I usually open my mouth when I know something. Do you seriously think I didn't do research into this before arguing? Seriously now this is getting about your ego rather than the history that we're talking about. Tamils are not alien to me. Neither are mainstream Hindu researchers from your state and international ones that have spent more time and energy learning and unraveling the mysteries of ancient India than either you or me.
Trust me, it isn't as it seems. Even your argument of "aryan and dravidian" is flawed one as it was proven that entire subcontinent has only one genetic code which is uniquely placed such that it adopts to the place it resides in. Meaning that Tibetans, me, you and the other Indians of west and north are genetically the same "race".
Curb your ego for once and consider coming back to the topic. As I said, I've done considerable homework before arguing with you.
It is not essential to be born into one sub-culture to know more about it than others. It is about thirst of wanting to know in-depth and is not limited to just being born in that. For example, I know many non-Sikkimese and non-Buddhists who'd put any NE or Tibetan commoner to shame in indepth knowledge.
---------- Post added at 10:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:46 PM ----------
Nonsense.
Please don't accuse other's of regionalism. ALL Indians here have stood staunchly by Tamil people no different than as fellow Indians. And the truckloads of threads by Lankans here being countered is a fine example of that. You're just getting your ego bruised and hence blaming everyone here of anti-regional hate.
Don't make this victimization just because the reality isn't entirely as you've been told.
