TaiShang
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2014
- Messages
- 27,848
- Reaction score
- 70
- Country
- Location
The Russians are chess masters, their actions in Syria is a brilliant aggressive move. The US can only stand by as the terrorists are bombed to shreds. I guess the lack of American action in Georgia, Crimea, DPRK has put a huge dent on US image so that's why they feel it's necessary to send 1 destroyer and not the whole fleet. Twenty years ago when the risk of war was high between Mainland and Taiwan the US send the whole fleet to warn China and slapped Chen in the face telling him to STFU and no independence declaration. This time instead of a warning in the shape of an armada, only 1 destroyer sailed the area being trailed by 2 Chinese warships. Mark my words in 2-3 decades from today we will have a full fleet of modernized destroyers, stealth fighters, better subs and naval armada of our own.
Exactly. That's why I keep reminding that contexts are as important as facts.
In the larger historical context, the progress made is obvious.
The world not only ignores the US rhetoric of freedom (of anything, be it an abstract idea of democracy or maritime navigation), but also ridicules it.
Has the world given a crap about US complaints over China-Russia veto on US military action against Syria?
Even Europeans applauded the action because they are fed up with being dragged into wars and conflicts orchestrated by the US regime elites.
The present situation in SCS is a matter of soft management as well as hard power projection. Without being dragged into an open conflict, China continues to soft-manage the US by responding its aggressions firmly.
This incident does expose the need for new countermeasure, something after an initial but ineffective "warning" or "chasing off", but before last option of "firing the first shot". An example is "ramming" used by Soviet Navy in Black Sea.
In February 1988 the USS Yorktown CG48 was rammed by a Soviet Naval vessel in Black Sea.
Everyone backed off after the ram "as usual", quoted by a crew on-board, the incident didn't escalate to exchange of fire.
Soviet Ships rams USS Yorktown in the Black Sea - CNN iReport
My recommendation is PLAN (and/or other maritime law enforcement branches) should develop protocols accordingly, maybe even purposely built assets, so that more non-lethal options of different intensity levels are available to counter similar incident before using the last option of "fire".
That's exactly what has been suggested by the Navy spokesperson the other day. I guess China is preparing new contingency measures.