What's new

S-300's phased array radar, world's first operational PESA in 1978

You have no proof J/APG-1 is collaboration with America. According to you, everything is collaboration with America. First man in space, first space walk, first artificial satellite in space, first manned spacecraft, first space station, first modular space station, first robotic rover on the moon, those are all Russian collaborations with America so really those are all American contributions. :victory::bounce:
you have no prove also that's J/APG-1 is only Japanese project, rest is your post is nonsense of yours @undertakerwwefan

You have no proof J/APG-1 is collaboration with America. According to you, everything is collaboration with America. First man in space, first space walk, first artificial satellite in space, first manned spacecraft, first space station, first modular space station, first robotic rover on the moon, those are all Russian collaborations with America so really those are all American contributions. :victory::bounce:
the main question is that why you relates J/APG-1 to APG-77, USA doesn't have its own research facilities for its military projects, infact both J/APG-1 and APG-77 is not relate to each other they are whole different projects and didn't relate to each other at any level @undertakerwwefan use your brain, commonsense,logic if you have @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
 
.
you have no prove also that's J/APG-1 is only Japanese project, rest is your post is nonsense of yours @undertakerwwefan

By your logic anything that does not have proof it is not an American collaboration is an American collaboration. That is faulty logic. Nobody except you says J/APG-1 is an American radar. Everyone except you says J/APG-1 is a Japanese radar. YOU claim everything is an American product because everything is an American collaboration, including the first human space flight and the first human space walk, because you love America and attributes every achievement and every product to America. No matter how much you love America, the first AESA is not an American radar, it's a Japanese radar. Deal with it.
 
.
By your logic anything that does not have proof it is not an American collaboration is an American collaboration. That is faulty logic. Nobody except you says J/APG-1 is an American radar. Everyone except you says J/APG-1 is a Japanese radar. YOU claim everything is an American product because everything is an American collaboration, including the first human space flight and the first human space walk, because you love America and attributes every achievement and every product to America. No matter how much you love America, the first AESA is not an American radar, it's a Japanese radar. Deal with it.
Ok, if its Japanese product, then its tech comes from USA, they have long experience to build fighter jet radar, and japan has none, use your brain in your, instead dog shit in your head @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
 
.
Ok, if its Japanese product, then its tech comes from USA

You claim everything's tech comes from America. Including S-300, S-400, Su-35, Su-57, including all those Japanese brand electronic products Japan exported to America in the 1980s and 1990s. You have no proof of that. Whether the tech comes from America is irrelevant. The product is not American.
 
.
You claim everything's tech comes from America. Including S-300, S-400, Su-35, Su-57, including all those Japanese brand electronic products Japan exported to America in the 1980s and 1990s. You have no proof of that. Whether the tech comes from America is irrelevant. The product is not American.
and don't relates APG-1,APG-77 to each other @undertakerwwefan
 
.
and don't relates APG-1,APG-77 to each other @undertakerwwefan

According to you, Russia and China and Japan and Sweden and France and Germany and Britain and Israel bought AESA tech from America because America is first in AESA. You have no proof of your claim.

And for the record it's not APG-1, it's Mitsubishi Electric J/APG-1, has nothing to do with American Raytheon APG radars.
 
.
According to you, Russia and China and Japan and Sweden and France and Germany and Britain and Israel bought AESA tech from America because America is first in AESA. You have no proof of your claim.

And for the record it's not APG-1, it's Mitsubishi Electric J/APG-1, has nothing to do with American Raytheon APG radars.
and who relates J/APG-1 to APG-77, you, @undertakerwwefan and i am not claiming that all AESA tech fro usa, but remember the only 2 nation developed AESA PESA tech first, USA,Russia and don't fart senselessly @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
 
.
and who relates J/APG-1 to APG-77, you

I said Mitsubishi Electric's J/APG-1 is world's first operational AESA. True. I said Raytheon's APG-77 is not world's first operational AESA. True. YOU say J/APG-1 is American tech. YOUR claim is unproven, unsubstantiated.
 
.
I said Mitsubishi Electric's J/APG-1 is world's first operational AESA. True. I said Raytheon's APG-77 is not world's first operational AESA. True. YOU say J/APG-1 is American tech. YOUR claim is unproven, unsubstantiated.
Why you farting senselessly, take your mental disability medicine please @undertakerwwefan
 
.
.
Take your farting medication please @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall: i never say that Russia bought AESA tech from USA, i only say that Russia is late for fighter jets AESA development, and that's all @undertakerwwefan :blah::blah::blah:
 
.
Take your farting medication please @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall: i never say that Russia bought AESA tech from USA, i only say that Russia is late for fighter jets AESA development, and that's all @undertakerwwefan :blah::blah::blah:

AESA is computationally intensive and uses a lot of electricity and needs a lot of cooling. Russia had PESA. Russia wasn't interested in AESA until recently and bought AESA technology from America. The only benefit of AESA over PESA is each module emits own frequencies so makes it hard to intercept by RWR.
 
.
AESA is computationally intensive and uses a lot of electricity and needs a lot of cooling. Russia had PESA. Russia wasn't interested in AESA until recently and bought AESA technology from America. The only benefit of AESA over PESA is each module emits own frequencies so makes it hard to intercept by RWR.
Keep blabbering @undertakerwwefan AESA more accurate than PESA, because AESA transmit and receive signals, whereas PESA only receive signals @undertakerwwefan
 
. .
AESA is not more accurate than PESA. They are both ESA. AESA is every module has its own frequency that changes quickly. Here's a video showing how PESA works.

Research yourself kid PESA is only receive not. 2 emit and AESA more accurate because its transmit and receive same signals to give more accurate pictures of the target than a PESA and PESA is simple tech as compare to AESA tech, @undertakerwwefan
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom