What's new

Sonu Nigam tweets against Azaan, creates a controversy

:lol::lol:

Nizam was against partition and whatever the problem was created was because of the Naziri Qasim Rizvi who was from Awadh and was funded by Raja of Mahmudabad.

You mean the Raja of Mahmudabad named Mohammad Amir Ahmed Khan ?

One would be misled to believe that the "Raja" was actually a hindu, though I am sure that was not your intention, was it ? :coffee:
 
.
You mean the Raja of Mahmudabad named Mohammad Amir Ahmed Khan ?

One would be misled to believe that the "Raja" was actually a hindu, though I am sure that was not your intention, was it ? :coffee:

Hindu means from Indian nation but he was Naziri .
 
. .
ganeshguri-1.jpg



Ganesh Temple in Guwahati (Representational Image). Source: Wikimedia Commons
http://indianexpress.com/article/in...ent-zone-around-all-religious-places-4633756/

THE DISTRICT Magistrate of Kamrup (Metro) district, which includes Guwahati city and its suburbs, has declared a radius of 100 metres from “all prominent religious places” under his jurisdiction — including temples, mosques, gurudwaras and churches — as a “silent zone”. According to a notification issued Friday evening, DM M Angamuthu has also asked the State Pollution Control Board to submit a monthly report on noise pollution in these zones.

The notification states that it was issued in “compliance of the direction received from the Government of Assam”. It states that the decision was taken under Rule 3 (2) of the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000, of the Environment Protection Act of 1986. The notification, however, does not directly refer to the use of microphones and loudspeakers in places of worship.

When contacted by The Sunday Express, Angamuthu declined to comment on the contents of the notification. “Anyway, the use of loudspeakers is not permitted between 10 pm and 6 am,” he said. Officials from the BJP-led government in Assam were not available for comment. Rule 3 of the Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000, of the Environment Protection Act of 1986, deals with “ambient air quality standards in respect of noise for different areas/zones”.

Rule 3 (2) states that the “State Government may categorise the areas into industrial, commercial, residential or silence areas/zones for the purpose of implementation of noise standards for different areas”. According to the notification, the five areas marked as silent zones in Guwahati include all government and private hospitals; educational institutions; the high court, district and sessions court and the CJM’s court; all government offices; and, “all prominent religious places inclusive of temples, gurudwaras, mosques, churches, monastery, math and naam-ghar, etc”.

The notification states that officials of the Public Works Department have been asked to place proper signages in the notified areas within 15 days. The State Pollution Control Board has been asked to collect, compile and publish technical and statistical data relating to noise pollution as well as measures taken for its effective prevention and control, it says. The issue of loudspeakers being used at places of worship was the subject of a heated debate on social media recently after singer Sonu Nigam wrote that he had been woken by the azaan and questioned the use of loudspeakers at places of worship.

On April 16, Nigam posted on his official Twitter account: “God bless everyone. I’m not a Muslim and I have to be woken up by the Azaan in the morning. When will this forced religiousness end in India.” In another tweet, he wrote: “I don’t believe in any temple or gurudwara using electricity to wake up people who don’t follow the religion. Why then..? Honest? True?”
kamrup-district-map.jpg
 
.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/chand...rophones-hc/story-6nd5XOB6pvRCPwGggeZ8UM.html
The Punjab and Haryana high court has said that while Azaan is undoubtedly an integral part of Islam, it does not necessarily have to be blared through loudspeakers.

A single-judge bench comprising justice MMS Bedi made this observation in connection with a plea filed against singer Sonu Nigam over a series of comments posted on Twitter last month. Terming the petition as a “cheap” attempt to gain publicity, justice Bedi said: “A fair interpretation of the words used by respondent no 4 (Nigam) clearly indicates that the word ‘gundagardi’ in tweet no 4 is not addressed in the context of Azaan but the use of loudspeakers and amplifiers.”

The petition filed by Aas Mohammad, a resident of Sonepat in Haryana, had sought launching of criminal proceedings against Nigam. He claimed that the singer’s tweets violated the Muslim community’s fundamental right to manage religious affairs as enshrined in the Constitution, and also hurt the religious sentiments of a section of the population.

“I’m not a Muslim, and I have to be woken up by the Azaan in the morning. When will this forced religiousness end in India?” Nigam had tweeted on April 17, creating an uproar among netizens and celebrities alike. Later, a fatwa was also issued against the actor.

Referring to various judgments, justice Bedi said the matter of allowing loudspeakers for religious purposes had previously been taken up for consideration in the M Veerateswaran vs deputy collector case by the Madras high court. The bench, comprising justice K Sampath, had observed that no religion prescribes blaring prayers through sound amplifiers.

“If the contents of the complaint are seen in the context of Section 295-A of the Indian Penal Code (hurting religious sentiments), the words used in the tweet are not meant to insult any religion or religious belief of any class of citizens, and are apparently not deliberate or malicious,” justice Bedi held, adding that the petition was just a cheap way of gaining publicity by making a well-known singer a “scapegoat” in the name of religion.

Such practices deserve to be deprecated, the high court bench said while dismissing the plea.

tags
 
. .
Ever since Sonu Nigam's infamous rants, today, after 25 days, he got 4 lakh Twitter followers within this period.
 
. . . .
.
Leftists and mooslims are censoring patriots and truth speakers across the globe on all social media.

youtube = demonitizing videos

facebook = becoming sharia compliant and removing "blasphemous" content

twitter = saudi brince owns it now

but the truth will still prevail.
 
.
Leftists and mooslims are censoring patriots and truth speakers across the globe on all social media.

youtube = demonitizing videos

facebook = becoming sharia compliant and removing "blasphemous" content

twitter = saudi brince owns it now

but the truth will still prevail.

Please do not use the term "mooslims"

I find it very derogatory.

You don't find us calling you Hindoos do you?
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom