What's new

SC rejects Shahid Masood’s reply in Zainab case ‘Punishment as per law’

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
22,931
Reaction score
45
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
‘Punishment as per law’: SC rejects Shahid Masood’s reply in Zainab case


Listen


291455_5483539_updates.jpg


ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court rejected TV anchor Shahid Masood’s reply on Monday and observed that he will be dealt as per the law as it found allegations made by him in Zainab rape and murder case false.

Shahid Masood’s case was being heard by a three-member bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar.

Turning down Shahid’s reply, CJP Nisar remarked during the hearing that the time for apologizing is now over. Justice Ijazul Ahsan stated that Shahid Masood should have been careful about his responsibility.

Giving false information in the court is contempt, the CJP observed adding that the anchor will now face the consequences for misleading it.

The bench also directed the attorney general to submit his response on the matter.

Moreover, the court appointed notable lawyer Faisal Siddiqui as amicus curiae (friend of the court) to assist it in the case.

Adjourning the hearing for a week, the court asked Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority to apprise the court as to what was channels’ responsibility in this regard and for how long can the channel and/or programme can be put off-air.

Earlier this month, a joint investigation team appointed by the SC to investigate the anchor’s claims had declared that allegations made by the TV person in Zainab rape and murder case were baseless and a mere act of propagating sensationalism.

On March 7, Shahid Masood was directed to submit his detailed response before the court.

In his reply on Saturday he told the court that he does not contest the findings of the inquiry committee and will observe due diligence and remain cautious in his conduct in future.

"I further submit that whatever the inquiry committee has concluded, I do not contest and refute the same," wrote the anchor, who had earlier offered to be hanged if his allegations were proven incorrect.

He said although the committee had included him and others in the investigation, he "could not comment on the veracity of its (the committee) findings" because the court had itself selected members of the probe team.
https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/2...c-rejects-shahid-masoods-reply-in-zainab-case
 
. . . . . . .
Shut the Chanel for one year and dangar Doctor for three years.


Will Someone Hold Ahmed Noorani For Planting False News Regarding Panama Papers Case Trying To Influence A Trial????

Or How Long Should Geo Be Banned For A Vicious Slander Campaign Against The National Security Institutions of The Country????
 
Last edited:
.
Yes Here I Am What Do You Want???
Sharam.

Will Someone Hold Ahmed Noorani For Plating False News Regarding Panama Papers Case Trying To Influence A Trial????

Or How Long Should Geo Be Banned For A Vicious Slander Campaign Against The National Security Institutions of The Country????
Doing politics over politics and politicians is one thing . Trying to get lime light over deaths and rape of a child is low beyond any measure.
 
. .

An Indian Should Be The Last Person To Talk About Sharam.Sorry This Is Our Internal Matter Not Answerable To You


Doing politics over politics and politicians is one thing . Trying to get lime light over deaths and rape of a child is low beyond any measure.


Oh So Pointing Out The Presence Of A Child **** Ring And Potentially Save Future Children From Such A Fate Is "Low"

Now I Know Why There Is So Much **** In India.
 
.
An Indian Should Be The Last Person To Talk About Sharam.Sorry This Is Our Internal Matter Not Answerable To You





Oh So Pointing Out The Presence Of A Child **** Ring And Potentially Save Future Children From Such A Fate Is "Low"

Now I Know Why There Is So Much **** In India.
Don't explode in anger .If you have anything against presence of indian in PDF take it with @WebMaster

Rest are worthless rantings.
 
.
Not all but most of the Dr. Shahid's analysis were of some weight.
Unfortunately he over reacted in Zainab's case and now have to face the consequences. I am in favour of his trial in court.
Even if IK presented the fake NOC in reference to Banigala residence, he should also be tried.
One thing which is most noticeable by PML N sympathisers is, they wish everyone to be tried even if he only lied but want their godfather to go unpunished though he lied/he is corrupt/he and his whole family involved in looting the nation's money ... very strange behavioural issue.
 
.
Don't explode in anger .If you have anything against presence of indian in PDF take it with @WebMaster

Rest are worthless rantings.


No I Don't Have Any Issue With Indians Coming On PDF I Have Issues With Indians Poking Their Nose Into An Issue Which Is Essentially Non Of Their Business And If You Had Actually Known What SM Had Actually Said You Would Not Call My Words "Rants"
 
.
No I Don't Have Any Issue With Indians Coming On PDF I Have Issues With Indians Poking Their Nose Into An Issue Which Is Essentially Non Of Their Business And If You Had Actually Known What SM Had Actually Said You Would Not Call My Words "Rants"
Don't hide your issues .It's an open forum and any one can participate in any debate irrespective of nationality . And you have an issue with it .So either check with management or get used to it.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom