grey boy 2
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2009
- Messages
- 6,484
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Vietnamese so funny!!stop lie here my dude. Spratly and Paracel was controlled and part of Vietnam sovereignty from long time in the past .
claim and occupation of china is illegal.
Full map òf China KMT printed in China 1936. No where ís Spratly and Paracel Islands.
Vietnamese so funny!!
Map of the South China Sea in 1937
View attachment 344894
The South China Sea Islands of the Republic of China in 1946
View attachment 344895
The British "Thames Chinese atlas" page 115th South China Sea Islands map. The company published in September 1974
View attachment 344896
In 1964, Taiwan published the "Republic of China" Atlas, Hainan Special Administrative Region
View attachment 344898
Vietnamese so funny!!Chinese has newly fabricated your map by ROC recently. So why PCA ruling on SCS dispute has said that history sea territory and nine dashed line claim by China is illegal.
Vietnam map dated back to 1600s stated that Islands in Vietnam's East sea is sea territory of Vietnam.
Vietnamese so funny!!
You should read more books.
You requested too much on him. This guy even could NOT read the Vietnam ancient books. Because these books are unfortunately all in Chinese.Vietnamese so funny!!
You should read more books.
It is said that Vietnam's ancient books are used in Chinese characters.You requested too much on him. This guy even could NOT read the Vietnam ancient books. Because these books are unfortunately all in Chinese.
For example, the map he just pasted, the map is said to come from a booked called as: 天南四致路图书全集.
View attachment 344916
However, in another website organized by Vietnam government, nghiencuubiendong.vn, the same book is called as: 天南四志路图书募集. So the question is, this book can only have one name, but whether it is "天南四致路图书全集", or "天南四志路图书募集"?
No one knows.
What's more ridiculous is, for such an important book to support Vietnam's claim on the South China Sea, we actually don't know where is the original version of this book!! Again from the VN webpage mentioned, the website said "we now can only read the replicated versions of this book"!
Replicated!!! You know, every one can add his own flavor to the book during every round of replicate.
@kecho the content below comes from the link given. For the highlighted part, let me make a quick translation to you: for the book《天南四志路图书募集》and《天南四志路图书》, what we can read today, no matter in Vietnam, or in foreign countries, are all replicated versions created by the later generations.
View attachment 344917
http://nghiencuubiendong.vn/cn/basi...ocation-and-geography/721-2012-02-11-19-43-24
You requested too much on him. This guy even could NOT read the Vietnam ancient books. Because these books are unfortunately all in Chinese.
For example, the map he just pasted, the map is said to come from a booked called as: 天南四致路图书全集.
View attachment 344916
However, in another website organized by Vietnam government, nghiencuubiendong.vn, the same book is called as: 天南四志路图书募集. So the question is, this book can only have one name, but whether it is "天南四致路图书全集", or "天南四志路图书募集"?
No one knows.
What's more ridiculous is, for such an important book to support Vietnam's claim on the South China Sea, we actually don't know where is the original version of this book!! Again from the VN webpage mentioned, the website said "we now can only read the replicated versions of this book"!
Replicated!!! You know, every one can add his own flavor to the book during every round of replicate.
@kecho the content below comes from the link given. For the highlighted part, let me make a quick translation to you: for the book《天南四志路图书募集》and《天南四志路图书》, what we can read today, no matter in Vietnam, or in foreign countries, are all replicated versions created by the later generations.
View attachment 344917
http://nghiencuubiendong.vn/cn/basi...ocation-and-geography/721-2012-02-11-19-43-24
kecho full time job is spreading lies all these years, he thinks posting these stuff will gain international recognition and support.
haha, a book with NO consistent name, and no one knows what the author said exactly in the original version! you even cite this as the core historic evidence for vn claim on the south China sea islands! what a strong and convincing proof! haha, enjoy your book.Any case, the ancient book has stated clearly that the Islands does belong to Vietnam territory, part of Quang Ngai Province Vietnam.