What's new

Sharif raises alarm over Taliban

s90

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 28, 2008
Messages
1,313
Reaction score
1
NEW YORK: Former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has expressed concern about a controversial peace deal Zardari government signed with militants and decried they (militants) are trying to export their particularly harsh version of sharia.
In an interview published in USA today Sharif asked rhetorically ‘how do we deal with the situation in Swat?’ Sharif observed ‘they are now threatening to get out of Swat and take other areas into their custody. So we've got to avoid that situation.’

Nawaz Sharif asserted ‘any deal with militants should include commitments that ‘democracy will not be allowed to deteriorate and the writ of the government will be honored,’ adding that women's schools and universities must be allowed to stay open.

The newspaper said Sharif who had called for a ‘revolution’ to topple the government backed off from criticising Zardari saying he wants to work with ruling coalition.

In the interview conducted in Lahore, Sharif downplayed fears that the nuclear-armed country could be taken over by Taliban militants, who are gaining strength both in Pakistan and in neighboring Afghanistan, where they are battling US and Nato troops.

Sharif stressed the insurgency in Swat and border areas could be defused in just two years if sufficient economic development took place.

USA today said Sharif, who served two terms as prime minister in the 1990s before he was ousted in a military coup, is in a strong political position once again after staring down his rival, President Asif Ali Zardari, last month in a confrontation over the independence of Pakistan's courts.

After talking of a ‘prelude to revolution,’ Sharif escaped house arrest to lead thousands of protesters on a march toward the capital of Islamabad. The public pressure forced Zardari on March 15 to back down and reinstate judges purged by the previous, military regime.

The newspaper said that Sharif sounded triumphant. ‘My eyes still can't believe what they saw on the 15th of March,’ he said.

‘For the first time in the 60-year history of this country, a day had arrived when the people actually demonstrated their strength, their power. This nation stood up for its rights — and succeeded.’

Sharif avoided criticising Zardari directly during the interview and insisted that he wants to work with the ruling coalition, led by the president's Pakistan Peoples Party.

Sharif still wants Zardari to give up some of his presidential powers but says the dispute should be resolved in parliament, not on the streets.

‘This country cannot afford any confrontation,’ Sharif said. ‘We're not going to put our country in jeopardy (because of desire for) power. Grabbing power at any cost is not our motto.

‘Our motto is to get the country back on the rails of democracy, strengthen institutions like the judiciary and media and take necessary steps to prevent anybody from abrogating or suspending the constitution.’

Sharif has never been a Washington favorite. In the 1990s, his government tested a nuclear bomb, earning economic sanctions from the Clinton administration.

Sharif said he had a good relationship with President Clinton — and is a fan of President Obama. ‘I have never met Obama, but I have a good impression about him,’ he said.

‘I think he's a good guy.’ Since Obama took office, he said, US diplomats have been reaching out to him and to other political leaders.

Democratic politicians returned to power in parliamentary elections last year, and President Pervez Musharraf resigned.

Now, Sharif said, politicians must set aside their quarrels and work together to find solutions to the Taliban insurgency and Pakistan's other pressing needs.

‘This country is facing huge, huge problems — internal, external,’ he said. ‘It's very important that democracy deliver.’

The newspaper pointed out Sharif, head of the conservative Pakistan Muslim League, said that he opposes attacks by airborne US drones on militant hide-outs as ‘counterproductive’ and wants to see dialogue with more moderate Islamist groups.
 
.
‘This country is facing huge, huge problems — internal, external,’ he said.

Well, I'm sure that's true, but NS is the last person on this planet that would have any solutions to these so-called huge problems. We need new honest faces in this country. I still haven't forgotten how this man plundered and looted the wealth of ordinary Pakistanis. Why do I get the sense that no politician in Pakistan is sincere? These monsters are only willing to exploit and score cheap political points.
 
Last edited:
.
Sufi, Taliban must be fenced in after edicts

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

By Ansar Abbasi

ISLAMABAD: Maulana Sufi Muhammad’s demands for an Islamic justice system have been met but his latest edicts against the country’s judicial, parliamentary and constitutional system may deprive him of the fruit of his life-time achievement.

Undoubtedly the ANP government in the Frontier, the National Assembly of Pakistan and even President Asif Ali Zardari have agreed to support the Nizam-e-Adl Regulation for the sake of peace in Swat despite having different opinions on the issue.

