What's new

Russian Navy

KHABAROVSK submarine
pr09851_2000.jpg


Status-6 torpedo
The Status-6 (Статус-6), aka KANYON, has been described as an unmanned midget submarine, but it is better thought of as a massively-large nuclear powered and nuclear armed torpedo. It is ginormous: 1.6m (5.5ft) in diameter and about 24m (79ft) long. To put that into perspective, it is about 27 times the volume of a regular 533mm (21”) heavyweight torpedo.
KanyonSide940.jpg
Type 65-76 torpedo



    • Diameter: 650 mm (25.6 in)
    • Length: 9.14m (30 ft)
So, roughly speaking Status 6 is 2.46 times the diameter and 2.63 times the length of the Type 65 torpedo.

Kanyon_CrossSection.jpg

A comparison of the Sarov and Khabarovsk submarines

“The leaked graphic strongly hints toward the Khabarovsk having two side-by-side hulls in the bow,” wrote Sutton.
“The basic reason behind this arrangement is that the torpedoes have to fire forward, and are carried externally to the occupied pressure hulls.”

Russian Mystery Submarine Likely Deployment Vehicle for New Nuclear Torpedo - USNI News

Some considerations on this alledged system:
  • At its alleged speed of 100 knots (about 115 miles per hour), if launched from north of Russia’s Kola Peninsula, the torpedo would take some 40 hours to reach targets on the U.S. East Coast. That’s a long time; do Russian military planners really want a system that takes nearly two days to strike its objectives?
  • At a speed of 100 knots, the Status-6 would be much faster than conventional torpedoes [note: though not from a different form, unlike e.g. Shkval]. When it comes to underwater travel, more speed usually means more noise, increasing the risk of detection. This would not appear to be a particularly stealthy system.
  • Given its long travel time to target, possibly noisily announcing its course along the way, the Status-6 would not appear to make a good first-strike weapon.
  • The Russians as a rule exercise caution about how they manage and control nuclear arms. Would Russian navy commanders be comfortable with an unmanned nuclear weapon roaming the ocean on its own for up to two days traveling to its target—or perhaps even longer if it traveled to near the target and simply lurked?
  • This was no accidental leak. Televised events involving the Russian president are carefully scripted by the Kremlin.The picture was aired because the Kremlin wanted it aired and wanted the world to believe that Russia has plans for a large nuclear torpedo. That fits with Moscow’s pattern of nuclear saber-rattling over the past two years.
  • The Status-6, operating underwater, presumably would not be troubled by an American missile interceptor. But does the Russian military really believe it needs such a system to overcome U.S. missile defenses? It would hardly seem so. By 2018, the United States will have 44 missile interceptors with a velocity capable of engaging a strategic ballistic missile warhead. At that time, Russia will have some 1,500 deployed warheads on its intercontinental ballistic missiles and submarine-launched ballistic missiles. The Russian military understands this. The Russian public may not. The Status-6 revelation thus may have been aimed at domestic viewers, to [re]assure them.
Russia’s perhaps-not-real super torpedo | Brookings Institution
 
Last edited:
. . . .
Smetlivy warship departs Sevastopol for Syrian coast
Smetlivy is a Kashin class destroyer, a group of guided missile destroyers built for the Soviet Navy in the 1960s and early 1970s (Project 61). As of 2007, just this one ship of the class is still in service with the Russian Navy.

Smetlivyy2003.jpg


Smetlivy first commissioned 25 September 1969. She was was modernised at Mykolaiv (Ukraine) in the early 1990s and fitted with new Kh-35 (SS-N-25 Switchblade, aka Harpoonski) anti-ship missiles and MNK-300 sonar. She is currently active in the Russian Navy in the Black Sea fleet.

Five simular but modified ships (project 61ME) are in service with the Indian Navy as Rajput-class destroyers. Some of these have received Barak-1 SAMs and/or Brahmos and/or new radars.

Poland commissioned the ex-Soviet Smely on 9 January 1988 as ORP Warszawa, initially a lease but the Poles bought her 1992/3, it has been decommissioned 5 December 2003 to the reserve and scrapped in 2005.
 
. . . . . . .
An aesthetically pleasing design, for sure.

I would much like to see one of these sailing together with a project 1135.6 (either Russian or Indian) and a P17. Just to see how they compare.

20-3319081-shivalik-talwar-class-frigates.jpg
 
. . . .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom