Economic superpower
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- May 6, 2014
- Messages
- 1,265
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
What's wrong with us exploring resources in our sea? I don't see anything wrong with it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Since we already sent our coast guard to this area to confront the Chinese, we might as well use this opportunity to grab a few Paracel reefs too since the location of this rig is very near the Paracel.
The range is your enemy as you don't have the capabilities to put a sizeable jets all in once at the same time to give u the numerical superiority over our 36 Flankers.
When you run out of fuel or on your way home to do your refueling, even our Mig21 parked along the coast can attack you. Your frigates and destroyers will be countered by our low flying Su22 which are armed with KH-31 missiles or our Su30 which are armed with standoff range missiles like the KH-59mk.
I'm pretty sure our military feels more than confident with our 36 Flankers and 40 Su22 to deal with China in the SCS conflict that's why we chose to spend $3 billion for the submarines instead of using that money for another 60 Flankers.
It's interesting how you talk about parking your SAMs on your reefs while our newly acquired EXTRA rocket with low CEP can take them out with ease..not to mention we have real islands in the SCS that we can park our S-300 too. At this moment, we hold the military advantage over the conflict in the SCS, my friend.
If the American are willing to sell us the F-35 like they're willing to sell us the nuke reactor, I would say the time has come for us to retake the Paracel by force.War with the PLA will mean disaster to the Viets. So there won't be a war.
Even if they are willing to sell, you folks can't afford it. 200m USD per plane. Save your money for the Asian games or feed the poor.If the American are willing to sell us the F-35 like they're willing to sell us the nuke reactor, I would say the time has come for us to retake the Paracel by force.
The garrison on the Paracel is weak, a preemptive strike can take it back pretty quick. Once we retake the Paracel, we would need to set up SAM on the island pretty quick. Keeping it is more difficult as we would have to face air attack from you. With a single F-35 can shoot down 3 J-20, the addition of the F-35 will help secure the air from any attack right away.
Okay You do not believe me and our propaganda alsoVietnam attack laos? when?
i know chinaman is being lied by government but at this rate is unbelievable
and about cambodia, they firstly attacked us
Okay You do not believe me and our propaganda also
Just google "Viet attack Laos", you believe google ,right ?
And Many Viet members in PDF admit this , you guys want to unify Mekong region.
44 ships ?16 Vietnamese ships against 44 Chinese ships。
China expanded the restricted area in response to Vietnam‘s attempt to force its way into an earlier declared no-sail zone。
Yeah。Very true。And these guys eaily get high on wet dreams。
Why do you keep depending on the USA to help get it back? Use your own sweat and blood to get it. Build your own jets and weapons for a change!If the American are willing to sell us the F-35 like they're willing to sell us the nuke reactor, I would say the time has come for us to retake the Paracel by force.
The garrison on the Paracel is weak, a preemptive strike can take it back pretty quick. Once we retake the Paracel, we would need to set up SAM on the island pretty quick. Keeping it is more difficult as we would have to face air attack from you. With a single F-35 can shoot down 3 J-20, the addition of the F-35 will help secure the air from any attack right away.