What's new

Sharif Risks Straining Ties with PakMil

fatman17

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
32,563
Reaction score
98
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Sharif risks straining ties with military, warns US intelligence report
Anwar Iqbal
52ebc9c70ef4f.jpeg

Lt Gen Raheel Sharif in a meeting with Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif at the PM House in Islamabad.—APP/File Photo
WASHINGTON: Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif may strain his relations with the new army chief if he continues to expand his policy-making powers, warns a US intelligence report.

The report, presented before the US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence on Wednesday, notes that Mr Sharif is seeking to “acquire a more central policy-making role” for civilians in areas that the Army has traditionally dominated.

“His push for an increased role in foreign policy and national security will probably test his relationship with the new Chief of Army Staff, particularly if the Army believes that the civilian government’s position impinges on Army interests” the report warns.

But it also notes that the prime minister has publically stated that the Army and the civilian government are “on the same page.”

The annual report is an assessment of the threats the United States may have to deal with in 2014 and is compiled jointly by all US intelligence agencies.

Pakistan figures prominently in a chapter on South Asia, which predicts that Prime Minister Sharif’s primary focus in 2014 will be on improving the economy, including the energy sector, and countering security threats.
The report says that Mr Sharif probably won the May 2013 election primarily because the previous government failed to improve either the economy or the generation of electricity.

It also notes that in September 2013, Islamabad secured an IMF program and met the conditions for fiscal and energy reforms under its three-year, $6.7 billion Extended Fund Facility. This paved the way for a second disbursement of $550 million in December.

But the report warns that “continued use of scarce foreign exchange reserves by the State Bank of Pakistan, to prop up the Pakistani rupee might make future disbursements difficult.”

The US intelligence community informs the Senate that Pakistan wants good relations with the United States “but cooperation with Washington will continue to be vulnerable to strains, particularly due to Pakistani sensitivities toward perceived violations of sovereignty.”

It notes that Prime Minister Sharif entered office seeking to establish good relations with the United States, especially in areas that support his primary domestic focus of improving the economy.

Mr Sharif and his advisers were pleased with his late October 2013 visit to Washington. Pakistan was eager to restart a “strategic dialogue’ and its offices and press have touted results of the initial meetings of several of the five workings that comprise the dialogue.

The report notes that Mr Sharif also seeks rapprochement with New Delhi in part in anticipation of increased trade, which would be beneficial to Pakistan’s economic growth. Mr Sharif will probably move cautiously to improve relations, however, and India also will probably not take any bold steps, particularly not before the Indian elections in Spring 2014.
 
.
“His push for an increased role in foreign policy and national security will probably test his relationship with the new Chief of Army Staff, particularly if the Army believes that the civilian government’s position impinges on Army interests” the report warns.

Foreign Policy is completely under purview of government , so is National Security . Army can advise/insist on National Security but Foreign Policy is a Big NO NO or am i missing something here ??
 
.
The fact is that foreign policy where India, USA, China and Afghanistan are concerned will always be controlled by the Army due to security concerns. However, at best, the government would act on issues pertaining to these countries only with advice from the Army. Any unilateral foray into this realm will be nipped in the bud.
 
.
just like India's Kashmir/Pakistan/China policy is controlled by military and militarism.

Nothing too different from Pakistan.

USA will not be interested in Pakistan if it was not for American militarism. Thus our relationship with Americans have always been driven by military interests

in USA, politicians take pride of their own military service, and American' militarism.

the difference is that Pakistani politicians are idiots when they think they know more than military when it comes to regional policy. And in their stupidity try to undercut Pak military.

For NS jury is still out if he has learned a lesson from his past mistakes.



And thus they muck up political system AND military system.


peace
 
.
Foreign Policy is completely under purview of government , so is National Security . Army can advise/insist on National Security but Foreign Policy is a Big NO NO or am i missing something here ??

You are missing which army the subject is being discussed about lol.
 
.
You are missing which army the subject is being discussed about lol.
Pakistan politicians fail to establish proper foreign policy school. Because their feudal mentality has no space for educated person, who has better governing ability ....But military has proper think tank segments who keep eye on changing geopolitical condition.
 
.
.....as long as he consults the military in the NSC of which the military is a member its ok. unilateral decisions can / will lead to issues. NS has a history of doing things without consulting (except for his inner chamchas)
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom