What's new

Syrian Civil War (Graphic Photos/Vid Not Allowed)

. .
Russian army in Syria

EFc_lsHU8AEtlCP.jpg



@pakistanipower @500 @925boy @Yaseen1 @vostok @Battle of Waterloo @mike2000 is back @Falcon29 @rambro @Nein

Su-34 and Su-35 attack jets at Jableh airbase


@pakistanipower @500 @925boy @Yaseen1 @vostok @Battle of Waterloo @mike2000 is back @Falcon29 @rambro @Nein @raptor22
 
. .
.
Too bad the result has been the total destruction of the country, due to one person's greed.
Isnt this an oversimplistic way of looking at the Syrian civil war? WHo TF was Assad fighting all this time? Actual Independent Syrian citizens? NO. Assad wasnt fighting his people for the most part. He was fighting foreign trained professional proxy-mercenary terrorist groups. thats the truth. If these groups werent so prevelant and active in fighting the SAA i dont see why Assad would wanna destroy his country. Makes no sense. why didnt he do it b4 now? during the war NATO ran 2 surveys that showed he still had at least 50% support from syrians so sorry, its western BS and propaganda to just say Assad destroyed Syria. ALways takes 2 to tango in war buddy.
 
. .
Isnt this an oversimplistic way of looking at the Syrian civil war? WHo TF was Assad fighting all this time? Actual Independent Syrian citizens? NO. Assad wasnt fighting his people for the most part. He was fighting foreign trained professional proxy-mercenary terrorist groups. thats the truth. If these groups werent so prevelant and active in fighting the SAA i dont see why Assad would wanna destroy his country. Makes no sense. why didnt he do it b4 now? during the war NATO ran 2 surveys that showed he still had at least 50% support from syrians so sorry, its western BS and propaganda to just say Assad destroyed Syria. ALways takes 2 to tango in war buddy.
The truth is the opposite. The bulk of Assad forces are foreign mercenaries:

clt0hczweaax4uc-jpg.326293


Add to this Russian air force, Russian special force, Russian mercenary groups.

Add to this ISIS which greatly helped Assad.

On rebel side there was only one tiny foreign group called Muhajerin wa Answar.
 
.
Syria is basically a Russian client state. Well, not like Assad has a choice. He owes his power to them. Else he will be long gone like Mubarak, Ben Ali, Muhammed Saleh , etc before him. Too bad the result has been the total destruction of the country, due to one person's greed.
Totally disagree. I know you support Iran and Syria generally. I understand almost every member here who is from the middle East /Muslim world have some sort of bias towards either Iran side or Saudi side.
However saying Assad did nothing wrong and is not the cause of the country's current turmoil is laughable. Who is the leader of the country? Whose family have been controlling the country with an iron fist for over half a century? A leader is responsible for anything that happens in his country. If he thinks he's not competent enough or capable anymore he should resign and let another person take over like it's done in most civilised countries. Instead of hanging on power at all costs even the cost of his country's people . Protests started peaceful but he tried to crack down on them with his military and security forces like most other Arab tyrants did during the Arab Spring. The only difference is that he finally got Russia's and Iranian help along with its many Shi'a militias else he will belong gone like the other Arab dictators who were deposed before him. A country is always bigger than one person. Only naive people will think a leader is irreplaceable or that a country should depend on one person's rule. He is fully responsible for the current situation of his country. And he will be remembered in history as such. His familly won't rule Syria forever , at one point they will have to leave as well. Too bad a civil war that ravaged the country had to be fought for that . Denying he's responsible is wrong.
 
Last edited:
.
Add to this ISIS which greatly helped Assad.
We still remember who were the allies of Isis and we still remember episodes when Isis for months failed to capture government positions and then US and co. Accidentally bombed those positions by mistake and then just in one to two hours ISIS attacked those positions and capture them.
 
. . .
We still remember who were the allies of Isis and we still remember episodes when Isis for months failed to capture government positions and then US and co. Accidentally bombed those positions by mistake and then just in one to two hours ISIS attacked those positions and capture them.
BS stories. There was only 1 incident when Assadists claimed that US bombed them killing 100 or something. And it was total BS.
 
.
BS stories. There was only 1 incident when Assadists claimed that US bombed them killing 100 or something. And it was total BS.
Yeah sure . specially the part that us and co claimed the attack was by mistake. You knew you some times mistakenly bomb some people for 37 times .
You knew Israel also do the same for example sometimes they bomb a ship for 40 min and claim they could not identify to whom it belonged.
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom