominating Delhi. “Meaningful negotiations with India are impossible as long as the government there is inspired by this ideology,” he said, hoping that one day India could have a rational government with which resolution of disputes could be sought through logical and sane discussions.
The prime minister expected that once the two arch rivals resolved the core dispute of Kashmir they could then go ahead to jointly fight emerging threats like climate change. He regretted that all of his government’s peace overtures to India had so far been seen in Delhi as its sign of weakness.

Fears US-China confrontation moving ‘towards new Cold War’

PM Khan said he firmly believed that those seeking to resolve disputes through war were mistaken. “They are either unaware of history or they are too proud of their weapons,” he said, adding that they certainly had no consideration for humanity. This, he warned, led to grave miscalculations.
He underscored the need for resolving disputes till the last moment through dialogue.
The prime minister also touched upon the aggravating humanitarian situation in Afghanistan and the growing US-China rivalry. He feared that the US-China confrontation was moving “towards a new Cold War” and foresaw formation of blocs. “Pakistan should try its best to stop the formation of these blocs because we should not become a part of any bloc,” he maintained.
Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi also highlighted this concern in his remarks. “There is accelerated competition between major powers, and a drift towards confrontation. This can lead to new rivalries and push the world again into ‘bloc’ politics. A new Cold War seems to be taking shape,” he observed.
He said Pakistan’s primary interest was in seeking a peaceful and stable international order that takes everyone on board. “Pakistan will remain committed to peaceful coexistence, cooperative multilateralism and consensus-driven outcomes,” he added.
ISSI Director General Ambassador Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhry, in his introductory remarks, outlined the objectives of ‘Islamabad Conclave’, especially saying it is for narrative building, global engagement and bridging gaps.
Published in Dawn, December 10th, 2021

 

[Vapnope]

Finally they woke up from their slumber.

 

[Chhatrapati]

Haha I guess we should also wait till Pakistan becomes a secular republic ruled by secular parties before having talks. So that we can have some semblance in parties that negotiate.

 

[Maula Jatt]

No talk, be ready for war in case of any misadventure, guard against proxies
Expect this to be that way for 2-3 decades

No need to think of India beyond this

 

[Pappa Alpha]

India is so secular that it is run by radical hindus who consider cow urine as national drink and butcher muslims for selling beef.

Ignore this 2 cent chaprasi troll

 

[Goritoes]

Haha I guess we should also wait till Pakistan becomes a secular republic ruled by secular parties before having talks. So that we can have some semblance in parties that negotiate.

First make India secular state.

 

[Riz]

Talk with a hindutva terrorist lead country not possible: imran khan

 

[not_two]

Good .. Politeness is not expected of him.
Indo Pak relationship is doomed from the start ..BJP or any other party can't do anything about it ..Rather than maintaining uneasy relations it is better to close all the doors and look another direction.. Source of the problem is deeper than govts can handle ..Time may heal the wound or magnify it ..There is no magical formula..

 

[Black Tornado]

India is so secular that it is run by radical hindus who consider cow urine as national drink and butcher muslims for selling beef.

Your fellow Indian muslims aren’t any good, they butcher people for false “blasphemy” and selling non-halal meat.

Good .. Politeness is not expected of him.
Indo Pak relationship is doomed from the start ..BJP or any other party can't do anything about it ..Rather than maintaining uneasy relations it is better to close all the doors and look another direction.. Source of the problem is deeper than govts can handle ..Time may heal the wound or magnify it ..There is no magical formula..

Better is to grow economically as much as fast as possible, It is the best way to deal with the adversaries.

 

[ARMalik]

Well I fully support IK for not talking to these Indian Rascals and terrorists who are killing Kashmirs, Pakistanis and Afghans.

 

[Black Tornado]

First make India secular state.

India is already secular by defininition, what do you call secularism?

Secularism is a belief system that rejects religion, or the belief that religion should not be part of the affairs of the state or part of public education. The principles of separation of church and state and of keeping religion out of the public school system are an example of secularism.

Any religious scriptures are not part of any school in India, private institutions are allowed to.
Anyone can be the PM, CM and anything else constitutionally, no one barres anyone.

Are we perfect? No, absolutely not. But we’re trying to make ourselves perfect.

Well I fully support IK for not talking to these Indian Rascals and terrorists who are killing Kashmirs, Pakistanis and Afghans.

Bruh as if India is desperately waiting to talk with Pakistan.

 

[Chhatrapati]

First make India secular state.

No..

 

[jamahir]

India is already secular by defininition, what do you call secularism?

Secularism is a belief system that rejects religion, or the belief that religion should not be part of the affairs of the state or part of public education. The principles of separation of church and state and of keeping religion out of the public school system are an example of secularism.

Any religious scriptures are not part of any school in India, private institutions are allowed to.
Anyone can be the PM, CM and anything else constitutionally, no one barres anyone.

Are we perfect? No, absolutely not. But we’re trying to make ourselves perfect.

Sure, India is a secular and Socialist country by declaration in the preamble to the Indian Constitution but is it secular and Socialist in reality ? In fact wasn't it the BJP government's elements who some years ago wanted to remove "Secular" and "Socialist" from the preamble because they said they don't reflect "Indian" ethos and are foreign ideas ? Some elements of the ruling government want to in fact remove the current Constitution itself and replace it with the Hindu religious guide book the Manusmriti. Let us remember that it was this book that was burnt by the Dalit leader Ambedkar in 1927 because it is this foul book that defines the caste system and other such anti-human things.

How secular India is when the prime minister is wasting 400 crores on development works in a Himalayan Hindu temple when that economic resource could have been employed in building free hospitals and homes ? What kind of god will be pleased for a temple dedicated to him when humans are suffering unnecessarily and artificially ?

 

[Chhatrapati]

Indian Constitution but is it secular and Socialist in reality ?

A mistake to call it socialist and I fully agree to take that word away from preamble. As for being secular, does the state ever professed and promoted any religion? Does the state control how you practice your faith? Has Indian government ever decided when your religious holidays comes? If not, India is secular.

 

[Black Tornado]

Sure, India is a secular and Socialist country by declaration in the preamble to the Indian Constitution but is it secular and Socialist in reality ? In fact wasn't it the BJP government's elements who some years ago wanted to remove "Secular" and "Socialist" from the preamble because they said they don't reflect "Indian" ethos and are foreign ideas ? Some elements of the ruling government want to in fact remove the current Constitution itself and replace it with the Hindu religious guide book the Manusmriti. Let us remember that it was this book that was burnt by the Dalit leader Ambedkar in 1927 because it is this foul book that defines the caste system and other such anti-human things.

How secular India is when the prime minister is wasting 400 crores on development works in a Himalayan Hindu temple when that economic resource could have been employed in building free hospitals and homes ? What kind of god will be pleased for a temple dedicated to him when humans are suffering unnecessarily and artificially ?

Stop talking to me with your idiotic musings.