The peace deal was being seen as a hope by many to secure the valley from being pushed back to pre-Feb 16 era of lawlessness, brutal killings, burning of girlsí schools, kidnapping for ransom and militancy. It should remain so and not be allowed to get derailed owing to a rash statement publicly made by Sufi Muhammad because any knee-jerk reaction can lead to a civil war there.

What Maulana Sufi Muhammad has uttered were his already known views but by expressing them in a public gathering at this crucial juncture of the Swat peace process the Tanzim Nifaz Shariat-e-Muhammadi (TNSM) chief has acted as a spoiler.

His decades long struggle for Islamic justice system in Swat and Malakand Division is in sight but now he himself has threatened the achievement of his life’s goal. Now many fear that after the implementation of the Nizam-e-Adl Regulation in Swat and the Malakand region, he would possibly try to extend his struggle to other parts of the country.

Despite all such fears and in the absence of any other option to address the Swat crisis, the provincial government is, however, still showing commendable restraint and struggling to regain its lost writ in the area through negotiated and peaceful means.

Maulana Sufi Muhammad’s statement that Pakistan’ democracy, its laws and judicial structure all are un-Islamic was rarely welcomed by any political leader, including even those belonging to religious political parties.

While the ANP, the PPP and the PML-N deliberately did not show any strong reaction to Sufi’s declaration perhaps to save the peace process from being ruined, it was the Jamaat-e-Islami chief Syed Munnawar Hasan and JUI-F’s Maulana Fazlur Rehman who clearly rejected the TNSM chiefís interpretation of Islam vis-‡-vis Pakistan’s democracy and judicial system.

Several Ulema from different schools of thought also argued against Sufi’s remarks. This is a unique situation and a possible opportunity for the government to sit down with all different political and religious parties and leading religious scholars and agree to a unified strategy whereby Sufi Muhammad or Taliban’s interpretation of Shariat should be restricted and not allowed to spread beyond their areas of control through public awareness campaigns to be launched jointly by the religious groups and political parties.

At the same time the government and the leading political parties are also required to distance themselves from the US war on terror, without which it may not be possible to check the spread of Talibanisation and extremism in society. In this situation where extremism is growing, the government should also avoid taking steps that may please Washington and other Western capitals but are considered un-Islamic internally.

Sufi, Taliban must be fenced in after edicts
 
.
It may be reaction of people against GoP for which Sufi is taking advantage.
In fact GoP failed to provide basic things to common people, justic,food and shelter.
If Sufi Shariah government is giving more salary to common talaban then grade 17 servent of GoP,naturally people will join them.

Economics always play major role in integration and disintegration of nations,Why all europian countries wants to EU ?
 
.
the about-face by NS and his PML-N is in response to the last mtg held by Mr's Hollbrook and Mullen with NS where it was indicated that the "US has no objection to NS becoming PM in the near future", there-in lies the sudden change of heart!. even the notoriously hawkish Ch. Nisar is seeing the Taliban through a different prism!!!
 
.
the about-face by NS and his PML-N is in response to the last mtg held by Mr's Hollbrook and Mullen with NS where it was indicated that the "US has no objection to NS becoming PM in the near future", there-in lies the sudden change of heart!. even the notoriously hawkish Ch. Nisar is seeing the Taliban through a different prism!!!

Unfortunately ,democracy never flourished in Pakistan ,initially feudel lord and then martial law pampered babies (nawaz,bhutto,altaf etc) destroyed all institutions of our country.

People of pakistam lost their trust on politicians and now religious fantics and jehadi mullah will also be failed.

You can not live in this world isolated , Talaban did same mistake what Sufi is repeating .
 
.
the about-face by NS and his PML-N is in response to the last mtg held by Mr's Hollbrook and Mullen with NS where it was indicated that the "US has no objection to NS becoming PM in the near future", there-in lies the sudden change of heart!. even the notoriously hawkish Ch. Nisar is seeing the Taliban through a different prism!!!

I don't care how the politicians get to this point, as long as the politicians get on the same page in terms of combating the extremist threat.

The Swat deal is going nowhere, Buner is pretty much lost at this point, and tough decisions need to be taken.

All major political parties have to be on board if (which shouldn't be in doubt, but who knows, its Pakistan) and when the decision to scrap the peace deal is taken, and take responsibility for the fallout.
 
Last edited:
.
the about-face by NS and his PML-N is in response to the last mtg held by Mr's Hollbrook and Mullen with NS where it was indicated that the "US has no objection to NS becoming PM in the near future", there-in lies the sudden change of heart!. even the notoriously hawkish Ch. Nisar is seeing the Taliban through a different prism!!!

You just took the words right out of my mouth sir:tup:. I was going to say the same. An immediate change of stance should clear the minds of Pakistanis how these political thugs under the command of their American masters play with the country at the expense of the country. NS is nothing more then a mere thug and a hypocrite. He needs US approval to become the PM of Pakistan makes me sick.:sick:
 
.
You just took the words right out of my mouth sir:tup:. I was going to say the same. An immediate change of stance should clear the minds of Pakistanis how these political thugs under the command of their American masters play with the country at the expense of the country. NS is nothing more then a mere thug and a hypocrite. He needs US approval to become the PM of Pakistan makes me sick.:sick:
Well you have to cut him a bit of slack given the role 'non-democratic' power centers have played in Government formations in the past.

Especially with Gen. Musharraf's open animosity towards him (along with the Bush administrations focus on BB), to the extent of granting a one sided amnesty to BB, Zardari and company, and leaving NS out cold.

Assurances from the US side may have allayed his apprehensions (accurate or not) over being kept out of power by undemocratic means.
 
.
Well you have to cut him a bit of slack given the role 'non-democratic' power centers have played in Government formations in the past.

Especially with Gen. Musharraf's open animosity towards him (along with the Bush administrations focus on BB), to the extent of granting a one sided amnesty to BB, Zardari and company, and leaving NS out cold.

Assurances from the US side may have allayed his apprehensions (accurate or not) over being kept out of power by undemocratic means.

For all what matters to me is if he needs assurances from the US for whatever may be the reason, then he should be booted out and so shall the PP and others. Politicians like him are the reason why for all these sixty plus years we could not shape a free foreign policy.
Musharraf was a different case, he knew exactly how to maintain a balance between the two sides and that is why he lost all US Support in the end though i agree he made certain bad decisions and it was too late for him to sail Pakistan away from the US NEXUS.
 
.
I don't care how the politicians get to this point, as long as the politicians get on the same page in terms of combating the extremist threat.

The Swat deal is going nowhere, Buner is pretty much lost at this point, and tough decisions need to be taken.

All major political parties have to be on board if (which shouldn't be in doubt, but who knows, its Pakistan) and when the decision to scrap the peace deal is taken, and take responsibility for the fallout.

and they are? u gave me a tough time on this one a few days ago in the TT! but thats OK!:enjoy:
 
.
For all what matters to me is if he needs assurances from the US for whatever may be the reason, then he should be booted out and so shall the PP and others. Politicians like him are the reason why for all these sixty plus years we could not shape a free foreign policy.
Musharraf was a different case, he knew exactly how to maintain a balance between the two sides and that is why he lost all US Support in the end though i agree he made certain bad decisions and it was too late for him to sail Pakistan away from the US NEXUS.

Well my point is that it is our political system that has allowed the perception to creep in that the US is calling the shots, and that includes Musharraf, since he played along with the US focus on BB, instead of offering a level playing field to both BB and Sharif.

Musharraf made a lot of mistakes in 2007, and the one sided NRO benefiting the PPP was one of them. Had the amnesty also included the Sharif brothers, we could have avoided at least one destabilizing event - the overthrow of the Punjab government through the disqualification of Shahbaz Sharif.

Leaving the Sharif brothers on the hook has allowed Zardari to play Machiavelli in Pakistani politics.
 
Last edited:
.
I don't care how the politicians get to this point, as long as the politicians get on the same page -
Aaarrgghhh! Don't you get it? If you value Pakistan as a representative democracy but your politicians aren't doing what you want, then it's up to you to take on the role of politician, even though that may be personally inconvenient.
 
.
and they are? u gave me a tough time on this one a few days ago in the TT! but thats OK!:enjoy:
If you go back to my first posts right after the Swat deal, I said I was extremely pessimistic over the chances of its success, but that it needed to be done given the constraints at the time.

How does that contradict with my position now?

I believe our discussions and disagreements on TT were over some other issue.
 
.
"...and they are? u gave me a tough time on this one a few days ago in the TT! but thats OK!"

You've been out in front of this. So too Muse, Rabzon, and All-Green-maybe Niaz and Mastan Khan. Others chip in now and again, showing glimpses only to slide back.

No sense committing too soon when you don't know which way the wind will blow.

The west just isn't the enemy here and while I think that there's a "hidden hand" of my own, they play a minor role compared to the obvious issues right before Pakistanis that require immediate attention as a matter of state.

Yeah, hope those tough decisions get made real soon...;)
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom