21 Dec 2012
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 894
- Reaction score
- -2
So do you have any none PS'ed photograph?
It would be more like that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So do you have any none PS'ed photograph?
It would be more like that.
Only concrete example to date is the J-15 which is based on the T-10K (SU-33 prototype) China received from Ukraine. There hasn't been that much news about this. I wouldn't be surprised if there are other such carrier borne fighter programs being considered. Sometime in the 2020s, the Americans will probably have far more capable stealth UCAVs working as wingmen of their manned fighters. I speculate the J-15 will eventually evolve into a carrier borne PAK FA like stealth fighter and/or another carrier borne fighter will be developed from the ground up as a new stealth fighter.Is there any Chinese fighter for their next carrier program?
It's obviously a fake. No stealth fighter would retain a vertical tail and have external weapons. Nice PS job though.How about something like this?
stealty J-10C has external weapons?
it is called hiding your inferiority under mocking. excessive torture under CPC is taking your senses away.
in fact what could you achieve even in 1962 .... you failed to takeover even an unmanned border enclave.
ran back picking up your tail
you can keep trying your series of junks ... junk-10, junk-20, junk-30, junk-40.
nothing but self delusion.... sorry.
Considering the J-20 and J-16/21 (whatever it will be called) will be the frontline stealth fighters, what purpose would a stealth J-10C serve especially given that it would still not have internal weapons bays? Doesn't seem to make sense and sounds like vaporware to me. It's much more likely the J-10B will simply evolve to a lower RCS similar to the Eurofighter and Rafale.
its off the topic but the true meaning of LCA is
LCA= Lost Credibility (of) Aircraft and reason is 30 years and we still hear
JF-17= Jugaad but Flying fighterOff topic but by your logic true meaning of JF17 - JUGAAD Fuddu Fighter!:
Did not even leaned to walk and talking about killing best boys in business.
its off the topic but the true meaning of LCA is
LCA= Lost Credibility (of) Aircraft and reason is 30 years and we still hear
JF-17= Jugaad but Flying fighter
LCA=..............?
Still....C'mon..................?http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian-defence/164228-tejas-lsp-7-first-flight-any-time-now.html
Tejas LSP-7 in first flight any time now
u have to keep in mind we r NOT getting Block 2 this year china have committed to Batch 2 of JF this year batch 3 may be Blk 2 with aesa but remember AESA ll not only stay in batch 3 ACs it ll be replaced in 1st and second ons too. now with J10/FC20 yes we need an AESA no matter what but remember FC20 is not a done designe even yet some say it is based on j 10 b same say its a modified J10a but i think its non of them and a compleatly different jet may be in avionics or even in structural sesigne but yes PAF knows for fact that IAF ll have AESA in both SU30 and rafal very soon so FC20 which is an aircraft required to counter both of these beasts needs one so yes PAF wants an AESA in both JF an FC in a copul of years.So wait i don't get it. Are we in favour of AESA or not?
I think the plan would be to have AESA in JF-17 Blk 2 because it will be cheaper.
Since our order could go upto 150 for FC-20, 36 of the ones we ordered for the time being may not be AESA...