What's new

Surgical or no Surgical strike? a difficult way to agreed upon.

This is such a funny war, Indian claims to have done Surgical strike turned into pre-emptive strike Over the death of 21 soldiers in Uri causing the death of 14 soldier at LOC and one captive, claims to have destroyed 5 terrorists launch pads turned into 6 and later into 7, killing 10 terrorists at each launch pad, having no resistance from "Terrorists", having no proof of any killings. There should be a video game on this war soon

"UN chief's spokesperson Stephane Dujarric had earlier said that the UN Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP) "has not directly observed any firing across the LoC related to the latest incidents","

So if UNMOGIP did not directly observe and firing across LOC (from their offices in Muzaffarabad) does that mean there was not firing on the LOC, then how did 2 Pakistani soldiers die?

Same logic applies for this cross border operation on Pakistani side of LOC.

It means they did not observe it, there are not present at every inch of 100s of KM of LOC.
the word observe means seeing with their own eyes!
atlhough we did observe it in a video :)
 
hehehe these genetical liars are caught lying red handed :lol:
 
So, India publicly said that it has conducted a surgical strike across the LOC and targeted terrorist launch pads (India made it clear that the strikes were against terrorist and not against PA). Also India stated that India didn’t violate anything as the strikes were in Pakistan held Kashmir which India claims and not across the international border. India briefed the P5 and envoys of 22 countries about the strikes. There has been zero escalation and zero international repercussions or condemnation until now.

Now I was just wondering that with a $100 billion modernization program in the coming decade the conventional disparity between the Indian and Pakistani armed forces will only grow, especially in the case of the two air forces. With procurement of predator drones, S400 and Rafael etc some believe that the disparity would be like that of the two Navies now. So, what if in future India says it will strike the terrorist training camps or launch pads from air across LOC periodically and is more than happy to fight and give a bloody nose to PA due to it’s massive conventional superiority.

What are the options for Pakistan/ISI then?

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...ikes-Syed-Akbaruddin/articleshow/54622876.cms
You don't call a bluff with another bluff, and Pakistan's first strike doctrine is not a bluff. Its call preemptive defense.
 
Crying at UN that nobody listens whether about Kashmir or Surgical..
Best option for Pakistan is to do surgical strike in return..
No they have mastered denial,and will deny any strikes
 
You don't call a bluff with another bluff, and Pakistan's first strike doctrine is not a bluff. Its call preemptive defense.

So if India uses drones to target a few terrorist launch pads in future Pakistan will nuke India in response?
 
Mod is baffled after discovering that the world is not buying this $hit. "No Evidence Surgical Strike" has earned him and his forces a great deal of humiliation in Pakistan and sufficient disrespect internationally.

What has he got nationally? Indians who has promised that they will not question its legitimacy and will not ask for any evidence are happy today.
 
No they have mastered denial,and will deny any strikes
HAHAH These people!
I saw some Pakistanis were sharing video of a Maoist encounter which is around 5 years old & had claimed it to be surgical strike video.Later I replied him with live leak link & he deleted own comment..Even their PDF Facebook page is sharing such videos..
 
Nobody cares if you believe it or not. fact is India has already informed all major countries including US about surgical strikes.. which pakistan still denies but goes to UN crying..
 
Back
Top Bottom