How about this conundrum for you guys. Two states.
India has the worlds largest number of starving in the world which might or might
NOT be such a bad thing as it has
largest percentage of people
defecating on the streets. God help us if all of India was well fed. All that
extra eating would mean extra
shatting that would turn South Asia into a right
stink.
India has amongst the
largest number of people living in
slums or actually sleeping on the
streets. Hell they even make movies about
City of Joy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia or
Slumdog Millionaire - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It has
2 million of it's poor driven to
pull rickshaws something that our forefathers let donkeys do or other beasts of burden. This means a man's value is below a animal or why would man do something that rest of the world makes donkeys do?
Millions are
starving with more
hungry in India then even Africa. Indian's do their best to hide this fact by using the term "South Asia. They avoid using this for dear death when talking about history or anything positive but SA is used for poverty so their terrible record can be mixed and diluted with their neighbours.
And then comes the news as evidenced by OP. After all these facts apparently
India is
"happenen place" and "
going places"
And
Pakistan which consistantly comes out better fed, better clothed, better sanitation, better housed, cleaner and as a example Pakistan banned beast man rickshaw pullers all the way back in 1949. This of course is
not to say our record is to be complacent about. No. We have a long way to go.
Yet here is the laugh. Apparently Pakistan is "failed". A average mutt would much prefer to live in failed Pakistan then happenen India. Ask this guy below along with his 2 million compatriots or the starving millions.