because the real mastermind is USA and the slave EU ..
what or who do you think is behind the recent venezuela protests and uprisings etc in iran , in tunesia, in egypt, in syria, in bangladesh, and so on?
That may be a possibility. I was very surprised to see the Western media's reaction and reporting of the coup. Coups are never a good thing, the most undemocratic and has serious implications for business confidence. That confidence takes years to recover. I saw Anderson Cooper's (of CNN) expression....like as if he was upset that the coup wasn't successful. And these are the international faces of American media?
The EU however is gradually moving away from the US influence. The proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) had already failed to make any progress (though, they haven't made it official yet). It will wind up in failure. The Asian one will probably face the same fate, but it has more promise however.
As for Bangladesh, there hadn't been any real uprising. But there were however big changes back in 2008 when a military backed emergency government was placed. In 2009, our brightest and most senior military officers were slaughtered during what was apparently a mutiny. A lot of things happened on the inside. Democracy gradually died with Bangladesh becoming a one-party state. The ideological instigator here was not the US. Generally, small countries like Bangladesh are inconsequential for the US. The ideological divisions in Bangladesh however are very real.
erdogan wanted an axis against the wahabi saudi part.. it could be established when egypt turkey and some others like indonesia, pakistan and bangladesh would be the counterpart.. how? by support of democratic islamic partys .. since US and Saudi arabia dont want this and fear it it could never happen..
It would be important to acknowledge that Bangladesh is a long and complicated matter.
Turkey's policy about middle east is gone very wrong since the "arab spring". We are thinking that Assad would be gone like Moubarak, Kadafi and Ben Ali....but the butcher has managed to stay with blood bath.
Worst we lost Egypt too with the new dictator Sisi.
I understand Erdogan decision at that time (frankly everbody bett on about Assad's end in 2011), but now Erdogan must see that the ME will not be what he want and he must adapt (Make peace with Assad and other leader of the region and then attack the PKK and their proxie).
Isis is Turkey's ennemy but for Turkey, PKK (which is more and more apreciat by the west) is the bigger menace.
The only thing lacking in Syria is a political horizon. The current solution by the relevant powers is the best for now. There is unfortunately nothing better.
The west like PKK because they are fighting Isis (PKK is fighting Daech because of land control), and they dont care about PKK terror action in Turkey.
They dont like Erdogan because he is not a yes man or western pupet. Don't misundertand, Erdogan has many fault, which many Turk dont like him for, but the west dont like him for this sole reason : he is not their pupet.
I always found the Kurdish separatists as a controversial lot. I remember how the Western media gathered sympathy for the Halabja gas massacre. Let's be honest here, without the support from the Kurds, the Americans would not have been able to conduct operations in Iraq way back in the First Gulf War. I'm very certain that American Special Forces were there early on during the same theater of war. Otherwise, it would not have been possible for them to conduct operations with such ease in another continent.
So, that could be part of the explanation.
Another thing is that violent third party groups allow governments to officially say that they denied any involvement. Once these groups are of no use, they'll just throw them under the bus. The CIA's alleged support for the Contra Rebels in Nicaragua turned out to be a documented fact. And that partly explains how drugs come into the US. Some conspiracy theories do turn out to be true it appears.
Little do they know that the Kurdish separatists will ultimately be victims of their own folly.
And I don't think any serious media in the west has say that Erdogan was the masterminded of the failed coup.
Not necessarily from any 'serious' media. But many Westerners (particularly right-wing) do believe that. I saw their comments everyday. Yes they can be ignored and pretend that they are nutjobs. But Donald Trump and the support he bellies upon changed that view.
I know nothing about Bangladesh and even less about their political party.
But dont presume that Erdogan's AKP will give a systematic support to Islamist party, because AKP are secular party compared to Arab islamic party.
Hell even after 15 years, Erdogan has never put a islamic law in Turkey.
True. And that is because secularism works.
Bangladesh is a complicated matter.
I don't know what they plan but they really concentrade on turkey.. they talk many many times about us..
look at this
totally crap jornalism.. they act like he is a thread and maybe they will be attacked that is what their brains tell them..
they ignore their own problems the real things that happen in germany like their antiislamism racism and an growing extremism by kurds.. I highly think it is planned that they make right wing parties like afd and other stronger by their politics and the jornalism of fear.. with their jornalism they managed to frighten the puplic and they managed to make it normal to be extreem right wing and have racist minds.. he old germany did not have that you couöld not act this way in puplic many germans had this thoughts in their mind but they could not say it they managed to break through
It is usually easier to blame domestic problems on foreigners (perceived or otherwise). Even though, they have the resources to mitigate those problems.
Sounds awfully familiar...
