Taiwan developing 'carrier killer'

[Kompromat]

Guys:

This is an Anti Ship Missile & not a carrier Killer !

even if they Name it , this missile wont look like a Carrier Killer as it has to be a Ballistic Missile or of its size to take out that gaint carrier.

Its a misinterparated hoax.

 

[scuthan]

What is the range of Hsiung Feng III Supersonic Anti-ship Missile?
India should offer Bhramos AShCM to Taiwan to arm this carrier killer, that would be a deadly combination.

You have to beg russies to sell "Bhramos" to you first in order to fill your wet dream. As a matter of fact, it will be a nice idea for you to beg taiwanese for Hsiung Feng III.

Today only America has the gut to sell weaponry to taiwan. it might be disappointing for you to know that Indian Govt fully acknowledge one china policy and Taiwanese members on PDF despise bhangees nothing less than chicoms do

 

[jha]

who says sale it to them...use back channels....

 

[below_freezing]

i think that taiwan would reject indian made weapons. see, unlike india they already made their own version of the LCA and already admitted it was far inferior to the J-10 and F-16. hell, it's inferior to the F-4.

 

[scuthan]

i think that taiwan would reject indian made weapons. see, unlike india they already made their own version of the LCA and already admitted it was far inferior to the J-10 and F-16. hell, it's inferior to the F-4.

the problem is what do they have to sell? Taiwannese Hsiung Feng III is an option for india actually. But taiwan won't sell it.

 

[jha]

how about a couple of ARIHANTs fitted with SAGARIKA to them for LEASE..

 

[topjumper]

how about a couple of ARIHANTs fitted with SAGARIKA to them for LEASE..

lol... what I see here is some Indian members trying hard to argue in one way or another that India is some kind of threat to China.

 

[ARCHON]

I see it now ... my oh my they are a tiny little thing ... causing all the comotion ....

40-60 miles of land and challenging BIG PANDA ....what are they smoking ...

I am suprised how small Tiwan is , they should just join China good from them lot of prosperity

Support fom main land china

Why are tiwan trying to fight china ... I need to get more information why Tiwan is trying to make big mistake they should just join with China its best for its people

Tiwan is so small it can be good tourist city for whole China , and may be important city for China if they join China I don't know also better economy

Hmm I mean if Hong Kong can join china they should too I mean really ... its the logical thing to do

Dont be amazed if i say that Taiwan is actually bigger than Isreal, Belgium, etc etc.

Its actually bigger than 96 countries in the world.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_outlying_territories_by_total_area

 

[applesauce]

anti-carrier weapon... lol
in the event of war the mainland wouldnt even their need carrier out of the port, meh the consensus right now is that they would fall in less than a month without US support anyways, i advocate taiwan get those older model f-16's from the usa(i still believe that most of their airforce will be useless in a war after the 1000 missile strike into the bases), it'll force some urgency into china's plane/engine development programs

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

anti-carrier weapon... lol
in the event of war the mainland would even need carrier out of the port, meh the consensus right now if they would fall in less than a month without US support anyways, but still i advocate taiwan get those older model f-16's from the usa(i still believe that most of their airforce will be useless in a war after the 1000 missile strike into the bases), it'll force some urgency into china's plane/engine development programs

Probbly 200 soliders would be enough to go and take keys form mayor in Tiwan and give it to China , and free airplanes

 

[mDumb]

Why would you ruffle your feathers over a BS thread?

As far the US intelligence concerns there is only one country that is developing ballistic missile that can destroy US aircraft carrier thousands of miles away.

<Last week, Adm. Robert Willard, the head of U.S. Pacific Command (PACOM), made an alarming but little-noticed disclosure. China, he told legislators, was “developing and testing a conventional anti-ship ballistic missile based on the DF-21/CSS-5 [medium-range ballistic missile] designed specifically to target aircraft carriers.”

What, exactly, does this mean? Evidence suggests that China has been developing an anti-ship ballistic missile, or ASBM, since the 1990s. But this is the first official confirmation that it has advanced (.pdf) to the stage of actual testing.

If they can be deployed successfully, Chinese anti-ship ballistic missiles would be the first capable of targeting a moving aircraft-carrier (.pdf) strike group from long-range, land-based mobile launchers.>

 

[mshahid1988]

RESPECTED SIRS,

I HAVE GOT MY B.COM DEGREE RECENTLY (54%marks overall adn in Accounts subjects 64% )AND NOW I HAVE A DREEM TO JION PAKISTAN AIR FORCE IN ANY FEILD WICH SUIT ME BECOUSE I JUST WANT TO JION PAKISTAN AIR FORCE



KINDLY TOLD ME ALL THE CAREER LEVEL THAT SUIT MY EDUCATION LEVEL

M.SHAHID
[email protected]
[email protected]
0092-333-8223985

 

[ao333]

anti-carrier weapon... lol
in the event of war the mainland wouldnt even their need carrier out of the port, meh the consensus right now is that they would fall in less than a month without US support anyways, i advocate taiwan get those older model f-16's from the usa(i still believe that most of their airforce will be useless in a war after the 1000 missile strike into the bases), it'll force some urgency into china's plane/engine development programs

What have you been smoking? Mainland China can take out Taiwan in 3 days. The issue here is that it only takes 2 days for US carrier groups to arrive in the Taiwan Strait. That's why the commies are stationing more SAM and developing better AAM-capable fighters to take out Taiwan's F-16C/D and Mirage-2000s, so as to capture Taiwan as soon as possible.

Though, the probability of taking out any armed region in 2 days is minor. The Chinese may be able to pull it off if they send all 200 of their J-10s, but that'd just open them up to foreign incursions.

 

[below_freezing]

that is why the best choice is to make the US hesitate and hopefully, not make the strategic mistake of sending a carrier battle fleet to its death. the ball is in the US court. it can either stay out, and maybe negotiate for the lives of the corrupt politicians, or it can play it out, and we'll make a new reef in the east sea.

 

[applesauce]

What have you been smoking? Mainland China can take out Taiwan in 3 days. The issue here is that it only takes 2 days for US carrier groups to arrive in the Taiwan Strait. That's why the commies are stationing more SAM and developing better AAM-capable fighters to take out Taiwan's F-16C/D and Mirage-2000s, so as to capture Taiwan as soon as possible.

Though, the probability of taking out any armed region in 2 days is minor. The Chinese may be able to pull it off if they send all 200 of their J-10s, but that'd just open them up to foreign incursions.

3 days... i dont think so, Mainers have to land and takeout defenders hiding in the rubble(this part may take a little while) and establish defensible positions in case the US drops by, also 2 carriers doesn't mean so much(itll take longer just to sail there depending on the position of the ships), the us has to land and attack(assemble a landing force), not just air strikes and those will face the s-300/hq-9s/plaaf(other than raptors they will have to expect heavy losses) that'll be in the area anyways. and ROC's air-force will be useless very shortly in to the conflict due to missile strikes on all their airbases, air superiority can be taken by the plaaf over ROC airforce but itll cost as they do have patriot missiles and the like. alos the question of whether the US will even interveen is unanswered is it worth it to go to war against PRC(potential ww3 where everyone dies) for ROC?

so in short it'll take longer than 3 days to secure victory and itll also take longer than 3 days for the US to respond with a proper force(or at all).