What's new

Su-35 multi-role fighter

good in look and gr8 in performance...i wish india should buy this....

We already have the best 30 Varient for our Needs.
MKI is a Hybrid of Su 30, Su 37 and Su 35.
With Israeli Jammers and Western Avionics and Indian Mission Computers.
 
. . .
We already have the best 30 Varient for our Needs.
MKI is a Hybrid of Su 30, Su 37 and Su 35.
With Israeli Jammers and Western Avionics and Indian Mission Computers.

my mind got corrupted by this Russian beauty so i commented like that..
 
.
my mind got corrupted by this Russian beauty so i commented like that..

Here is the Indian Beauty ::

0f99f7c3b75e2f2615a267188effda16.jpg


9dedb1f984b7f80902a7025048d6445d.jpg



efba3c46571221dfd0dddf5951c110f4.jpg


77000ca33ef9908effb00e3d0fa77404.jpg



cf1a394213d1a38f550472e815e1d2f3.jpg


70e96979424c64c7a32c711ad89e943f.jpg


For More : http://www.defence.pk/forums/military-photos-multimedia/23557-fall-love-sukhoi-mki.html
 
. .
Resembles with F35 Cockpit.
Notice the similar two 15 Inch Displays.

76f0f5c3c12f04336ad2a1ed980ac888.jpg
 
.
I see in Flanker, stick is in the middle while in F35, its on side. Is it like that for Russian and US fighters? or is it just for F35? Just wondering......
 
.


Su-35S demonstrator with exposed Irbis-E phased array. The now well established trend in Russian sensors for BVR combat is increasing range performance and countermeasures resistance. The 20 kiloWatt peak power class Irbis E ESA radar is the most powerful in its class.

 
.
Tikhomirov NIIP N035 Irbis E

new Irbis-E (Snow Leopard) hybrid phased array, in development since 2004 and planned for the Su-35BM block upgrade, and as a block upgrade or new build radar for other Flanker variants, such as the Su-35-1. It will enter production before the end of this decade.

The Irbis-E is a direct evolution of the BARS design, but significantly more powerful. While the hybrid phased array antenna is retained, the noise figure is slightly worse at 3.5 dB, but the receiver has four rather than three discrete channels. The biggest change is in the EGSP-27 transmitter, where the single 7 kiloWatt peak power rated Chelnok TWT is replaced with a pair of 10 kiloWatt peak power rated Chelnok tubes, ganged to provide a total peak power rating of 20 kiloWatts. The radar is cited at an average power rating of 5 kiloWatts, with 2 kiloWatts CW rating for illumination. NIIP claim twice the bandwidth and improved frequency agility over the BARS, and better ECCM capability. The Irbis-E has new Solo-35.01 digital signal processor hardware and Solo-35.02 data processor, but retains receiver hardware, the master oscillator and exciter of the BARS. A prototype has been in flight test since late 2005.

The performance increase in the Irbis-E is commensurate with the increased transmitter rating, and NIIP claim a detection range for a closing 3 square metre coaltitude target of 190 - 215 NMI (350-400 km), and the ability to detect a closing 0.01 square metre target at ~50 NMI (90 km). In Track While Scan (TWS) mode the radar can handle 30 targets simultaneously, and provide guidance for two simultaneous shots using a semi-active missile like the R-27 series, or eight simultaneous shots using an active missile like the RVV-AE/R-77 or ramjet RVV-AE-PD/R-77M. The Irbis-E was clearly designed to support the ramjet RVV-AE-PD/R-77M missile in BVR combat against reduced signature Western fighters like the Block II Super Hornet or Eurofighter Typhoon. Curiously, NIIP do not claim superiority over the F-22A's APG-77 AESA, yet their cited performance figures exceed the public (and no doubt heavily sanitised) range figures for the APG-77.

The existing N011M series lacks a Low Probability of Intercept capability, in part due to antenna bandwidth limits and in part due to processor limitations. This is likely to change over the coming decade, with the Irbis-E, as customers demand an ability to defeat or degrade Western ESM equipment and the technology to do this becomes more accessible.
 
. .
I see in Flanker, stick is in the middle while in F35, its on side. Is it like that for Russian and US fighters? or is it just for F35? Just wondering......

I think stick on the side is better as it does not block view of the monitors.
On the other hand stick in centre is probably better for left handers (like me :))

regards,
 
Last edited:
.
I see in Flanker, stick is in the middle while in F35, its on side. Is it like that for Russian and US fighters? or is it just for F35? Just wondering......

f-16 and f-22 have it on right side too...
 
. . .

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom