Sonny Bill Williams: Rugby star latest to criticise China over Uighurs

[KungFuLee]

If you can prove it is another CGTN and China Daily outlet, you are already wrong in your claim that

look, I don't need to do that, because that is not a publication, that is personal opinion. Like you, you have your opinion, you think Kazakh defend China, like me, I don't think so, I think it was neutral. That channel is just like that, if we have to say he is in any sort of authority, then how about your opinion? How about mine?

I ask you to show me one publication, not a personal opinion on the issue, you still have not find it yet, so what do you want me to proof?

A pathetic way trying to divert the topic.

A real pathetic way to divert the topic is this statement.

You don't understand what I ask, instead, you try to find just about anything even remotely unrelated to try to prove your point.

Now, that is the real pathetic attempt.

 

[beijingwalker]

look, I don't need to do that, because that is not a publication, that is personal opinion. Like you, you have your opinion, you think Kazakh defend China, like me, I don't think so, I think it was neutral. That channel is just like that, if we have to say he is in any sort of authority, then how about your opinion? How about mine?

I ask you to show me one publication, not a personal opinion on the issue, you still have not find it yet, so what do you want me to proof?

Everyone can see that you are trying to deny the obvious, that's actually becoming more and more funny, but anyway, China definitely hopes to see that "nuetral comment" as much as possible from all countries in the world, you can encourage them to make more of this kind of " neutral comments".

You don't understand what I ask, instead, you try to find just about anything even remotely unrelated to try to prove your point.

Now, that is the real pathetic attempt.

I guess people who go through all those previous posts in this thread will know who is being pathetic. lol, this is a very "neutral" statement.

 

[KungFuLee]

Everyone can see that you are trying to deny the obvious, that's actually becoming more and more funny, but anyway, China definitely hopes to see that "nuetral comment" as much as possible from all countries in the world, you can encourage them to make more of this kind of " neutral comments".

Again, where is "Everyone" come from? "Dozens of Reporter" or that channel?

By the way, if you really watch the video you post as refernce, you should be able to find the channel owner comment. Which said

"Next, he doubts that Russia's good friend China has concentration camps for muslim"

Even in his own word, he didn't say "The president denied there are concentration camp in China", he said the president "doubts", which is what I said in the beginning, which mean it needs verification.

So, again, what do you want me to proof? When he is saying exactly what I was saying in my first post?

I guess people who go through all those previous posts in this thread will know who is being pathetic. lol, this is a very "neutral" statement.

lol, again, where do you get your Master Degree? I would like to know.

 

[beijingwalker]

Again, where is "Everyone" come from? "Dozens of Reporter" or that channel?

By the way, if you really watch the video you post as refernce, you should be able to find the channel owner comment. Which said

Haha, it's not about what the channel stands, it's about what they believe he was saying, it's an Ukraine channel, of course they don't agree with him, but that also means they understand what he said.

lol, again, where do you get your Master Degree? I would like to know.

How old are you? We are here talking about the post , not people, you want to know? sound so funny and demanding, why I have to tell you and what does it have to do with what we are talking in this thread?

 

[KungFuLee]

Haha, it's not about what the channel stands, it's about what they believe he was saying, it's an Ukraine channel, of course they don't agree with him, but that also means they understand what he said.

The things, that channel say the exact same thing I said.

This is what I said in my first post

You know that does not mean it is not true. That just mean they need verification.

This is what he said in the comment inside the video.

"Next, he doubts that Russia's good friend China has concentration camps for muslim"

So if you believe I am wrong, then by definition, he is wrong as well, so again, what do you want me to proof?

How old are you? We are here talking about the post , not people, you want to know? sound so funny and demanding, why I have to tell you and what does it have to do with what we are talking in this thread?

Whoa, slow down, don't need to get defensive on this, this is just a question, seems like the organisation you get your master degree from is very open to giving out diploma, which is just what my cousin need.

If you don't like it, you don't need to tell me. LOL

 

[beijingwalker]

The things, that channel say the exact same thing I said.

This video has a very clear title which clearly summarized the content of the video.

Whoa, slow down, don't need to get defensive on this, this is just a question, seems like the organisation you get your master degree from is very open to giving out diploma, which is just what my cousin need.

A typical cheap shot when losing a debate and become so upset, haha, I still won't tell you.lol..

 

[KungFuLee]

This video has a very clear title which clearly summarized the content of the video.

So if a youtube video title "Angelina Jolie naked" does that mean it have to be Angelina Jolie must be naked in this video? Every heard of what is "Click-Baiting"? Or RickRolling?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rickrolling
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clickbait

It in his own comment, I mean I did not write those thing up, he did.

Afik all it show is you are too gullible, and believe what people write in the title and did not go into detail.​

A typical cheap shot when losing a debate and become so upset, haha, I still won't tell you.lol..

Me upset? Why would I? I am winning this argument at the moment.

 

[beijingwalker]

So if a youtube video title "Angelina Jolie naked" does that mean it have to be Angelina Jolie must be naked in this video? Every heard of what is "Click-Baiting"? Or RickRolling?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rickrolling
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clickbait

It in his own comment, I mean I did not write those thing up, he did.

Afik all it show is you are too gullible, and believe what people write in the title and did not go into detail.​

Me upset? Why would I? I am winning this argument at the moment.

Haha, you are winning...ok, good boy.

The title shows what the channel thinks he was doing, so you previous claim that only CGTN and China Daily tow the line believing he was defending China is wrong, you are just denying this simple fact, it's hilarious.

 

[KungFuLee]

Haha, you are winning...ok, good boy.

The title shows what the channel thinks he was doing, so you previous claim that only CGTN and China Daily tow the line believing he was defending China is wrong, you are just denying this simple fact, it's hilarious.

Again, all it show is that you take the face value of someone's word, if you read further, you would know he did not even mean that. And this only show you are going to be susceptible to fraud, and you don't watch/read your own reference before you use them, nothing more.

And you win? LOL, let's recheck what you bring to the table?

1.) "Dozen's" reporter represent the world view, hence the whole world (Your exact word) is seeing that Kazakh president is defending China
2.) Just 1 piece of article mean everyone is thinking that.
3.) You got clickbaited and post a video with the title suitable for your contex, however, the video itself is echoing my context.

So, tell me, what is it that you are winning?

 

[beijingwalker]

Again, all it show is that you take the face value of someone's word

The Ukraine channel also takes the "face value" of it, so you are wrong, not only CGTN and China Daily tow the line in believing he was defending China.

3.) You got clickbaited and post a video with the title suitable for your contex, however, the video itself is echoing my context.

I swear I didn't make that title, it was the title made by the Ukraine news channel.

 

[KungFuLee]

The Ukraine channel also takes the "face value" of it, so you are wrong, not only CGTN and China Daily tow the line in believing he was defending China.

The thing is, he wasn't, and he certainly does not represent all Ukrainian.

I don't understand you, normally you just admitted you got clickbaited and move on, is winning an argument on an internet forum is so important to you? Lol, I meant if I got clickbaited, I would admit to it and move on.

I swear I didn't make that title, it was the title made by the Ukraine news channel.

Do you even know what is clickbaiting?

IN a youtube video, you use sensational headline in the title to draw suckers in, and then when they open that video, it is a completely different thing. Like I can post a video on youtube title "Taylor Swift Naked Photo" and people want to see Taylor Swift naked would open my video, and then they were met with something else. and I got the click I wanted.

And you my friend, sadly, was one of those suckers......

 

[beijingwalker]

The thing is, he wasn't? And he certainly does not represent all Ukrainian.

He was or wasn't , but that's still what the Ukraine channel believes he was doing, so your previous comment is wrong. that's a simple fact.

Do you even know what is clickbaiting?

IN a youtube video, you use sensational headline in the title to draw suckers in, and then when they open that video, it is a completely different thing.

And you my friend, sadly, was one of those suckers......

标题党, I didn't make that title, Ukraine new channel did, you can blame them for that.

 

[KungFuLee]

He was or wasn't , but that's still what the Ukraine channel believes he was doing, so your previous comment is wrong. that's a simple fact.

You tell me.

In the title, he said China does not have Concentration Camp, in the video, he said Kazakh President doubt there are camp exist in China.

标题党, I didn't make that title, Ukraine new channel did, you can blame them for that.

I did, again, do you understand what is click bait? It's never the suckers fault clicking on a title that was not meant to be in line with the video. He is the one that make that video, he is click baiting you and you just got click baited.

 

[beijingwalker]

You tell me.

In the title, he said China does not have Concentration Camp, in the video, he said Kazakh President doubt there are camp exist in China.

He didn't say yes or China has concentration camps, but he says western reports are wrong with certainty, that translate as defending China, my argument is he is defending China and yours is he is being neutral. The video thinks he is defending China that's why the video tries to refute him from Ukraine's point of view.

again, do you understand what is click bait?

标题党, Can you read Chinese by the way?

 

[KungFuLee]

He didn't say yes or China has concentration camps, but he says western reports are wrong with certainty, that translate as defending China, my argument is he is defending China and yours is he is being neutral. The video thinks he is defending China that's why the video tries to refute him from Ukraine's point of view.

lol, how that translate to defending China.

He did not say China have concentration camp, but he did not say China didn't. Again, the video is about how he try to stay neutral, and as I explained to you already, the reporter try to spin him into defame China he wouldn't play ball, if it stop there, then yes, he have a point defending China, but then he also wash his hand on this issue by saying this is not his country business as those are Chinese not Kazakh. In simple mathematic term, one point pro and one point against, that's the definition of neutral.

And for the final time, that video is NOT UKRAINE POINT OF VIEW. Just a point of view of someone in Ukraine, which actually we don't even know if he is indeed in Ukraine or is actually is an Ukrainian, for all I know, he could be a Russian or even Chinese.

标题党, Can you read Chinese by the way?

Can you read English?