Sleeping dragon no more: China about to replace US as strongest naval power and Washington is too la

[ohmrlobalobayeh]

Not enough for DF-21D .

not proven.

acknowledge it, China still has a long way to catch up.

give another 10 years.

 

[BringHarmony]

Not enough for DF-21D .

DF-21D is an untested weapon. Will not be able to work against US missile shield and not to mention, the final satellite guidance can be denied by simply disabling all Chinese sats. Its a hoax.

US Ageis missile shield can easily take out weapons like DF-21D.

 

[BringHarmony]

range. those r for near seas only. This is why the usn has zero frigates.

There are 20 planned
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FFG(X)

 

[beijingwalker]

DF-21D is an untested weapon.

They are not there for nothing, saturation attack by them can sink all kinds of ships. testing them can be at expense of US carriers, I wonder if US want them to be tested or forever not be tested.

 

[BringHarmony]

They are not there for nothing, saturation attack by them can sink all kinds of ships. testing them can be at expense of US carriers, I wonder if US want them to be tested or forever not be tested.

Saturation attack without guidance is like trying to hit a moving car with eyes closed. Even if you use a shot gun, its unlikely.

Oh and China does a lot of things for "nothing".

Only Gerald Ford aircraft carrier can sink more than half of US navy. Small Chinese likes to talk big.

There is a saying : Largest airforce? USAF. Second largest? USN.

 

[beijingwalker]

Only Gerald Ford aircraft carrier can sink more than half of US navy. Small Chinese likes to talk big.

No, it's US talking about China threat for years.

China's military power already on par with US in East Asia
https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/China-s-military-power-already-on-par-with-US-in-East-Asia

China’s vast fleet is tipping the balance in the Pacific
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/china-army-navy/

Saturation attack without guidance is like trying to hit a moving car with eyes closed. Even if you use a shot gun, its unlikely.

Beidou is more accurate than GPS, we don't worry about that.

 

[BringHarmony]

Folks did you notice one thing as well? All these Chinese naval forces ASSUME that US will be in China's backyard. Meanwhile nothing comes in US backyard. Tells you the difference in power.

Think in this way : US can easily blockade China in mallaca strait, indian ocean and perssian bay. So without even stepping in the vicinity of China, US can do enough damage to Chinese economy and military.

No, it's US talking about China threat for years.

Of course they will, that way they get the funding from public.

Beidou is more accurate than GPS, we don't worry about that.

It won't survive in war. US can and will easily take out ALL your sats.

 

[beijingwalker]

Folks did you notice one thing as well? All these Chinese naval forces ASSUME that US will be in China's backyard. Meanwhile nothing comes in US backyard. Tells you the difference in power.
.

No one denies US still has a solid lead over other navies, but China and US don't seem to go to a war now, the future conflicts can be decades away, I m talking about the future trend.

It won't survive in war. US can and will easily take out ALL your sats.

So will China, China launches much more satelites each year than any other countries now and can also shoot down more than anyone can, what China can do the best is mass producing everything.

 

[BringHarmony]

No one denies US still has a solid lead over other navies, but China and US don't seem to go to a war now, the future conflicts can be decades away, I m talking about the future trend.

Future no one knows. It can happen in a day or in 100 years.

 

[beijingwalker]

Future no one knows. It can happen in a day or in 100 years.

I bet it won't happen in a day, wanna bet?

 

[BringHarmony]

So will China, China launches much more satelites each year than any other countries now and can also shoot down more than anyone can, what China can do the best is mass producing everything.

It does not matter. Once your sats are out, your anti carrier ballistic missiles are dead weights. From there, US navy can destroy all your sea and land based assets without even coming in range of your weapons.

I bet it won't happen in a day, wanna bet?

Wanna bet China will all the newfangled weapons even in 10 years? It just cancelled quite a few carriers. As I said, no one knows the future.

 

[Pakistani Fighter]

range

Corvette has better range?

 

[beijingwalker]

It does not matter. Once your sats are out, your anti carrier ballistic missiles are dead weights. From there, US navy can destroy all your sea and land based assets without even coming in range of your weapons.

China can also say the once we take out all US space assets US ships will not know where to go, that's just your fantacy.

 

[BringHarmony]

China can also say the once we take out all US space assets US ships will not know where to go, that's just your fantacy.

Not true! F35s will still be able to pound your navy and costal assets. The number of F35s on US carriers is simply too big.

Besides China does not have ability to take out all of US Sats.

DF-21D was supposed to be a unconvential equalizer for difference in carriers. Its a dud.

 

[beijingwalker]

Not true! F35s will still be able to pound your navy and costal assets. The number of F35s on US carriers is simply too big.

Besides China does not have ability to take out all of US Sats.

DF-21D was supposed to be a unconvential equalizer for difference in carriers. Its a dud.

Lol, I m not interested in mouth war, tell your admirals to try, China dares them.