What's new

Stupid and funny from all over the world - II

Status
Not open for further replies.
Justice Katju Revealed

483824_10152647420975231_1722583_n.jpg


Sir Ravidra Jadeja

527849_547930695252220_1905590378_n.jpg
 
[video=facebook;118808878310060]http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=


It's not inertia. Strictly speaking it's Newton's first law:If there is no net force on an object, then its velocity is constant. The object is either at rest (if its velocity is equal to zero), or it moves with constant speed in a single direction unless there is any external force acting on it.

In simple an object with velocity x will continue moving with speed x unless there is any external force acting on it. And that's what's happening here. He is reversing so fast so the strips on the lorry are moving with it but when he suddenly stops, the strips still have the velocity so it stops later.

By general definition of 'inertia = amount of resistance to change in velocity' you are right but inertia is attributed to First law of Newton

Abe yaar yaha toh Newton koh mat Lao
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom