What's new

S-300's phased array radar, world's first operational PESA in 1978

I'm a Russian hardware fan. You are an American hardware fan. Both are highly education countries. Both have good hardware. You say American hardware best. I say Russian hardware best. So what? You are not American. I'm not Russian. We can agree to disagree.
I didn't say that , i am fan of American hardware, i am a neutral guy, there are lots of tech form Russia that i Phrased, and you're phrasing Russian military tech blindly without knowing the basic facts about military tech, and i am not like you but i do research before post in your thread @undertakerwwefan
 
.
I didn't say that , i am fan of American hardware, i am a neutral guy, there are lots of tech form Russia that i Phrased, and you're phrasing Russian military tech blindly without knowing the basic facts about military tech, and i am not like you but i do research before post in your thread @undertakerwwefan

You say Russia has no AESA. I showed you Russia makes AESA. You continue to deny. So where's your source Russia cannot make AESA?

Admiral Gorshkov has AESA. A-100 has AESA. MiG-35 has AESA. Su-57 and future Su-35SM has AESA. T-14 has AESA.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Admiral_Gorshkov-class_frigate

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beriev_A-100

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan_MiG-35

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-57

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-14_Armata
 
.
You say Russia has no AESA. I showed you Russia makes AESA. You continue to deny. So where's your source Russia cannot make AESA?

Admiral Gorshkov has AESA. A-100 has AESA. MiG-35 has AESA. Su-57 and future Su-35SM has AESA. T-14 has AESA.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Admiral_Gorshkov-class_frigate

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beriev_A-100

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan_MiG-35

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-57

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-14_Armata
Where i did that say, and don't put your words in my mouth, i only says that they build all of them after 2005 and they are relatively new in this field, they have little to no experience especially fighter jet or airborne AESA @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
 
.
Where i did that say, and don't put your words in my mouth, i only says that they build all of them after 2005 and they are relatively new in this field, they have little to no experience especially fighter jet or airborne AESA @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:

The US only had fighter jet AESA since December 2005 with F-22. The US only had ship AESA since October 2016 with Zumwalt. It's not like Americans have a lot of experience with AESA either.
 
.
The US only had fighter jet AESA since December 2005 with F-22. The US only had ship AESA since October 2016 with Zumwalt. It's not like Americans have a lot of experience with AESA either.
Japanese F-2 J/APG-1 with a collaboration of USA, F-16 Blk-60's APG-80 , also APG-77 AESA radar was fitted in F-22 in 1997 for testing, so they have relatively long experience with AESA manufacturing/maintenance as compare to Russia @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
 
.
Japanese F-2 J/APG-1 with a collaboration of USA, F-16 Blk-60's APG-80 , also APG-77 AESA radar was fitted in F-22 in 1997 for testing, so they have relatively long experience with AESA manufacturing/maintenance as compare to Russia @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:

How do you know Russia didn't experiment with AESA in 1980s? Russia was the first to deploy PESA first in S-300 and then in MiG-31.
 
.
How do you know Russia didn't experiment with AESA in 1980s? Russia was the first to deploy PESA first in S-300 and then in MiG-31.
Stick into one topic either you chose AESA or PESA, and PESA is relatively simple tech, thats why USA and Russia had been develop in mid 60s/70s, and PESA less accurate than AESA @undertakerwwefan
 
. .
So what? America is not first in AESA. Japan is first in AESA. J/APG-1 is first operational AESA made by NEC.
You still believing that shit, its not your problem boy, you're the mentally disable person @undertakerwwefan its collaboration b/w USA/Japan, japan had no experience to build even mechanically scanned array and suddenly they develop AESA from scratch, what pathetic logic you have @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
 
. . .
30N6E_5N63S_Flap_Lid_B_tracking_and_missile_guidance_radar_S-300PMU1_SA-10_Grumble_Russia_Russian_army_007.jpg


http://www.radartutorial.eu/19.kartei/06.missile/karte005.en.html

At the time, America's MIM-23 had mechanically scanning radar. America didn't field phased array radar until Patriot in the early 1980s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIM-23_Hawk

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-300_missile_system

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIM-104_Patriot

You should look up SCANFAR. Deployed in the 1960s.
 
.
first you prove its a only Japan product, you claiming its a only Japanese product @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:

It's a Japanese radar. You saying NEC is not a Japanese company? You saying J/APG-1 is not a Japanese radar? You might as well say Rafale and Typhoon's AESA are also collaborations with America because France and Germany are NATO, heck Japan is not even NATO. Heck, you might as well say Su-57's AESA and MiG-35's AESA are collaborations with America because after all Russia and America collaborate on International Space Station so why not on radar as well? Where's your source Rafale, Typhoon, F-2's AESA are all collaborations with American? Where's your source Gripen's AESA is collaboration with America? Where's your source Su-57's AESA is collaboration with America? Where's your source MiG-35's AESA is collaboration with America? Source please?
 
Last edited:
.
It's a Japanese radar. You saying NEC is not a Japanese company? You saying J/APG-1 is not a Japanese radar? You might as well say Rafale and Typhoon's AESA are also collaborations with America because France and Germany are NATO, heck Japan is not even NATO. Heck, you might as well say Su-57's AESA and MiG-35's AESA are collaborations with America because after all Russia and America collaborate on International Space Station so why not on radar as well? Where's your source Rafale, Typhoon, F-2's AESA are all collaborations with American? Where's your source Gripen's AESA is collaboration with America? Where's your source Su-57's AESA is collaboration with America? Where's your source MiG-35's AESA is collaboration with America? Source please?
Be real, and stop farting brainless @undertakerwwefan Japan always relaying on WEST/US for military tech since ww2 most of the military tech for Japan is come from WEST/USA, prime example are F-2 which is the collaboration of Japan/USA, and don't forget they have no experience build mechanically scanned array (fighter jets radar) and then suddenly they came up with AESA with their own, this make no sense @undertakerwwefan use your brain and commonsense, logic @undertakerwwefan
 
.
Be real, and stop farting brainless @undertakerwwefan Japan always relaying on WEST/US for military tech since ww2 most of the military tech for Japan is come from WEST/USA, prime example are F-2 which is the collaboration of Japan/USA, and don't forget they have no experience build mechanically scanned array (fighter jets radar) and then suddenly they came up with AESA with their own, this make no sense @undertakerwwefan use your brain and commonsense, logic @undertakerwwefan

You have no proof J/APG-1 is collaboration with America. According to you, everything is collaboration with America. First man in space, first space walk, first artificial satellite in space, first manned spacecraft, first space station, first modular space station, first robotic rover on the moon, those are all Russian collaborations with America so really those are all American contributions. :victory::bounce:
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom