I knw who were responsible for those incidents and how to channelize my anger towards them...par eho jehi ghatiya gallan jede kuch Sikh veer karde ne equating that idiot with our Guru jinna ne eh panth banayi siga ona te bada taras aanda ae. My family belongs to Delhi n still live there for last 40 years par jo chaurasich hoya os chiz nu counter karan layi main ek separatist leader(read terrorist) nu apne Guru da darja dava ? na veerji...meri Sikhi mainu ae ijazat vi nai dendi. Jede log Swarn Mandir andar bandookan fadke te Gurdwara complex nu apna adda bana ke baithe si main una nu gaalan de alawa kuch nai de sakda. Ki samjhda si Bhindrawale apne aap nu je o Akaal Takhtch rehn laga. Rehn de yaara...jinna zada gal karan ode bare ona gussa aunda ae.
Wht Indira did was wrong...her intention could have been right but her way was wrong. Jadon kuch Kashmiri terrorist Masjid andar jaake chupde taan saare kehnde ne maar dalo unna nu...jadon same gal Gurdwarech howe tan aapan muh mod layiye just bcz apne dharam te gal aa jandi ae ? What happened in 84 riots was unexplainable and failure of our judiciary to convict those responsible is appalling as well but do we get any moral advantage of that when some of our own stand against punishments to guys like Rajoana as well ? Too many questions to answer among ourselves before we start questioning others.
Some points need to be addressed here since you brought in many off topic points.
1. No one compared anyone to Guru Gobind Singh Jee. Listen to the song, the singer is saying all the people mentioned by him(10th Guru Jee, Banda Singh, Bhagat Singh, Udham Singh, Sant Bhindranwale, Rajoana) as Baaghi or rebellious. By saying that they are all Baaghi one is not making them all equal or same Darja. Only the sensationalist mind would think that.
2. Contrary to the propaganda by the congress party and media, Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale was not a separatist. He never asked or demanded Khalistan. So your claim that he is separatist is false. He advocated Sikh rights and the end to the discrimination that Punjab was facing from the central government, see Punjab's water and land disputes.
3. Secondly, it is not Swarn Mandir. A Sikh should never use that term for the Sri Darbar Sahib. It is Sri Harimandir Sahib (temple of Vaheguru) or simply Darbar Sahib.
4. A Gurdwara is not a Franciscan monastery or some Buddhist temple. There is no doctrine in the Sikh faith which prevents a Sikh to carry a Shastar(weapon) to a Gurdwara. A Sikh is suppose to be Shastardhaari. Sikhs have been doing this for the last 300 years. Sikhs even do Shastar pooja. Sri Guru Gobind Singh Jee wrote a Bani in praise of Shastars called Shastar Naam Mala. Shastars are used as decoration in front of Sri Guru Granth Sahib Jee. So it doesn't make sense for a Sikh(like you) to object if a fellow Sikh carries Shastars to a Gurdwara. Also, there was a reason why Sikhs began to carry arms. It was protection from Congressi Gundas who were killing Sikhs. When Sikhs would complain to the police, many times police would not even write an FIR.
5. Your claim that Sant Jee made Sri Darbar Sahib into an Adda also needs to be addressed. At the time the entire Sikh Panth had launched the Dharm Yudh Morcha for Punjab's rights. In this were Sikhs of all walks of life from the Damdami Taksal, Nihangs, Akali Dal, Sikh students, elderly and even women. Thousands of Sikhs in Jathas of a thousand each had filled up the jails of Punjab by courting arrest. The leaders of the Morcha which included The Akalis, Sant Bhindranwale, Sikh intellectuals and even ex military officers had all made Sri Darbar Sahib as the central headquarters for this morcha because historically all Sikh morchas have been launched from Darbar Sahib. So this is nothing new. Please read up on Sikh history instead of getting brain washed by Congress propaganda.
6. I am assuming you are a Sikh? you trying to justify the attack on Sri Darbar Sahib is truly a sad thing to see. Indira Gandhi purposefully attacked on the most busy day of the year which was the martyrdom day of 5th Guru. She intentionally attacked on that day so maximum number of Sikhs would be killed. Around 5000 Sikhs were slaughtered which included women, elderly and even babies. Indira Gandhi had even surpassed the Mughal and Afghan atrocities when they attacked Darbar Sahib 2 centuries earlier.
7. You also brought up Rajoana. Try to understand the Sikh objection of his execution. For Sikhs Rajoana(who was an ex police man) was in a group which killed Beanta. This beanta is a man who won elections because Sikhs of punjab had boycotted elections that year. As a result of this, Beanta won because of the lowest electoral turnout in the history of Punjab. When he came to power he unleashed a murderous campaign in which untold numbers of Sikhs were slaughtered in cold blood. Entire families were wiped out. Rajoana at the time was a police man. When he saw first hand this slaughter of the Sikhs happening he decided to finish Beanta. Secondly, the main objection of the Sikhs to his execution is that if he is to be executed then why aren't congress leaders such as Tytler, Sajjan kumar, Kamal Nath punished who killed thousands of Sikhs in 84 anti Sikh riots? why are they rewarded with promotions? Why isn't the law the same for them?