What's new

Stalin killed Netaji, Subramanian Swamy says

i don't know any one posted this link
Times Of India - NewsHub

“I don’t think there was any air-crash. Netaji went to Russia, because he did not want to be caught by the British and Americans who would have tried him as a war criminal. He wanted to try his luck with Stalin. The boss of USSR kept him for sometime trying to figure out what to do with him. In the meanwhile the British realized that Netaji had made his escape to Russia and put pressure on Stalin. This is the time when the Cold War had not begun or it had just begun but it was not too cold. So Anglo Russian relations were none too bad. The British realized that if Netaji was openly arrested and tried, all hell would break loose in India. So Stalin was persuaded and he packed Netaji off to Siberia and that’s where he died in the cold,”
 
Last edited:
Gandhi's national security doctrine and his (one of the) differences with Netaji;
Nehru tried to follow the Gandhian doctrine in the initial years till 1962 happened:


"India's defence lies in the cultivation of friendly relations with her neighbours and her ability to resist, through nonviolent non-co-operation, her exploitation by any nation. The first act of a National Government should be to disband this menace (Indian Army)...."

-- Mahatma Gandhi in 1932.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

“Gandhism will land free India in a ditch – if free India is sought to be rebuilt on Gandhian, non-violent principles. India will then be offering a standing invitation to all predatory powers.”

-- Netaji Subhas Bose in 1940.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

“We had believed that in a non-violent India, the last thing the Government would contemplate would be an increase in the military budget, but I am sorry to say that and I still think it would disturb the soul of the Father of the Nation, that in the recent years there has been an increase.”

-- JB Kripalani, who had sided with Gandhi in his 1939 clash with Bose, speaking in Parliament in 1958.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

“ऐ मेरे वतन के लोगों ज़रा आँख में भर लो पानी, जो शहीद हुए हैं उनकी ज़रा याद करो क़ुरबानी”

-- A famous Bollywood song exhorting the people of India not to forget the sacrifices made by the Indian soldiers in the 1962 war.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Picture: Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Defence Minister AK Antony and MoS Jitendra Kumar along with Services' chiefs and others paying tributes to Mahatma Gandhi on his death anniversary at Rajghat on 30 January 2013.

10915272_10152482024441557_7492435752984178992_n.jpg

I'm sure allying with Hitler showed the greatness of Netaji's judgement.
 
Is the Netaji mystery getting curiouser and curiouser?
January 23, 2015, 10:12 AM IST Kingshuk Nag in Masala Noodles | India |
20

It is January 23, 2015 today and the 118th birthday of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose. Although there is a new government, nay, a paradigm shift in Delhi, the files relating to the disappearance of Netaji remain classified in the Prime Minister’s office and the ministry of external affairs. Last month, the Modi government refused to declassify the files on the grounds that India’s relations with friendly neighboring countries would be ‘adversely affected’ if the contents of the files are made public. This is precisely the same grounds on which the previous Congress governments steadfastly refusing to open the files. At that time, the public perception was that the reluctance of the government was to shield Nehru who it was averred would be shown in a less than flattering light, if the contents of the files were to be shared with the public. But Narendra Modi has no kinship with Jawaharlal Nehru ideologically and is no blood relation of the latter so there is public consternation at the refusal.

A retired top intelligence official who served for three and a half decades in both the Intelligence Bureau (IB) and the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) says that it is his belief that Modi will not be ‘allowed’ to open up the files. But who can stop an ‘absolute’ PM that is Modi? He says the system – the one designed by the British rulers – is to hide information and this has continued even in Independent India. “Even if Modi wants to open the files, his officials will quote various rules and regulations and take recourse to various considerations to tell him why the information cannot be made public,” the retired official says. Incidentally files related to Netaji are in the custody of the West Bengal government – which presumably is more sympathetic to the cause of the patriot who disappeared – are yet to be declassified.

I asked the official whether he had seen the files relating to Netaji during his long tenure in IB. The retired official shook his head and said no. But his ready ‘no’ made this writer suspicious that he would have and I asked him what, in his opinion, could have happened to Netaji. Without blinking an eye lid he said: “I don’t think there was any air-crash. Netaji went to Russia, because he did not want to be caught by the British and Americans who would have tried him as a war criminal. He wanted to try his luck with Stalin. The boss of USSR kept him for sometime trying to figure out what to do with him. In the meanwhile the British realized that Netaji had made his escape to Russia and put pressure on Stalin. This is the time when the Cold War had not begun or it had just begun but it was not too cold. So Anglo Russian relations were none too bad. The British realized that if Netaji was openly arrested and tried, all hell would break loose in India. So Stalin was persuaded and he packed Netaji off to Siberia and that’s where he died in the cold,” the retired official said.

The retired official however cautioned that the entire story of Netaji won’t be found in Indian files. “In fact there will be very little here. All you may have are cross references to him and queries from the foreign governments about him,” he said. Information relating to Netaji’s ultimate fate will be deep inside archives in USSR or in the files of British intelligence.

I think that it is humbug that the public revelation of contents of Netaji files will spoil relations with friendly countries. I do not think that if it is revealed Netaji died due to the actions of Stalin will make me hate Boris Yeltsin and the Russians in general. After all the British tortured and hung so many Indian revolutionaries right from Khudiram Bose to Ram Prasad Bismil to Bhagat Singh. This does not mean that the Indians hate the British.

Modi represents a new paradigm in Indian politics and he would do well to determinedly put down the objections of babudom and throw open the Netaji files. This may actually pay political dividends for him in the elections to be held in West Bengal next year. The Communists who draw inspiration from Russia and China will be red faced after the revelations and the Congress will have nowhere to hide. As far as the ruling Trinamul Congress is concerned it too has been passive. Under siege due to the Sarada scam, the Trinumul Congress could have scored brownie points if it went hyper in unearthing the Netaji disappearance mystery by pro actively setting up an inquiry commission. The last inquiry commission – under the chairmanship of a retired Supreme Court judge MK Mukherjee had found that the plane crash in Taiwan in 1945 in which Netaji purported to have died never took place. But without the cooperation of the government, the commission could go no further.

Now it is time to go forward on the matter and if the powers that be show no interest it is for civil society activists to establish a Concerned Citizens’ Tibunal to investigate the disappearance of Netaji. Ultimately truth has to prevail.
 
When will Indians ever jump up and down? When will you ask the gov't to step up and ask what happened to one of best and loyal freedom fighters? Netaji sacraficed his life for what? So we can appease the same blood sucking faggots who wanted to break and destroy India?


At some point, we have got to grow a pair of balls and say enough is enough. Would any other country treat their freedom fighters so poorly? Only in India I guess. This guy will always remain my hero who did his utmost best to help India. Nobody told him to do so. He acted on noble intentions. He could have simply lived a wonderful life of wealth if he chose not to pursue freedom.



To this day, Indians have not developed an unified identity still. Looks like the British and other powers achieved what they wanted the most. The British were able to convince Stalin which irks me, which seems they were against India? Why? Why did we seem to pose such a threat? To whom?
 
Last edited:
Sudesh Chandra Bose was a hero. He fought for freedom from the British and tried to stop the legacy of slavery we had initiated. He must be respected regardless of being Pakistani or Indian.
 
Netaji did not get due honours, says Mamata Banerjee - The Economic Times

By PTI | 23 Jan, 2015, 11.23PM IST

DARJEELING: Amidst the demand for declassification of secret files relating to the disappearance of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee today rued that he did not got the honours he deserved from "powers that be".

"The final days of Netaji is still a mystery. What happened to him, no one knows. History is incomplete. Netaji has not got the honour he deserved from the powers that be," Banerjee said at a government programme to observe his
118th birth anniversary here.

Along with some activists, several of Netaji's family members have been demanding release of secret files from government records which they said can solve the mystery of his disappearance in 1945.

In a recent RTI reply, the PMO said there were 41 files related to Netaji, of which two had been declassified, but theremaining ones would not made so as the "disclosure would prejudicially affect relation with foreign countries".

"Netaji is one of the most inspirational persons in Indian history. I am ready to sacrifice my life for preserving the unity of this country," Banerjee said.

"I love my brothers and sisters of the Hills. I am happy to be in Darjeeling to celebrate the birthday of the great son of India," said the chief minister, who was here on January 23 last year too.

The Trinamool Congress chief also remembered the contribution of the Gorkhas in the formation of the Indian National Army (INA).

She announced Rs one lakh assistance each to 10 poor persons of Sherpa and Rs five crore to the Sherpa Cultural Board for the development of the community.

Senior Gorkha Janmukti Morcha (GJM) leaders like Roshan Giri, Ramesh Alley and Harka Bahadur Chhetri were present at the programme.


****************************************************************8


Opposition parties like TMC are already putting pressure on the Government to know the truth about Subhash Chandra Bose before the visit of President Obama.
 
Churchill and Stalin were just as ruthless as Hitler was. Netaji did what he did because he thought it would help India to achieve freedom.

In a way it did, INA trial and corresponding mutiny by British Indian Army have much larger impact on India's freedom than it has been credited with.

Stalin probably killed more than the Nazis did and Churchill orchestrated the Bengal famine which killed millions.

Anyway world is not black and white as some people think it is, there are shades of grey.
 
RIN mutiny gave a jolt to the British

The ratings mutiny in the Royal Indian Navy made the British realise it was time to leave India. Dhananjaya Bhat on the uprising that took place 60 years ago on February 18


rin.jpg

RIN Mutineer’s Memorial in Mumbai


WHICH phase of our freedom struggle won for us Independence? Mahatma Gandhi’s 1942 Quit India movement or The INA army launched by Netaji Bose to free India or the Royal Indian Navy Mutiny of 1946? According to the British Prime Minister Clement Attlee, during whose regime India became free, it was the INA and the RIN Mutiny of February 18-23 1946 that made the British realise that their time was up in India.

An extract from a letter written by P.V. Chuckraborty, former Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court, on March 30 1976, reads thus: "When I was acting as Governor of West Bengal in 1956, Lord Clement Attlee, who as the British Prime Minister in post war years was responsible for India’s freedom, visited India and stayed in Raj Bhavan Calcutta for two days`85 I put it straight to him like this: ‘The Quit India Movement of Gandhi practically died out long before 1947 and there was nothing in the Indian situation at that time, which made it necessary for the British to leave India in a hurry. Why then did they do so?’ In reply Attlee cited several reasons, the most important of which were the INA activities of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, which weakened the very foundation of the British Empire in India, and the RIN Mutiny which made the British realise that the Indian armed forces could no longer be trusted to prop up the British. When asked about the extent to which the British decision to quit India was influenced by Mahatma Gandhi’s 1942 movement, Attlee’s lips widened in smile of disdain and he uttered, slowly, ‘Minimal’."

Strangely enough, like the chapattis which went all around India during the 1857 First War of Independence asking the nation drive away the British, it was 20 loaves of bread that started this so-called RIN Mutiny. It was a reaction against the high-handed behaviour by British officers of the RIN. On January 16, 1946, a contingent of 67 ratings of various branches arrived at Castle Barracks, Mint Road, in Fort Mumbai. This contingent had arrived from the basic training establishment, HMIS Akbar, located at Thane a suburb of Mumbai at four in the evening. The officer on duty informed the galley (kitchen) staff of this arrival. Quite casually, the duty cook, without winking an eyelid, took out 20 loaves of bread from the large cupboard and added three litres of tap water to the mutton curry as well as the gram dal which was lying already cooked before as per the morning strength of the ratings. On that day, only 17 ratings ate the watery, tasteless meals, while the rest went ashore and ate. When reported to senior officers present, this grievances practically evoked no response and the discontentment continued to build up.

These complaints continued to agitate the ratings and a naval central strike committee was formed on February 18, 1946. It was led by naval rating M.S Khan. Soon, thousands of disgruntled ratings from Mumbai, Karachi, Cochin and Vishakhapatnam joined them. They communicated with each other through the wireless communication sets available in HMIS Talwar. Thus, the entire revolt was coordinated. The unrest spread to shore establishments from the initial flashpoint in Bombay to Karachi and Calcutta, involving 78 ships, 20 shore establishments and 20,000 sailors.

The next morning, the Tricolour was hoisted by the ratings on most of the ships and establishments. The third day came charged with fresh emotions. Sardar Patel’s statement of assurance did improve matters considerably. However, an unruly guncrew of a 25-pounder gun fitted in an old ship, fired a salvo, without orders from the strikers, towards the Castle barracks and blew off a large branch of an old banyan tree. By this time the British destroyers fully armed to go into action arrived and had positioned themselves off the Gateway of India in Mumbai.

The RIN Mutiny was treated as a crisis of the empire by an alarmed British cabinet and Attlee Clement, ordered the Royal Navy to put down the revolt. Admiral Godfrey, the Flag Officer commanding the RIN, went on air with his order "Submit or perish".

The next day, the RAF (Royal Air Force) threatened the defiant RIN ships by flying a squadron of bombers low over Bombay harbour even as Admiral Rattray, Flag Officer, Bombay, RIN, issued an ultimatum asking the ratings to raise black flags and surrender unconditionally.

Both Muhammad Ali Jinnah and Sardar Patel successfully persuaded the ratings to surrender. Patel wrote, "Discipline in the army cannot be tampered with. We will want [the] army even in free India". Mahatma Gandhi, criticised the strikers for mutinying without the call of a ‘prepared revolutionary party’ and without the ‘guidance and intervention’ of ‘political leaders of their choice’.

The issue remained unresolved till the morning of February 23, when the hopeless situation produced a vote of surrender. The black flags went up at six on the morning of February 23.

The negotiations moved fast, keeping in view the extreme sensitivity of the situation and most of the demands of the strikers regarding welfare measures were conceded in principle. Immediate steps were taken to improve the quality of food served in the ratings’ kitchen and their living conditions. But these were followed up by court martials and large-scale dismissals from the service. None of those dismissed were reinstated into either of the Indian or Pakistani navies after Independence.

But the brave sailors had demonstrated to the British that they would rise in defence of their motherland, thus leaving the foreign imperialists little option but to quit.

Today a memorial to the brave RIN ratings, completed by the Indian Navy in 2002, stands in the busy Colaba area in Central Bombay. — MF

The Sunday Tribune - Spectrum
 
Churchill and Stalin were just as ruthless as Hitler was. Netaji did what he did because he thought it would help India to achieve freedom.

In a way it did, INA trial and corresponding mutiny by British Indian Army have much larger impact on India's freedom than it has been credited with.

Stalin probably killed more than the Nazis did and Churchill orchestrated the Bengal famine which killed millions.

Anyway world is not black and white as some people think it is, there are shades of grey.
Stalin was probably a million times more ruthless than hitler.
 
Stalin was probably a million times more ruthless than hitler.

True, Stalin, Hitler, Churchill or imperialistic Japan, none were saints, they all committed war crimes and atrocities. Congress supported allied forces and Britain without being tagged as Stalin or Churchill 'sympathizers', but Netaji suddenly becomes Nazi 'sympathizer' for taking help from Germany & Japan to fight against British occupation of India. Here we will utter the British line on Bose completely ignoring the fact that his letters indicate that he was just using real-politic, he was against the practices of Nazi Germany and Japan and he despised Hitler as a madman. Unfortunately many here won't see any hypocrisy here.
 
i don't know any one posted this link
Times Of India - NewsHub

“I don’t think there was any air-crash. Netaji went to Russia, because he did not want to be caught by the British and Americans who would have tried him as a war criminal. He wanted to try his luck with Stalin. The boss of USSR kept him for sometime trying to figure out what to do with him. In the meanwhile the British realized that Netaji had made his escape to Russia and put pressure on Stalin. This is the time when the Cold War had not begun or it had just begun but it was not too cold. So Anglo Russian relations were none too bad. The British realized that if Netaji was openly arrested and tried, all hell would break loose in India. So Stalin was persuaded and he packed Netaji off to Siberia and that’s where he died in the cold,”

Soviet Union invaded manchuria on 9th August 1945 and the reports of subhash chandra bose plane crashed was on 18th August1945. Azad hind Fauj was still fighting for Independence during that period.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom