Serpentine
INT'L MOD
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2011
- Messages
- 12,131
- Reaction score
- 30
- Country
- Location
No you didn't. You justified a pure terror attack as some 'random' sacking.
It wasn't just some old times battle over land or resources, it was a purely sectarian based attack by forefathers of ISIS for sole purpose of killing Shias and destroying an important religious site as they regarded as apostates and infidels. So it's a terrorist attack. It wasn't even a war between two armies, it was some savages attacking a city and killing its people for their religion, if that isn't pure ISIS style terror attack, nothing else is.
It doesn't matter if you want to whitewash it, it is what it is.
Sack of Tbilisi on the other hand had nothing to do with religion, it was just a war over alliance of Georgia with Russia against Persia at the time. You are proved wrong, again.