Sri Lanka snubs India, opens port to Chinese submarine again

[Sahasranama]

that is unlike china and vietnam or cuba and US,,SL and India maintain very good relationships. Actually recent times SL and India both during war and now under Modi has developed good diplomatic relationships.

Even at the lowest point of india-SL relations it has never been the same as cuba and us or china/vietnam..

This is the result of immature media of india....brainwashing of ppl

That is what the pakistani says. Indians are all brain washed and they are the good guys .... looks like SL is heading that way.

 

[Saradiel]

That is what the pakistani says. Indians are all brain washed and they are the good guys .... looks like SL is heading that way.

Depending on your ability of comprehension you can come into any silly conclusion

 

[Sahasranama]

Depending on your ability of comprehension you can come into any silly conclusion

... must be because of my brainwashing

 

[Penguin]

nuclear attack sub not carrying any nukes, obviously wut ?

Uhm, yes, as the designation SSN refers to propulsion rather than armament (which doesn't rule out nuclear armament, but does rule out ICBMs as we have the designation SSBN for that, and SSGN if it carries (nuclear or conventional armed) land attack cruise missiles)

 

[Saradiel]

Then its better if SL learns how International geo Politics get played and not make school boy comments like ask china why its sub docked in SL

Before asking others to learn intl geo politics learn that no country in this world cannot ignore any country, so asking SL to choose between india and china is childish. Learn that first

 

[Saradiel]

... must be because of my brainwashing

most probably otherwise you wouldnt wonder what was wrong with your media

 

[Penguin]

that is unlike china and vietnam or cuba and US,,SL and India maintain very good relationships. Actually recent times SL and India both during war and now under Modi has developed good diplomatic relationships.

Even at the lowest point of india-SL relations it has never been the same as cuba and us or china/vietnam..

This is the result of immature media of india....brainwashing of ppl

New Zealand and US have good relations, yet New Zealand refuses nuclear or undisclosed ships.
If relations are so good, how does one explain SL siding with a strategic opponent of India?

 

[gau8av]

Uhm, yes, as the designation SSN refers to propulsion rather than armament (which doesn't rule out nuclear armament, but does rule out ICBMs as we have the designation SSBN for that, and SSGN if it carries (nuclear or conventional armed) land attack cruise missiles)

thanks, I always get confused with the submarine designated terms

 

[Penguin]

thanks, I always get confused with the submarine designated terms

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SSN_(hull_classification_symbol)

• Ballistic missile submarine (SSB/SSBN)

• Cruise missile submarine (SSG/SSGN)

 

[Sahasranama]

Before asking others to learn intl geo politics learn that no country in this world cannot ignore any country, so asking SL to choose between india and china is childish. Learn that first

If you are going to play with fire and host war machines on your docks, you limit your choices and are either forced to choose or the Choice is made for you.

What a shame you refuse to grow up and see what should be obvious.

 

[Saradiel]

New Zealand and US have good relations, yet New Zealand refuses nuclear or undisclosed ships.
If relations are so good, how does one explain SL siding with a strategic opponent of India?

How is that SL siding with india's opponent?

India and china are not at war. Your countries do trade with each other and state leaders visit each others countries. I dont know on what basis you say china is your oponent. If india does engage with china what is wrong in SL engaging with china? what logic is that?
What you said may have a point had SL received a chinese nuke sub at a period when china and india were at war. As there is no any war between the two countries this is taking things too far.

SL has already stated it wont allow any activity that can harm India's security. So what else?

 

[Saradiel]

If you are going to play with fire and host war machines on your docks, you limit your choices and are either forced to choose or the Choice is made for you.

What a shame you refuse to grow up and see what should be obvious.

The one who is refusing to grow up is you, showcasing your insecurities here. What you do not realise is you cannot make a choice for us. what can India do? Bomb us? The point you do not realise is you cannot act like a street thug like you wish you can.
India cannot do anything just because SL allowed a chinese ship to dock here.

 

[Sahasranama]

How is that SL siding with india's opponent?

India and china are not at war. Your countries do trade with each other and state leaders visit each others countries. I dont know on what basis you say china is your oponent. If india does engage with china what is wrong in SL engaging with china? what logic is that?
What you said may have a point had SL received a chinese nuke sub at a period when china and india were at war. As there is no any war between the two countries this is taking things too far.

SL has already stated it wont allow any activity that can harm India's security. So what else?

Economic engagement is not the same as MILITARY engagement. Are you Stupid ?

Do you think US an Cuba were are war ? or even US and USSR was at war ?

 

[Sahasranama]

The one who is refusing to grow up is you, showcasing your insecurities here. What you do not realise is you cannot make a choice for us. what can India do? Bomb us? The point you do not realise is you cannot act like a street thug like you wish you can.
India cannot do anything just because SL allowed a chinese ship to dock here.

Name calling is childish. "insecure", "thug", "bomber" etc.... its just shows how immature you are.

It is not India who made a choice for SL, SL had made a choice in our eyes by allowing Chinese ship to dock in SL.

The only options are either SL realizes what it has done or India take necessary action to safeguard its interests and ensure that it can never happen again.

 

[Saradiel]

Economic engagement is not the same as MILITARY engagement. Are you Stupid ?

Do you think US an Cuba were are war ? or even US and USSR was at war ?

SL's stance has always been they will not let others harm india's security interets. Just because a ship docks it doesnt mean it harms india's security. If SL supports china same way at a time of war between india and china you will have a point. At the moment there is no such threat. That is why i say your comments are immature and nearly hysterical.
I dont think in a war situtaion SL would pick any side.
Before calling others stupid learn to remember the propaganda correctly no matter where you pick them up. Otherwise your copy pasting is useless.